Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

Valued-added in the country’s farm sector quadrupled between 1978 and 2008, which contributed to lifting many rural farmers out of poverty, according to Scottish economist James Mirrlees. (Kevin Lee/Kevin Lee for The Globe and Mail)
Valued-added in the country’s farm sector quadrupled between 1978 and 2008, which contributed to lifting many rural farmers out of poverty, according to Scottish economist James Mirrlees. (Kevin Lee/Kevin Lee for The Globe and Mail)

Economy Lab

How rising food prices can ease poverty Add to ...

It’s a simple enough proposition: Food prices spike, and the poor suffer.







The World Bank, for example, routinely links the two. “Near Record High Food Prices Keep Poorest People on the Edge,” said the headline of the press release issued with its latest Food Price Watch, which showed global food prices were 33 per cent higher in July than a year earlier.

More related to this story







But what if the link between higher food prices and poverty isn’t so simple? What if surging food prices actually lift more people from poverty than they condemn to it?



James Mirrlees, a Scottish economist based at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, put these questions to a group of more than 300 young researchers at the Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences Thursday. It wasn’t a thought experiment.







China’s development miracle is well known. The poverty rate, as measured by the percentage of the population living on less than $1.25 (U.S.) a day, is approaching 10 per cent compared with about 40 per cent a couple of decades ago.







The sharp decline in China’s poverty rate is generally understood to be a product of the country’s export-driven growth strategy, which resulted in a mass exodus of peasants to factory jobs in urban areas.







Sir Mirrlees sees it differently. Rather than a story of urbanization, he believes China’s rise from the depths of poverty is a rural phenomenon.







One reason might have to do with land ownership. China’s government distributes land relatively equally, which spreads the benefit of rising property values broadly, rather than concentrating the gains in the hands of a relatively small number of private landowners, which tends to be the case in other emerging market countries.







But the bigger reason, according Sir Mirrlees, is simply the growth of China’s agriculture industry. Valued-added in the country’s farm sector quadrupled between 1978 and 2008, underpinning growth in the rural services. Labour input prices have held constant, while the acreage of irrigated land has increased 50 per cent and the use of fertilizer has skyrocketed. It’s China’s version of the Green Revolution.







Considered this way, do higher food prices help or hurt China’s countryside?







“If you have a very small farm and you have to sell food to pay for other necessities of life, then higher prices for food grains are just what you want,” Sir Mirrlees said. “There is no question that in China that was very important.”







Sir Mirrlees cautioned against applying China’s experience to other regions. Conditions are different in Africa and Latin America. But he was unequivocal on how you should evaluate those headlines that equate higher food prices with increased poverty. “Be skeptical,” he said.





 

Topics:

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories