Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

(BRENDAN MCDERMID/Reuters)
(BRENDAN MCDERMID/Reuters)

Breakingviews

Needed: pay cuts at Goldman Add to ...

Goldman Sachs talks a good game about balancing short-term earnings with longer-term opportunities. In the current moribund environment, the moves by chief executive Lloyd Blankfein and his lieutenants to tweak the Wall Street firm’s capital structure and trim its costs look savvy. But they’re still treating pay as sacrosanct.

More Related to this Story

Overall compensation as a percentage of Goldman’s revenue came in at 44 per cent in the second quarter, as in the first three months of the year. That’s way above the 35 per cent at JPMorgan’s investment banking unit. The comparison isn’t quite apples to apples, but such a high rate looks unsustainable when Goldman only managed a measly 5.4-per-cent annualized return on equity in the second quarter.

The ROE would have been lower had Mr. Blankfein not already started cutting $1.4-billion (U.S.) from annual non-compensation expenses. Goldman also bought back 14.3 million shares last quarter – more than analysts were expecting. But banks don’t get to decide freely on that: The Federal Reserve makes the call based on a company’s capital and liquidity.

Goldman executives recognize the problem of having returns below the cost of capital, which is probably around 10 to 11 per cent. “We are not going to have an acceptable return on equity in this environment,” finance chief David Viniar lamented. He also announced an extra $500-million of annual non-comp expense cuts by the end of the year.

Such initiatives make it all the odder that pay – the bank’s biggest expense – has remained untouched. Granted, Goldman usually adjusts accumulated pay in the fourth quarter, for example taking last year’s total comp down slightly to 42.4 per cent of revenue.

Assuming 2012 earnings come in at double the first-half showing, Goldman’s ROE would only top 10 per cent if the comp ratio fell to 38 per cent of revenue. Executives are concerned that too drastic a cut could push staff to leave for rivals. But shareholders get only what’s left over after bankers get their bonuses. They’ll expect a bigger slice than they’re currently getting. Only when Goldman can restore its traditional premium profitability will its owners accept the need for premium pay.

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeInvestor

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories