Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

(SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS/SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS)
(SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS/SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Economy Lab

Canadians should demand a debate on CPI changes Add to ...

Toby Sanger is senior economist at the Canadian Union of Public Employees



The Globe and Mail has revealed that Statistics Canada has been quietly planning changes to the way it calculates its Consumer Price Index measure of inflation: something I warned about a year ago.

The technical details of these changes may only seem of interest to the pocket protector and calculator crowd, but the reality is they will affect all Canadians: from pensioners and hardhats to those wearing pinstripes.

More related to this story

The consumer price index is the single most important economic measure Statistics Canada produces. Hundreds of billions of dollars of pension payments, tax deductions, payments and credits are explicitly indexed to it in legislation and most workers wages are implicitly linked to it. Changes of a fraction of a per cent in the measurement of CPI could mean billions of dollars in annual savings for governments on one hand and lower incomes for pensioners, workers and taxpayers on the other.

The Bank of Canada estimated the CPI overstates inflation by 0.6 per cent a year because changes in the index don’t adjust as fast as consumers do to lower prices for goods or for improvements in quality of new goods.

The impact may be relatively small initially, but it cumulates rapidly. For instance, a 0.6 percentage point reduction in Old Age Security payments would save the federal government $210-million in the first year, but almost $3-billion annually in ten years. Increased revenues from a 0.6 per cent lower increase in the basic personal amount for taxes would increase the federal government’s revenues by $180-million in the first year, but more than $2.5-billion annually in ten years. These are just two of the dozens of federal tax thresholds, deductions and credits that would be affected.

For a worker with a starting income of $50,000 a year, a 0.6 per cent lower wage increase each year ads up to a cumulative loss of $18,000 over ten years.

There are legitimate arguments why CPI overstates inflation -- and certainly better measures of inflation should be welcomed. However, there are also many reasons why the CPI understates changes in the cost of living, but these are often ignored by those advocating changes.

For instance Canada’s CPI uses a new house price index for housing costs, which has increased at half the rate of resale homes. It doesn’t account for faster depreciation and technological obsolescence of most goods, such as computers and cell phones. Nor does it account for increased commuting times, reduced public services, increased environmental costs or quality of life factors. All these factors affect the real cost of living and should also be accounted for in changes to the CPI.

When the United States made major changes to its CPI in the 1990s, the Senate appointed the Boskin Commission to examine it. Despite the shortcomings of its report, at least there was public debate and discussion. Instead of unilaterally making changes behind closed doors, Ottawa should refer the issue to a public commission. Canadians deserve no less.

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeBusiness

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories