Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Better Together leader Alistair Darling, left, greets Scotland First Minister Alex Salmond prior to Monday’s debate on Scottish independence in Glasgow, Scotland. (David Cheskin/AP)
Better Together leader Alistair Darling, left, greets Scotland First Minister Alex Salmond prior to Monday’s debate on Scottish independence in Glasgow, Scotland. (David Cheskin/AP)

Scottish leaders clash in final referendum debate Add to ...

Scotland’s pro-independence leader Alex Salmond won a final TV debate on Monday just over three weeks before a historic breakaway referendum, but it wasn’t clear if his combative performance would help him catch up in the polls. In a bruising debate before the Sept. 18 referendum, Mr. Salmond relentlessly talked over and at Alistair Darling, the leader of the “Better Together” anti-independence movement, and it was sometimes hard to hear what was being said.

More Related to this Story

With the campaign to break up the United Kingdom and sever Scotland’s 307-year union consistently trailing in opinion polls by an average of up to 14 percentage points, Mr. Salmond’s supporters were looking for a game-changing performance after he failed to sparkle in the first such encounter.

Mr. Salmond, 59, did much better this time.

In a snap Guardian/ICM poll released soon afterwards, 71 per cent of the more than 500 respondents judged that Mr. Salmond had won, against 29 per cent who said they thought Mr. Darling had triumphed.

Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University, a polling expert, also deemed Mr. Salmond had won. But he questioned whether the nationalist leader’s rhetorical victory would translate into a win at the ballot box.

“A debate doesn’t necessarily win you votes,” said Mr. Curtice, saying it had been notable for its lack of proper discussion about wider economic questions.

“My glance at the flash poll is that while Salmond was the obvious winner, it doesn’t seem to have moved votes at this stage,” he said.

Mr. Salmond got more cheers in Glasgow, Scotland’s biggest city, than Mr. Darling, 60, who attracted the odd groan.

But Mr. Salmond didn’t advance new arguments or land a knock out blow. Instead, over the course of a scrappy hour-and-a-half, he repeatedly interrupted Mr. Darling and asked him the same few questions time and time again, a tactic which unsettled the former British finance minister who at times audibly struggled to find a riposte.

“The eyes of the world are indeed focused on Scotland,” Mr. Salmond told the audience in an emotional opening statement, urging Scots to vote for full independence. “This is our time, our moment. Let us do it now.”

Scotland’s health service would be better off under independence, he argued, questioning whether the British government would give Scotland more devolved powers in the event that Scots reject independence.

Scotland already has its own parliament with control over policy areas such as education and health.

Mr. Salmond was helped by sympathetic audience members who heckled Mr. Darling, including one woman who told the audience not to trust a word that came out of Mr. Darling’s mouth.

Last time, Mr. Salmond came unstuck on the issue of what the currency arrangements would be for an independent Scotland. He advocates a formal currency union to allow it to use the pound, but has struggled to explain what he would do if what was left of Britain refused.

All three major Britain-wide parties have ruled out such a union; Mr. Salmond predicts that would change if there was a “yes” vote.

This time round, Mr. Salmond was more confident if equally vague on the currency issue.

“I want a mandate so we can go in with the will of the Scottish people, for the common sense option of a currency union,” he said.

“We cannot be stopped from using the pound anyway,” he argued, to loud applause from supporters in the audience.

Mr. Darling tore into Mr. Salmond for failing to spell out a “plan B” if the British government refused to formally share the pound, calling Mr. Salmond’s idea of using sterling informally “a nonsense option.”

“He can’t answer basic questions on currency. He can’t answer basic questions on tax and spend,” said Mr. Darling.

Trusting Mr. Salmond and his promises, which he argued wouldn’t provide Scotland with a sustainable future, was too risky a prospect, said Mr. Darling.

“He’s asking us to take his word for it. Well, I’m sorry I can’t,” he said.

The two men also clashed over how much oil was left in the North Sea and about the merits of siting Britain’s nuclear deterrent in Scotland.

Mr. Darling repeated the anti-independence campaign’s slogan, telling Scots they could have the “best of both worlds.”

“We do not need to divide these islands into separate states in order to assert our Scottish identity,” he said. “I say that we all have no option other than to say politely, respectfully, but firmly, no thanks to independence.”

Several recent polls have shown support for independence climbing a few points, but the most recent “poll of polls,” on Aug. 15, which is based on an average of the last six polls and excludes undecided respondents, found support for a breakaway stands at 43 per cent against 57 per cent for staying in Britain.

Follow us on Twitter: @globeandmail

In the know

Most popular video »


More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories