Skip to main content
perspective

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. suffered its first-ever annual sales decline last year, marking the end of a decades-long era of growth. Now the retailer faces another worrisome change: exile from dividend royalty.

The aggregate amount of cash Wal-Mart paid out in the form of dividends to its shareholders fell by 1.1 per cent in the second quarter from a year ago, marking only the third such year-over-year drop in its history. (It also occurred in the first quarter of this year and the first quarter of 2014.)

This matters because the retailer has long been a member of the "dividend aristocrats," companies in the S&P 500 index that have increased dividends every year for 25 consecutive years. These 50 or so companies, including McDonald's and AT&T, are a magnet for long-term, income-minded investors drawn to steady cash flow.

And with bond yields at record lows, investors are placing an even higher premium on dividend-delivering corporate stocks. Any sign these companies might not increase their dividends could be a signal to shareholders and competitors of a cash-flow problem, according to Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Wal-Mart executives like to brag the company has increased its dividend for 43 straight years – and doesn't intend to stop. While that's true, lately it looks as if Wal-Mart has been doing the bare minimum to cling to the aristocracy.

After years of steep increases, Wal-Mart boosted its quarterly dividend payout by just one additional penny in each of the past three years. That came out to a four-cent increase last year, bringing its annual dividend to $2 (U.S.) a share. In aggregate, Wal-Mart's total payout has shrunk, as it has fewer shares on which to pay dividends – it has spent billions of dollars buying back stock in recent years, reducing its share count by 18 per cent since 2010.

Of course, when it comes to investing, everything is relative. Wal-Mart's dividend yield of 2.7 per cent still beats the S&P 500's 2.1 per cent yield. That metric, though, is calculated by dividing the annual dividend per share by the price, and Wal-Mart's shares fell by 30 per cent in 2015. Its shares have fared much better lately, gaining 18 per cent so far this year.

And when investors seeking safety consider the record-low yields of U.S. Treasury debt – the 10-year note yield is hovering around 1.5 per cent – anything more than that from a U.S. corporate stalwart such as Wal-Mart looks pretty good.

Other big companies are catching on that they don't have to break the bank to attract investors: The average dividend increase among S&P 500 companies that raised dividends so far this year is 10 per cent, down from 17.5 per cent in 2014 and 26 per cent in 2011, when companies that may have suspended dividends during the recession revved them up again, according to S&P's Mr. Silverblatt.

As long as Wal-Mart keeps raising its dividends, it doesn't really need to dole out more to stay competitive.

Either way, Wal-Mart slowing its dividend growth isn't necessarily a bad thing. It leaves more of the company's $10-billion in free cash flow for building its business for the long term, with investments such as its recently announced $3.3-billion acquisition of e-commerce upstart Jet.com. That could improve Wal-Mart's chances of keeping up with changing consumer trends. After all, aristocracy tends to get in trouble when it ignores the masses.

Shelly Banjo is a columnist with Bloomberg News.

Interact with The Globe