Go to The Globe and Mail

 

Blogs

Jeff Rubin's Smaller World
A blog about how weaning our economy off oil means some fundamental changes in the way we live, and other things...
Entry archive:

Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:40 AM

What do we do for the next recession?

Correctly diagnosing the nature of a disease is usually an essential first step to finding its cure. Similarly, knowing what caused this recession seems pretty pivotal to figuring out how to avoid falling into the next one.

Subprime mortgages may have blown up Wall Street, but it was triple-digit oil prices that blew up the world economy. This distinction is not just academic — it has huge implications for what steps governments should have taken and, maybe even more importantly, what steps they shouldn’t have taken.

While governments can bail out insolvent investment banks, foreclosed subprime mortgage holders and bankrupt auto producers, there can be no energy bailout.

Neither the Federal Reserve Board nor the Treasury Department can create a single BTU of energy, nor can any other central bank or finance department around the world, no matter how much money they print or how big a budgetary deficit they rack up.

Having already blown the taxpayers’ wad bailing out everybody under the sun, what’s left in the government cookie jar to fight the next oil-induced recession? The U.S. budget deficit is already nearing $1.5 trillion (U.S.). Proportional to the size of the economy, it’s the highest it’s been since World War II.

So what happens the next time our economies encounter triple-digit oil prices? With oil already trading at nearly $80 per barrel, I guess we’ll find out soon enough.

Not only do massive deficits leave no more budgetary room for further fiscal stimulus but, even worse, we will have to start paying back today’s bailouts just as tomorrow’s oil crisis slams the brakes on the economy again.

That means the next time motorists see four-dollar-per-gallon pump prices, they are likely to be hit at the same time with huge deficit-cutting tax increases and equally huge cuts in government spending.

Getting the last recession wrong not only means we are ill-equipped to deal with the next one, but also that it will be all the more severe when we have to start paying the bill for the policy moves we now have to reverse.

Fiscal pump priming and printing money aren’t the answer to triple-digit oil prices. Moving from a global economy to a local one is.

Latest Comments

Jeff Rubin's Smaller World Contributors

Jeff Rubin

After nearly 20 years as the chief economist of CIBC World Markets, Jeff Rubin left the bank earlier this year to seek a larger audience for the story he wanted to tell.


His predictions of steadily rising oil prices over the last decade, including $100 (U.S.) per barrel oil by 2007, had flown in the face of conventional economic wisdom. As he said, soaring oil prices demonstrated that the traditional laws of supply and demand were no longer working for one of the global economy's most basic and essential commodities.


The consequences would be severe. He argued that it wasn't sub-prime mortgages, but record oil prices that drove the world economy into its deepest post-war recession. And unless the economy starts to wean itself off an ever depleting supply of affordable oil, he believes there will be other recessions to follow as economic recoveries quickly push oil prices right back into triple digit range. But weaning our economy off oil means some fundamental changes in the way we live.


That's not the kind of message chief economists' at investment banks are supposed to deliver so he resigned from CIBC World Markets to write about it in his new book Why Your World Is About To Get A Whole Lot Smaller. See his website at jeffrubinssmallerworld.com.