Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

Going into the recession, the concern was that the rules had been tightened too much and that too many of those who had lost their jobs would find themselves ineligible for EI. (Dave Chan/Dave Chan for The Globe and Mail)
Going into the recession, the concern was that the rules had been tightened too much and that too many of those who had lost their jobs would find themselves ineligible for EI. (Dave Chan/Dave Chan for The Globe and Mail)

Economy Lab

EI solid during recession but struggling in the recovery Add to ...

The Employment Insurance (EI) reforms of the mid-1990s faced their first full-blown recession in 2008-09, and the EI program was the subject of a political psychodrama in the summer of 2009. Just how well did the new EI perform?



The goal of the reforms was to tighten up the eligibility rules: payments out of the old Unemployment Insurance (UI) program had become increasingly concentrated on a small number of repeat users. In the words of this HRSDC report, “the UI system [was]a transfer program from full-time workers to people who [chose]to work on a part-year basis.”

More related to this story



The changes to UI and EI in the 1990s were wholly successful in their goal of making it harder for people to claim benefits. Although more than 80 per cent of those who contributed to EI continued to receive benefits, the tightened eligibility rules meant that EI payments were made to a much smaller share of the total number of unemployed. Going into the recession, the concern was that the rules had been tightened too much and that too many of those who had lost their jobs would find themselves ineligible for EI.



As it turned out, unemployment increased by 450,000, and the increase in the number of EI recipients was somewhere around 70 per cent of that -- a share significantly higher than what the pre-recession coverage rate would have suggested.



But the most recent data are less encouraging: the number of EI recipients has almost returned to pre-recession levels, but there are still 250,000 more unemployed. EI coverage has gone below 40 per cent for the first time, possibly because of an increase in the number of people who have exhausted their benefits.



EI may have performed well during the recession, but for reasons that are not yet clear, it seems to be having problems dealing with its aftermath.



Stephen Gordon's recent posts and Twitterfeed can be viewed here.



Economy Lab, winner of the 2011 Eppy Award for best business blog. Follow Economy Lab on twitter

Follow on Twitter: @stephenfgordon

 

Topics:

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories