After months of tacit co-operation with rural vigilantes trying to drive out a cult-like drug cartel, the Mexican government has moved to permanently solve one of its toughest security problems with a plan to legalize the growing movement and bring it under the army’s control.
But the risks are high.
To succeed, the government must enforce military discipline and instil respect for human rights and due process among more than 20,000 heavily armed civilians before returning them home to the western state of Michoacan.
In other Latin American countries, similar experiments have created state-backed militias that carried out massive human-rights abuses as armed civilians turned to vengeance, or assisted in mass killings. The Mexican army itself has been accused of rights abuses during the more than seven-year war against organized crime that has seen it deployed as a police force in much of the country.
Vigilante leaders met Tuesday with government officials to hash out details of the agreement, which would put avocado and lime pickers with AR-15 semi-automatic rifles under army command. The Mexican military has a century-old tradition of mobilizing “rural defence corps” of peasants to fight bandits and uprisings in the countryside.
If the experiment works, it will resolve one of the thorniest dilemmas of the barely year-old administration of President Enrique Pena Nieto: how to handle a movement that sprang up outside the law but successfully took on a pseudo-religious drug cartel, the Knights Templar, that Mexican authorities had been unwilling or unable to take on for years.
Over the last year, the vigilantes, many former migrant workers who spent years in the United States, have seized a dozen towns terrorized by extortion, killings and rapes at the hands of the cartel’s gunmen. Members of the Knights Templar have tried to portray themselves as soldiers in a reincarnation of a medieval religious order dedicated to Christianity and the expulsion of abusive police from their communities.
In many instances, reporters have witnessed federal forces standing on the sidelines while the “self-defence” forces routed the cartel, and occasionally even aiding them by conducting joint patrols and manning highway checkpoints together.
Mexican experts so far have widely accepted the government’s late-Monday move, calling it a smart way to maintain the movement’s momentum against the Knights Templar while protecting the government against charges it was ceding the rule of law in the “hot lands” of Michoacan, a rugged Pacific Coast state of rich agricultural land and mountains studded by marijuana fields and methamphetamine labs.
But in other parts of Latin America, the news stirred traumatic memories.
Claudia Samayoa, a human-rights activist in Guatemala, said the thousands of deaths attributed to the army-backed Peasant Self Defence Patrols during the country’s 1960-1996 civil war are too fresh to allow for more paramilitary forces in the region.
“The cure is going to be worse than the disease,” she said. “It would be better not to go down that road, and instead strengthen law enforcement and the justice and public safety systems.”
Margarita Solano, of the U.S. risk-analysis firm Southern Pulse, said Mexico’s vigilantes have awakened memories of her native Colombia’s experience with self-defence forces such as the “Convivir” movement that fought leftist rebels in the 1990s. While the groups were initially welcomed, some were later accused of rights abuses. “I’m finding differences and certain similarities that are frightening,” Ms. Solano said.
Mexican authorities are portraying the legalization of the “self-defence” forces as a stop-gap measure: Unable to disarm the vigilantes because of the popular support they received after kicking the Knights Templar drug cartel out of much of the state, federal officials will now have to work with them to clean up the rest of the gang – and then convince the vigilantes to demobilize. The government has stressed the plan is temporary and said vigilantes will have to register their guns.
With self-defence checkpoints on most major roads in Michoacan’s hot lands, and armed vigilantes often drinking beer or smoking marijuana at their posts, there are ample possibilities for abuses.
But many Mexicans are less concerned than outsiders about wrongdoing by the vigilantes-turned-rural forces. They note there are fundamental differences between Michoacan, where relatively prosperous farmers are funding the vigilantes to fight drug cartel extortions, and Guatemala, Colombia and Peru, where poor farmers were pressed by right-wing governments into fighting bitter wars against leftist rebels.
In the rich, flat lands of Michoacan, “there aren’t any leftist guerrillas or poor farmers,” said Raul Benitez, a security expert at Mexico’s National Autonomous University. “Here there are well-off farmers fighting criminals.”
Unlike the vigilante movement in the neighbouring Mexico state of Guerrero, where self-defence forces are often anti-government, many of Michoacan’s vigilantes say they just want to get back the rich pasture and lime groves that the Knights Templar stole from them.
“The comparisons with Colombia, Peru or Guatemala are an aberration,” said Mr. Benitez. “Right now, the self-defence forces need the respect of the local residents and public opinion, so I think they are not going to commit any crimes now.”