This series grew out of the question, where does the Canadian military go after Afghanistan? Would the Canadian public support a similar mission in the future? Should we return to a peace-keeping role? Beyond those issues, the series examined other aspects of the Canadian military. Some of those issues included:
How important is Arctic defence to our military strategy?
What role does the Canadian navy play and can its potential be realized without a significant equipment update?
How do governments go about winning public support for often messy and open-ended conflicts?
Canada has repeatedly said no to a mission in the Congo. Can we continue to neglect failing UN missions?
Most-viewed, most-discussed stories
Ships from the past power Canada's navy of the future Decades of neglect of the fleet threaten to undermine the navy's unique advantages for modern assignments. More...
Top scored Catalyst comment
The discussion should start with building a consensus on what Canada's strategic interests are and what role the military should play in supporting them. The debate must rise above partisan politics and any single minority ideology... MGAEdwards
Top scored Reader comment
Exactly the way it should be. Canada needs to play a constructive role in the world - seeking to reduce violence rather than contribute to it. Kjell Anderson
Expert panel debate: Most viewed video
Most viewed interactive
Most active live chat
Most active poll and results
Will having a strong military be more or less important in the future?
Of 10,991 votes cast:
48% More important
26% Less important
25% Same importance as today
Canada has a moral duty to help where help from the international community is desperately needed; places like the Democratic Republic of Congo, where mass rape is being used as a weapon of war. The reality is that if Canada is to help continue to play a military role beyond its airspace and coastal waters, then it will need battle-ready soldiers and state-of-the-art weaponry. The Globe and MailReport Typo/Error