Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Canada's Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa November 8, 2012. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)
Canada's Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa November 8, 2012. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)

Confidential files

Veterans Minister closed privacy probe Add to ...

An investigation by Canada’s veterans Ombudsman into a controversial breach of privacy was quietly shut down last year on the instructions of Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney, newly released documents reveal.

Mr. Blaney asked the Ombudsman to discontinue a probe that his predecessor had ordered in January, 2011, after the confidential medical information of veterans advocate Sean Bruyea was spread around the department in an alleged smear campaign.

More Related to this Story

Information from a psychiatrist’s letter was stitched into a ministerial briefing note at the same time Mr. Bruyea, an outspoken critic, was publicly criticizing a controversial overhaul of veterans’ benefits in 2006.

Former veterans minister Jean-Pierre Blackburn asked the Ombudsman to investigate Mr. Bruyea’s privacy breach, even though the Office of the Privacy Commissioner was already looking into what happened.

The hope was the Ombudsman would get to the bottom of why the personal information of Mr. Bruyea and others was rifled through by bureaucrats – motives that were not the focus of the overarching privacy audit by Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart.

But in July, 2011, just two months after Mr. Blackburn went down to electoral defeat, Mr. Blaney – Mr. Blackburn’s replacement at the cabinet table – wrote to veterans Ombudsman Guy Parent to ask that the probe be halted.

“I have since been able to carefully review this case with my officials,” Mr. Blaney wrote in the letter, obtained by The Canadian Press.

“We have determined that the best course of action is a review by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.

“In this way, the Commissioner can complete an assessment of the department’s actions and conclude on its compliance with the requirements of the Privacy Act.”

Lisa Monette, a spokeswoman for the Ombudsman, said Mr. Parent agreed the privacy commissioner was best positioned to review the matter, but that the Ombudsman “stood willing to assist as needed.”

A spokesman for Mr. Blaney, Niklaus Schwenker, said the minister acted swiftly to refer the matter to Ms. Stoddart, and reiterated that the Harper government has “brought forward sweeping privacy improvements within the department.”

The federal government settled a lawsuit with Mr. Bruyea out of court and has implemented a series of measures meant to tighten up the handling of personal information within the department.

Veterans Affairs is in the unusual position of holding a vast amount of personal data – including medical files – on ex-soldiers, some of whom turn into outspoken critics.

A number of advocates other than Mr. Bruyea have claimed their files were used to discredit them within the department and political circles.

One of the country’s most decorated veterans of the Bosnian war, retired sergeant Tom Hoppe, is one of those who says officials were snooping in his records in 2006.

Mr. Hoppe, who plans to protest by not wearing his medals on Remembrance Day, said no one has atoned for the violations of personal privacy.

In an audit released a few weeks ago, Ms. Stoddart gave the veterans department a thumbs-up, suggesting it had cleaned up its act.

Mr. Blaney’s letter startled New Democrat veterans critic Peter Stoffer, who said it calls into question the independence of the ombudsman.

“When he gets a request to look into something, that office should have the independence and the staff to do so,” Mr. Stoffer said.

Precisely why the privacy breaches occurred remains an unresolved issue, he added.

“They had a change of heart – why? There’s no question the government suddenly changed its mind and didn’t want the Ombudsman to look into it. Obviously they’re trying to hide something.”

Follow us on Twitter: @globeandmail

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories