Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

To defend your portfolio, all you really need is a sincere desire to learn from your experiences (both good and challenging), and a willingness to confront the hidden assumptions and biases that lie behind your own financial behaviour. (Jupiterimages/Photos.com)
To defend your portfolio, all you really need is a sincere desire to learn from your experiences (both good and challenging), and a willingness to confront the hidden assumptions and biases that lie behind your own financial behaviour. (Jupiterimages/Photos.com)

Expert’s Podium

Can you defend your investing strategy? Add to ...

One of the most intriguing aspects of belonging to TIGER 21 (a peer-to-peer learning and networking group for high net worth investors/entrepreneurs) is participating in the “Portfolio Defence.” Once a month, one member opens up their portfolio, showing their holdings to their 10-plus fellow group members, sharing their broad-level approach to money and wealth, answering questions and receiving fellow member feedback.

More Related to this Story

Over the past few years, I’ve attended over 100 TIGER 21 portfolio defences and I’ve come to see them as one of the most valuable learning experiences a wealthy investor could ever go through. So much so, that I believe every investor should experience one, no matter what their net worth.

Of course, you don’t have to be a TIGER 21 member to to ask yourself some of the hard questions that TIGERs ask while reviewing a portfolio. In fact, you don’t even need a group of friends or fellow investors to go through the defence with you. All you really need is a sincere desire to learn from your experiences (both good and challenging), and a willingness to confront the hidden assumptions and biases that lie behind your own financial behaviour.

The intention is to put the person on the “warm-but-not-hot seat”: to respectfully grill them about their investment holdings, to press them about their investment rationale, to shake them out of their complacency, and to challenge the hidden assumptions in their portfolio. I’ve heard members confess that the process is a little challenging at times. It’s not easy putting yourself out there, and being respectfully viewed by your peers. But make no mistake – there is tremendous benefit from it.

The typical TIGER 21 portfolio defence is pretty extensive, running about an hour and a half. Whatever is discussed within the room stays in the room (every member is under a strict (and legally binding) confidentiality agreement) in order to create a safe place where people who are used to rarely talking about money can actually talk about their wealth with peers.

The defence usually covers the following topics:

  • The qualitative story – the individual’s background, passions, motivation, lessons learned, etc. (15 minutes)
  • The quantitative story – the individual’s net worth statement; asset allocation mix; investment and manager performance; wealth timeline, etc. (15 minutes)
  • Clarifying questions and requests for additional information from the group. (20 minutes)
  • “Care-frontational” feedback and suggestions from the Group about possible improvements and potential blindspots. (20 minutes)
  • Next steps – what decisions and actions the individual needs to take in order to be accountable to themselves as a result of this discussion. (20 minutes)

Before the Defence, each TIGER 21 member must complete a 12-page questionnaire (with help, of course), which helps clarify some of their ideas and provides focus for the discussion to come. Many of those questions concern the nuts and bolts of wealth management. Others cover the individual’s idea of wealth: what role does wealth play in the individual’s life, what purpose does it serve, and so on.

Here are some of the questions included in the qualitative part of the questionnaire:

  • What do you see as the larger purpose and value of your wealth? Have you discussed this with your spouse? Your children? In what ways do you have similar or divergent perspectives on this question?
  • Write your “Top 10” list of lessons learned about yourself, about investing and wealth, and about others during your journey so far?
  • What lessons would you like to pass on?
  • Describe or create your “100 year plan” for your family.
  • What role would you like money and wealth play in your relationships with your children, grandchildren, and/or parents?
  • To whom do you feel a sense of obligation when it comes to the use and distribution of your wealth? How do you wish to fulfill this obligation?
  • What would you like to see as your epitaph?

As you can see, the purpose of the review is as much about goals and vision as it is about what stocks you own. In my experience, this is the area where a lot of UHNW individuals lack clarity. Or they may have it clear in their minds, but it’s difficult to articulate. The idea of asking these questions of yourself is to get you to think differently – about your attitude towards wealth, your goals, and your investments – and to benefit from the collective intelligence of those sitting around the table with you.

At the core of the Defence are the questions and feedback from fellow group members. Members are encouraged to be direct, respectful, and brutally candid. And I should add, they use their “you-know-what” detector where appropriate.

The word “care-frontational” is often used to describe it – I think it sums up the overall vibe quite well. The members care deeply about each others’ well being, and truly look forward to the opportunity to help. But they aren’t going to sugar-coat their suggestions or their criticisms. There would be less value if the feedback was fluff.

