Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Pierre Daigle, ombudsman for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces, pauses while addressing the media in Ottawa on Dec. 2, 2010. (Pawel Dwulit/THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Pierre Daigle, ombudsman for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces, pauses while addressing the media in Ottawa on Dec. 2, 2010. (Pawel Dwulit/THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Opposition sides with military ombudsman on access to cabinet secrets Add to ...

The federal Opposition has accused the Harper government of obstructing the work of the military ombudsman following reports Pierre Daigle was stonewalled in his request to view cabinet documents during several recent investigations.

NDP critic Matthew Kellway says Mr. Daigle is one of a growing list of watchdogs who are being prevented from doing their jobs.

More Related to this Story

The military ombudsman says he believes his mandate allows him to look at secret cabinet documents, as long as he doesn’t report on their contents.

However, he was blocked when his staff asked for documents related to the inability of National Defence to deliver on a promise to increase dismemberment coverage for part-time soldiers.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay flatly denied the ombudsman is being hindered and told the House of Commons that the department has an open and productive relationship with Mr. Daigle.

Former veterans ombudsman Pat Stogran ran into a similar fight with the Conservatives and obtained a legal opinion that said his mandate allowed him to look at secret documents, as long as they were used for context only.

Mr. MacKay says the government will continue to work with the ombudsman within the scope of his mandate and the law.

Quebec New Democrat Christine Moore suggested the government doesn’t want Mr. Daigle looking into matters such as care for reservists because it has reneged on its promises.

Mr. Daigle issued a report last week which detailed how only four out of 12 recommendations from a 2008 report by Mr. Daigle’s predecessor on reserve soldiers had been implemented. Another six were still being organized and two others had gone nowhere.

But Mr. MacKay insisted “progress has been made on 10 of the 12 recommendations.”

The question of what can be considered a cabinet secret is pretty straightforward. Documents put before ministers and used as the basis of a policy decision are deemed secret.

But as Mr. Stogran found out at Veterans Affairs, some departments stretch that definition to cover documents that might some day find their way into cabinet briefs.

The question of what the government considers secret in negotiations between the federal Treasury Board and National Defence over the dismemberment insurance for reservists remains unclear.

The chief of military personnel, Rear-Admiral Andrew Smith, told the Commons defence committee last week the matter is being revisited and “will go forward for consideration with any number of other issues that will go before the Treasury Board.”

Mr. Daigle’s report said Defence asked for the change, but was unable to convince the Treasury agency.

Liberal defence critic John McKay is mystified at log jam.

He said the government had four years to resolve it, but Smith suggested the overhaul takes time.

“There’s a significant amount of work and analysis that goes forward with staffing something of this nature and that has been going on at a pace consistent with my priorities related to the ill and the injured,” he testified last week. “We’re trying to make as best progress as we can on that.”

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobePolitics

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories