Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

AdChoices
A Wall Street sign is seen above two 'One Way' signs in New York in this August 24, 2015, file photo. (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)
A Wall Street sign is seen above two 'One Way' signs in New York in this August 24, 2015, file photo. (Lucas Jackson/Reuters)

Hedge fund investors dump humans for computers and still lose Add to ...

Losses at Leda Braga’s computer-driven hedge fund this year are running at about twice the level suffered by a macro fund run by billionaire Alan Howard. Yet, while Ms. Braga has raised money, investors have pulled billions of dollars from Mr. Howard’s fund.

The divergence is a sign of the sweeping changes underway in the $3-trillion global hedge fund industry, where investors are shunning flesh and blood traders and putting their faith, and hard cash, in algorithms to bet on macro economic trends.

Star traders are losing clients after years of poor returns in a near-zero-rate environment, with managers finding it tough to read economic indicators, predict markets and get an edge in an era of widespread access to information. Investors are turning to model-driven funds in the hope that machines, detached from all emotional bias, are better placed to make money or protect their capital should markets turn volatile.

“There is a general skepticism about the ability of discretionary macro managers to make money with rates at zero,” said Michele Gesualdi, who oversees $3-billion as the chief investment officer at Kairos Investment Management, which invests in hedge funds. “Investors understand trend following and think this is more predictable.”

Funds that use mathematical models have raised $21-billion this year, according to data provider eVestment, while the rest of the industry suffered $60 billion of withdrawals.

Investors could be ditching their human money managers just when they’re needed most, Mr. Gesualdi said, with the U.S. Federal Reserve expected to increase interest rates and spur volatility in global markets. “This is usually the best environment for macro managers,” he said.

Ms. Braga, 50, who has a doctorate in engineering from Imperial College London, lost 7.1 per cent in the first nine months of the year at her main $7.4-billion BlueTrend Programme, while her firm’s total assets under management held steady at $9.5-billion. That signals the losses were replaced by fresh capital.

Alan Howard’s $13.7-billion Master Fund was down 3.4 per cent this year at the end of September, according to investor letters, and the firm saw assets decline by $6.4-billion to $17.3-billion during the period. The 53-year-old money manager, who started his firm in 2002, specializes in fixed income and foreign exchange trading.

Spokesmen for Ms. Braga and Mr. Howard declined to comment.

One reason investors are buying into computer-driven funds is their good performance in bad times, said Philippe Ferreira, head of research at Lyxor Asset Management which invests in hedge funds. “The flows this year show you that this is precisely what investors are looking for at present,” he said.

So far, the shift hasn’t been profitable. Three of at least four computer-driven hedge funds managed by Man Group Plc’s AHL division lost money through September this year. The unit added $2.1-billion to its assets during the period, according to a company filing.

Winton Capital Management, one of the world’s largest quantitative hedge fund firms that’s overseen by David Harding, managed $34.4 billion at the end of September, up from $33.7 billion at the end of last year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Winton’s main Futures Fund lost 1 per cent during the period, while the Winton Evolution Fund declined 3 per cent. A spokesman declined to comment.

“Investors are favoring liquid and transparent strategies at the expense of traditional macro hedge funds which bear a certain amount of key-man risk,” said Nicolas Roth, co-head of alternative assets at REYL & Cie SA, a Geneva-based investment firm. Computer-driven funds aren’t making money this year because some models were disrupted, he said.

“Most systems are not designed to benefit from the v-shape reversals that we have witnessed this year while the sell-off early 2016 has skewed a number of models,” Roth said.

Billionaire Paul Tudor Jones, whose macro hedge fund has lost money this year, cut 15 percent of its staff and lowered some fees earlier to stem an exodus of investors, who’ve pulled $2.1 billion this year. His remaining managers have been paired with scientists and mathematicians to bring new analytical rigor to their trading as part of a quantitative revamp of the firm. Andrew Law’s Caxton Associates also trimmed management fees amid losses earlier this year.

Anthony Lawler, co-head systematic investments at GAM Holding AG that manages 119.1 billion francs ($122.6-billion), said discretionary macro hedge fund managers have run with low risk levels for about six years now and have therefore found it difficult to perform even when their trades are right.

“Investors feel that fundamental macro investors could be struggling because no one can trade the Fed surprise risk well,” London-based Lawler said. Investors maybe better off buying computer-driven funds “where there is more of a focus on price risk, not only fundamental expectations,” he said.

Report Typo/Error

Next story

loading

In the know

The Globe Recommends

loading

Most popular videos »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular