Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Saturday May 10, 2008

Columnist Neil Reynolds

Latest Columns 


The big myth about Big Oil

Largest U.S. producer doesn't even make world's top ten


The big myth about Big Oil

Quick quiz: Name the top three oil-producing countries in the world.For some reason, few people get this one right. The supplementary question is why? Could it be that popular mythologies make the correct answer appear impossibly wrong?


Cut your carbon footprint … take the car

Auto travel may be less carbon intensive than walking


Cut your carbon footprint ... take the car

British environmentalist Chris Goodall asserted last year, in his provocative book How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, that driving your car to the supermarket could be better for the environment than walking there.


U.S. cleans air, Canada blows smoke Lock

U.S. could fully achieve GHG goal two years early


U.S. cleans air, Canada blows smoke Lock

In 2006, the U.S. economy expanded at the real and robust rate of 2.9 per cent - a decent rate of growth for any advanced economy. Economic growth necessarily requires more consumption of energy, right? Economic growth necessarily requires more greenhouse gas emissions, right? Here's a quick QandA to test these environmental assumptions.


Climate policy frenzy leads nowhere Lock

Continental do-your-own-thing approach won't work


Climate policy frenzy leads nowhere Lock

Torys, the eminent Toronto law firm, distributed a bulletin the other day that described the cross-border frenzy to develop carbon emissions policies across North America. Provinces are working with provinces. States are working with states. Provinces are working with states. Other states are working with other provinces. These partnerships, Torys notes, are frequently pursued independently of either federal government.


Condemned by the perversity of tariffs Lock

Emergency responses made food crisis worse – as government-decreed fixes often do


Condemned by the perversity of tariffs Lock

In a report this month on the phenomenal increases in cereal prices around the world, the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reviewed the emergency measures that different governments have taken ''to limit the impact on food consumption.'' The price increases had continued, the FAO grimly observed, despite these measures. But that's precisely the problem, isn't it? The emergency responses made things worse - as government-decreed fixes often do.


Next Page

 

Back to top