Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

(Kevin Van Paassen/Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail)
(Kevin Van Paassen/Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail)

Economy Lab

Access to foreign markets the best path to innovation Add to ...

Expanded international trade and measures to encourage research and development (R&D) are two themes that are dealt with separately in the budget, but there are some important links between more openness to trade and innovation.



Research and development is costly, and much of Canada’s R&D policy framework is built around reducing those costs, most notably in the form of tax credits under the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) Program. Many observers have concluded that the SR&ED has been a costly disappointment: even though public spending under the SR&ED has been high by international standards, Canada still lags in international rankings of R&D and innovation.

More related to this story

The reduction of the SR&ED tax credits and the new emphasis on direct support for R&D is best viewed as an admission of failure on the part of the government and a willingness to experiment with another approach.



It remains to be seen if these experiments will do any better. ‘Direct support’ amounts to governments providing public money to companies that – in the government’s judgment – are best-placed to develop new, profitable products and technologies. It is by no means certain that governments have any particular talent in predicting trends in markets or technology, so there is a non-negligible risk that the money will simply go to those who are well-connected.



But reducing the cost is only one way of encouraging R&D. Another way to tilt the R&D cost-benefit calculus is to increase the payoff. And one of the ways of making innovation more profitable is to increase the size of the market to which the entrepreneur has access.



There is a well-established link between productivity growth and participation in international trade: firms – both Canadian and foreign-owned - with an international exposure have higher productivity, do more R&D and pay higher wages. Even though it is not presented as such, making it easier to gain access to foreign markets may be the most effective innovation measure in the budget.



In the know

Top videos »