Even if you have no desire to confidentially share your portfolio or your in-depth financial situation to others, ask yourself these questions. Your answers will tell you a lot about the way you envision wealth, and what you need to work on. And if you can’t answer them – well, that tells you something very important too.

“Convince me you really understand how this investment works.”A common question put to TIGER 21 Members, particularly new ones. Too often people invest in exotic assets (or individual stocks) without really understanding how they work. This can lead to all sorts of trouble, as proven in the 2008 market downturn.

I’m not saying you need to have a PhD in finance or a CFA designation to invest in a given opportunity. But if you can’t articulate in broad strokes how a particular investment works, then you should take a long, hard look at whether you should be in it.

I thought it would be interesting to share with you a selection of questions I’ve heard at real-life defences, along with some of the actual advice that was given by TIGER 21 members:

“Other than making money, what’s your goal here?”

Sure, we all want to turn a profit. But the difference between a speculator and an investor is goals. Ideally, your assets will be tied to a particular financial or life goal: “this investment helps me sleep at night”; “this one will generate income in retirement”; “these stocks will help me send my kids to Harvard”; and so on. If you can’t articulate why you’re investing in X, then you need to re-examine your overall investment plan.

Another question that comes up a lot is “Can you afford to go ‘all in’ on XYZ?” Particularly with former business owners, or with those who have just joined TIGER 21. Many UHNW individuals are quite comfortable with taking risks. As a result, they load up or concentrate on a particular stock, or a particular sector, or a particular business asset. That’s fine when the goal is wealth accumulation. But when the focus shifts to wealth preservation, “all in” should be reserved for poker games, not portfolios.

“How will you know you’ve ‘won?’ ”

I remember smiling when I heard this question – it’s a very good way to put a common problem that many investors have: they don’t have an exit strategy. Where are the goalposts? When have you made enough? At what point do you sell or cash in? There’s no right answer to these questions – it all depends on your personal goals. The real red flag, however, is not having an answer at all. Not knowing when (or how) you’re going to get out of an investment or business is often the first sign of emotional investing or lack of strategic thinking.

“You’ve done a really good job on your portfolio. Now: let’s imagine you get run over by a bus tomorrow. What happens next?”

This question was asked by a longstanding TIGER member based in New York with a reputation for candour. When he asked this, it was like throwing a grenade onto the table – it really provoked a passionate and spirited debate. His point was a very important one: having a portfolio is all well and good, but if you haven’t spent time on your estate plan, all your effort could be for nothing.

“Have you asked your spouse, kids, and business partner how they feel about your will?”

A question that was asked in one of the Los Angeles groups I attended. It sparked a lengthy discussion at the time. Some people believe an estate plan is a very private matter – they write it without really consulting or communicating with heirs. I can see the rationale for such an approach: it’s their money, and they should be able to decide what to do with it. But from what I’ve seen, the downside of such an approach far outweighs the privacy concerns.

In my experience, it’s never a good idea to give spouses, children, and/or business partners a shock or surprise in your will. Doing so simply encourages conflict and legal hassles. If you haven’t let your heirs know about your plans (or if you have no clue how the might react to some of your bequests), you might want to address the topic before they find out from your will.

“All this money you’re giving away ... how will you know it’s making a difference?”

A topic that keeps coming up in TIGER meetings. Cutting a cheque to a charity is all well and good, but if you’re looking to really make a difference, you need to follow up your charity with accountability.

Choose organizations that have built-in systems of transparency, accountability and financial reporting – organizations that are used to communicating with donors and telling them what’s going on. Alternatively, set up your own foundation or gift fund that accomplishes this. The point is not to focus on the dollars you’re giving, but rather what those dollars are actually accomplishing for your chosen cause.

If some of the top one-tenth of the 1 per cent are tapping into a confidential peer-to-peer learning group to be “care-frontationally” challenged to see if they have potential“blind spots, maybe it’s time for you to do the same exercise?

Thane Stenner is founder of Stenner Investment Partners within Richardson GMP Ltd., as well as Portfolio Manager and Director, Wealth Management. Thane is also Managing Director for TIGER 21 Canada (www.tiger21.com/canada). He is the bestselling author of ´True Wealth: an expert guide for high-net-worth individuals (and their advisors)’. (www.stennerinvestmentpartners.com) (Thane.Stenner@RichardsonGMP.com). The opinions expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and readers should not assume they reflect the opinions or recommendations of Richardson GMP Ltd. or its affiliates. Richardson GMP Limited, Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund.

Single page

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories