Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Renderings of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights as designed by Antoine Predock.
Renderings of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights as designed by Antoine Predock.

Exhibition

Ukrainian group wants review of human-rights museum plan Add to ...

The Ukrainian Canadian Congress has started a postcard campaign to try to persuade Heritage Minister James Moore to set up a new advisory committee to determine the content of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights in Winnipeg.

The postcard is the latest gambit in a UCC effort to secure substantial and permanent exhibition space in the museum for both the Holodomor - the genocidal famine that occurred in Soviet-occupied Ukraine in 1932-33 - and the internment of 6,000 Ukrainian immigrants in Canada during the First World War as part of the first imposition of the War Measures Act.

More related to this story

The UCC is upset that a report published in September by a 17-member museum-content advisory committee grants permanent gallery space to only the Holocaust and Canada's aboriginal peoples. The congress wants the museum, scheduled to open in 2013 as the first federally funded national museum outside the Ottawa region, to honour the terms of an April, 2003, letter to the UCC from Moe Levy, executive director of the Asper Foundation, progenitor of the museum.

In the letter, Mr. Levy agrees, in exchange for UCC support of the human-rights concept, that the Ukrainian genocide "will be featured clearly, distinctly and permanently" in the museum, while adding that "the intent of the museum is not to single out any one group but to portray the human costs when human rights are abused." Mr. Levy also agrees that the internment of Ukrainian Canadians "should be included."

The postcard prepared by the UCC - its front features a photograph of Ukrainians behind a barbed-wire fence, along with the exhortation "This time we want in!" - keys entirely on the internment issue. Supporters are asked to sign the back of the postcard, which calls for a content committee that is "truly representative of the Canadian population, inclusive, fair-minded and non-partisan," and mail it to the Heritage Minister in Ottawa.

On Dec. 18, representatives of the UCC, the Ukrainian Civil Liberties Association and the Canadian Enthnocultural Council met in Toronto with five members of the museum, including museum president and CEO Stuart Murray. At the meeting, the museum reiterated its position that the advisory committee report, while important, is not definitive. And while the museum's content will be contained in 12 "zones," including two dedicated to the Holocaust and aboriginal issues, the content of these exhibits is not yet fixed.

Indeed, according to the museum's director of communications, Angela Cassie, it is anticipated that the Holocaust zone will deal not just with Jewish persecution but also with the sufferings of "the Roma, persons with physical and mental disabilities, gay men, lesbians … among other communities." The "memorial-type nature of previous treatments of both the Holocaust and some other genocides," she said, "is not the approach being taken [by the CMHR] … Looking through the human-rights lens is meant to convey a very strong emotion that we need to remain vigilant …[that]we need to understand how they occur."

A follow-up meeting involving Ukrainian Canadians and the museum is expected to be held in Winnipeg in mid- to late January. However, Bernie Farber, CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress, thinks Mr. Moore and the museum should ignore any calls for a new advisory committee. "What a waste of time and money that would be," he said this week. The original advisory committee took "an extensive cross-country consultation process. … Just because one or two communities didn't get exactly what they demanded doesn't mean you start from the beginning and re-create it. This was a very well done committee … "

Lubomyr Luciuk of the Ukrainian Civil Liberties Association said if it's true that the museum "can't tell the whole story" of every mass atrocity within its walls, perhaps the museum should consider thematic galleries. "Why not have a gallery called 'Canadian Internment Operations' that deals with Ukrainians and others during the First World War, Germans, Italians and Japanese during the Second, the Québécois in 1970? Why don't you deal with genocides, compare them? Genocides in Europe, Africa and Asia, the crimes of communism as well as fascism."

In the meantime, another organization, the German-Canadian Congress, has decided it's "alarmed and concerned" about the museum's dedication of permanent galleries to Holocaust and Canadian aboriginal issues. In a statement issued last week, Congress president Tony Bergmeier calls on the museum to be "inclusive and equitable in its treatment. … No suffering by one group can be more important than the suffering of others."

However, in a letter this week to Mr. Bergmeier expressing "profound dismay" at the German-Canadian position, the CJC's Mr. Farber argues the museum "makes no sense" without a permanent Holocaust exhibition. The Holocaust was "unprecedented in its scope and dimensions," he writes, in that it thrust the concept of genocide into the consciousness of the modern world while serving as the wellspring for the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Said Mr. Farber: "We would have expected a greater sensitivity to the issue of Holocaust remembrance and commemoration in Canada from the GCC."

 

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories