Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

RCMP Constable Bill Bentley leaves court after the second day of his perjury trial in Vancouver on June 11, 2013. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)
RCMP Constable Bill Bentley leaves court after the second day of his perjury trial in Vancouver on June 11, 2013. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press)

Mounties ‘colluded’ to lie in Dziekanski case, Crown charges Add to ...

The four Mounties involved in Robert Dziekanski’s death “colluded” to come up with a story designed to justify their actions and then attempted to cover up their collusion by lying to a public inquiry, a Crown lawyer alleged on Thursday ahead of the perjury trial of one of the officers.

Constable Bill Bentley is the first of the four officers to stand trial for perjury for their testimony at the public inquiry into the death of Mr. Dziekanski, who was stunned with a Taser at Vancouver’s airport in October, 2007.

More Related to this Story

The Crown has asked the judge hearing the case to allow the statements each of the officers made to homicide investigators in the hours after Mr. Dziekanski’s death to be presented at Constable Bentley’s trial.

Crown counsel Eric Gottardi said the statements and police notes of all four officers contain the same inaccuracies and often use the same language to describe what happened when they confronted Mr. Dziekanski – leading to the “irresistible conclusion” they worked together to create the story they told investigators.

For example, all four officers claimed Mr. Dziekanski had to be wrestled to the ground, and at least two said he appeared to be “fighting through” the Taser stun. A video that came out later clearly showed Mr. Dziekanski fell to the floor almost immediately after the Taser was deployed, he noted.

“It’s the Crown’s theory that these incorrect observations were not the product of any confusion or a genuine mistake, but rather resulted from collaboration between the accused and his fellow officers before providing their accounts [to homicide investigators],” Mr. Gottardi told B.C. Supreme Court.

“The evidence of the statement shows collusion, and the motivation of the perjury is to cover up the fact that they had colluded together. They had concocted this version of events before the video emerged.”

Mr. Gottardi noted the Crown intends to present the same theory at the trials of Constable Kwesi Millington, Constable Gerry Rundell, and former corporal Benjamin (Monty) Robinson.

None of the allegations against the officers have been proven in court.

Constable Bentley’s lawyer was not expected to respond directly to the Crown’s allegations until at least Friday.

Mr. Bentley has pleaded not guilty to the perjury charge.

The four officers responded to 911 calls about a man throwing furniture at Vancouver’s airport in the early morning of Oct. 14, 2007. Within seconds of their arrival, Constable Millington stunned Mr. Dziekanski with a Taser multiple times, and the Polish immigrant died on the airport floor shortly after.

Mr. Dziekanski’s death prompted a public inquiry, and all four officers were called to testify under oath.

The Crown alleges Constable Bentley lied six times during his testimony at the public inquiry in February, 2011, primarily when he attempted to explain discrepancies between an amateur video of the confrontation and what he said in his notes and police statement.

He is also accused of lying when he said he did not recall whether the officers talked about what happened between Mr. Dziekanski’s death and when they were interviewed by homicide investigators.

Judge Mark McEwan, who is hearing the case, raised concerns about accusing the other three officers of collusion when the Crown does not intend to call them as witnesses to respond to the allegations.

“In order to do that, I have to draw certain conclusions about other people ... without hearing from them,” Judge McEwan said in one of many similar exchanges with Crown.

“In a sense, you’re asking me to collaterally treat all four of them as if they’re on trial.”

Judge McEwan also raised the possibility of “inconsistent rulings” if he reaches one conclusion about the collusion allegations but the judges or juries hearing the other officers’ cases decide something different.

Mr. Gottardi responded that the judge need only concern himself with how the statement affects Constable Bentley’s trial. It will be for future courts, he said, to weigh the evidence against the other officers and determine their guilt or innocence.

The four officers are standing trial separately.

Mr. Robinson’s trial is scheduled to start in November, while Constable Millington and Constable Rundell are scheduled to stand trial early next year. Those three trials are scheduled to be heard by juries.

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeBC

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories