Conservative Leader Stephen Harper is arguing that the NDP cap-and-trade plan to curb greenhouse-gas emissions will send pump prices soaring, citing a tweet from University of Calgary economist Jack Mintz.
But the Conservative critique of the NDP climate-change plan is evaporating.
“NDP cap-and-trade at $40 per carbon tonne will be a 10 cent hike in gas tax. See Olewiler-Mintz paper on Sustainable Prosperity website,” Mr. Mintz tweeted on Thursday, sparking the Tory attack on the surging New Democrats.
Mr. Mintz said his calculations show the NDP's proposal for a cap-and-trade system to restrict greenhouse-gas emissions would add 10 cents a litre to gas prices in the early days and 18 cents a litre by 2014.
There’s just one problem: The mini-missive assumed – wrongly – that the NDP would include the fossil fuels that consumers use.
The NDP is actually proposing a system that would encompass about half of the economy’s greenhouse-gas emissions, those from very large industrial emitters. Firms that produce oil, natural gas and coal would be part of the system, and would likely face increased costs for the energy they consume, and those expenses could be passed on to consumers.
But big energy firms would not have to bear the much higher cost for the eventual emissions from the fossil fuels they produce – and consumers would not have those higher costs passed on to them.
In an interview, Mr. Mintz said that his assertion of an increase in pump prices was based on the assumption that the NDP plan did encompass fossil fuels used by consumers.
He noted that a cap-and-trade system not including those emissions will be comparatively weak. “You’re not dealing with much emissions,” Mr. Mintz said.
Mr. Mintz said that a more limited cap-and-trade plan would be unlikely to generate the size of revenues that the NDP is projecting.
Mr. Mintz sits as an independent director on the board of Imperial Oil. However, he has been a vocal advocate for a wide-ranging carbon tax as the best solution for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.
Economic theory holds that the costs of any cap-and-trade system will eventually filter through to consumers, so it is accurate to say that any increase in costs for energy companies will flow through to consumers. However, without a simultaneous move to increase the cost of imported energy, domestic companies would not have much latitude to boost prices.
At the same time, Mr. Layton is raising the prospect that an NDP government would seek to regulate gas prices if his plan to appoint an ombudsman to investigate pump charges doesn’t work.
Mr. Layton said Mr. Harper hasn’t wanted to take on oil companies who, he said, seem to be colluding to raise prices.
Mr. Layton has already promised that if his party comes to power he would appoint an ombudsman to investigate whether gas retailers are colluding to “gouge” consumers – but he said Thursday that if that fails he will consider regulating the price that can be charged at the pump.
“This is the kind of option that we have discussed in the House of Commons before,” Mr. Layton told reporters at a press conference in Yellowknife.
“Our first step would be to establish the ombudsman and use the competition laws to go after collusion in the industry. If that doesn’t work, then we’re clearly going to have to look at further measures.”
The statement is likely to fuel debate about whose policies will make life more affordable, or more costly, for consumers. Mr. Layton proposed an ombudsman to appeal to those calling for the government to provide relief from price hikes at the pumps – but free-market critics will likely argue gas-price regulation is a heavy-handed intervention that won’t help consumers.
