Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

Canada’s wireless market is dominated by three companies - Rogers, Bell and Telus. (CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS)
Canada’s wireless market is dominated by three companies - Rogers, Bell and Telus. (CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS)

Economy Lab

Competition best for wireless industry? Maybe not Add to ...

The Harper government’s bid to stoke competition in the wireless industry was criticized by upstarts as still too protective of established players such as Rogers Wireless.

“It’s a total disaster,” Wind Mobile chief executive Anthony Lacavera said. “It gives the illusion that the competitive marketplace has been strengthened, but it will be a catalyst for consolidation and new entrants will be starved of frequencies.”

More related to this story

According to new research, consolidation of new entrants is precisely what the federal government should be aiming to achieve. The Royal Economic Society is holding its annual conference at the University of Cambridge this week. Among the papers presented is one by Yan Li and Catherine Waddams of the ESRC Centre for Competition Policy and the Norwich Business School at the University of East Anglia. Rather than a free-for-all, they conclude the optimal wireless industry includes no more than four or five companies.

Dr. Li and Prof. Waddams studied 22 mobile carriers from seven countries, including Canada, between 1998-2007, measuring technical efficiency, productivity gains and technological innovation. They determined that increased competition has an obvious positive effect on productivity and innovation. But the strongest results came not from widespread competition, but from oligopolies.

“The most robust finding is the positive effect on both levels and growth in firm efficiency of competition, which has profound implications for the design of markets,” the authors write. “In an area which is sensitive both from a political and business perspective, governments and regulators should encourage active rivalry between four or five firms, but extending such competition to more entrants may have little, or negative impact on the productivity of the participants.”

Canada’s wireless market is dominated by three companies. Rogers accounts for about 36 per cent of 25.8 million subscribers, according to CWTA data. Bell Wireless and TELUS Mobility each control about 28 per cent of the market.

Most economists would describe that arrangement as too cozy to spur significant gains in productivity and innovation. The Harper government apparently agrees. But in assessing the measures introduced by Industry Minister Christian Paradis, it is worth considering what the federal policy is trying to achieve: productivity gains that lead to better service and lower prices. That might best be done by creating the conditions to allow a couple of strong newcomers to thrive, rather than opening the door to lots of new companies that would struggle to take market share from the three established providers.

It’s a type of competition that Ottawa likes. Just think about the banks.

Follow on Twitter: @CarmichaelKevin

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories