Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

AdChoices
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Sept. 16, 2016. (Michael Nagle/Bloomberg)
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Sept. 16, 2016. (Michael Nagle/Bloomberg)

STRATEGY

Return of stock market volatility: Is there a cause for concern? Add to ...

Let me say this up front: If interest rates rise, the stock market is in trouble, especially if an economic rebound is not driving the higher interest rates.

Having said this, I do not think the increased volatility in September is the result of markets fearing higher interest rates, nor do I think that economic fundamentals are deteriorating to justify the increased volatility and sharp sell-offs. And I definitely do not believe that traders came back from their vacation and decided to push the sell button just because they are miserable that they are back to work – the popular explanation appearing in the media these days.

This is not the start of a sustained decline, but, in my opinion, a temporary blip – again assuming that the U.S. Federal Reserve will not unjustifiably push interest rates higher. The stock-market declines are not based on deteriorating economic fundamentals.

While an increase in interest rates will definitely change the fundamental picture and justify sharp stock-market declines, the September rise in volatility has to do more with seasonal factors than fundamental reasons.

In my opinion, portfolio managers – having made a handsome return over the past six months – do not want to risk their Christmas bonus, in light of a likely increase in interest rates, and are rebalancing their portfolios in a predictable way according to the gamesmanship hypothesis that I have described in detail in prior articles in The Globe and Mail and that I’ll summarize below.

In the long run, economic fundamentals drive the stock market. In the short run, and definitely within a year, the stock market is driven up or down around the long-term trend by portfolio managers’ desire to rebalance their portfolios in order to maximize the chance of getting their Christmas bonus.

September and October, in particular, tend to be the weakest months of the year. Why?

It is because portfolio managers are selling to lock in their Christmas bonus giving returns earned since February, 2016.

That is, to understand the seasonal behaviour of stock prices – and the relative weakness in September and October – you need to understand the factors driving such seasonality.

We normally talk about institutions making investment decisions. This is not true. It is individuals working for institutions who make those decisions. These people have their own psychology, over which they have little control, and their own agendas, which may differ from those of the institutions they work for.

Professional portfolio managers’ own agendas and their efforts to maximize their own benefits lead them to rebalance portfolios (and window dress) in a predictable way throughout the year.

The high returns on risky securities around the turn of the year are caused by systematic shifts in the portfolio holdings of professional portfolio managers who rebalance their portfolios to affect performance-based remuneration (that is, their Christmas bonus).

Institutional investors are net buyers of risky securities around the turn of the year when they are motivated to include lesser-known, higher-risk securities in their portfolios and are trying to outperform benchmarks.

Later on in the year, portfolio managers (as they rebalance their portfolios) divest from lesser-known, risky stocks and replace them with well-known and less risky stocks or risk-free securities, such as government bonds.

Toward the last few months of the year, they switch to stocks or securities they perceive to be less risky and more glamorous and in so doing they spruce up their portfolios (that is, window dress) and, at the same time, lock in returns.

The excess demand or supply for risky stocks throughout the year bids the prices of these securities up or down.

Moreover, as portfolio managers are exposed to the human behaviour of herding, they tend to move in tandem when they decide to buy or sell stocks; their effect on stock prices is pervasive and powerful, leading, on average, to the seasonal strength of stocks in November to April and weakness in May to October, particularly in September and October.

Portfolio managers are now selling trying to lock in their Christmas-bonus-giving returns.

If this is the case then there is nothing to worry about. In fact, sharp sell-offs in September and possibly October could provide good investment opportunities for well-financed investors. The seasonal increase in volatility and market weakness will reverse themselves when the rebalancing is over in a couple of months, again assuming that interest rates will not unjustifiably increase.

George Athanassakos is a professor of finance and holds the Ben Graham Chair in Value Investing at the Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario.

Report Typo/Error

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeInvestor

Also on The Globe and Mail

Money Talk: The potential for a U.S. Fed rate hike (BNN Video)

Next story

loading

In the know

The Globe Recommends

loading

Most popular videos »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular