Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Community

Inside The Globe

Public Editor Sylvia Stead responds to readers and gives a behind-the-scenes look

Entry archive:

Game of Thrones (HBO)
Game of Thrones (HBO)

Public editor: When the spoiler alert becomes pointless Add to ...

There was a brief flurry on Twitter Monday morning and also an e-mail to me about a spoiler (spoiling?) headline and photograph with a Game of Thrones story.

The story starts out with this warning in bold letters: (Warning: Spoilers. If you have not watched Episode 2 of Season 4, don’t read this).

But the problem was that too much was given away with the headline and accompanying photo. I don’t want to make it worse by giving anything away here, but you can click on the link if you want to know more.

More Related to this Story

One reader on Twitter said: “SERIOUSLY. A Tweet with the words “spoiler alert” + an auto loading photo = 2014 oxymoron.”

Another said, “@globeandmail Spoiler alert: This is a spoiler.”

One other said, “DON’T tweet characters picture. No time to avert eyes.”

The Globe and Mail’s community editors posted a tweet apologizing: “You have been heard. And we’ve shackled the tweet writer.”

And the photo on the story that gave away too much has been changed now.

Peter Kavanagh sent me an e-mail asking: “What do you gain by revealing the death of a major character in the Game of Thrones. ... All who have seen the episode know what happened, all who haven’t are denied a certain dramatic pleasure. ... Should I just assume that your columnists will now reveal the end of mystery novels, the solutions to the crossword, the final answer on Jeopardy because you can …”

In a follow up e-mail, he said: “ While I don’t object to spoilers in stories … I can avoid the stories if I don’t want the dramatic tension erased. … But it is very hard to ignore a headline.”

He is absolutely correct about this. It’s fair to write about a live sports event and TV shows, but it’s not fair to viewers to give away anything in the headline. You can choose to avoid a story, but not a headline.

But there were some readers who didn’t see a problem with the Tweet (or the article): “@globeandmail it’s been in the books for fifteen years, don’t apologize.”

I don’t think you can count on all viewers having read the books before the series, but still it’s nice to hear from the other side too.

Follow on Twitter: @SylviaStead

 

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories