Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

AdChoices

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
for Globe Unlimited subscribers

Entry archive:

Without clear guidelines, the government's declaration that a possilbe strike by Air Canada flight attendants would be harmful to the economy amounts to selective meddling. (Della Rollins/Della Rollings for The Globe and Mail)
Without clear guidelines, the government's declaration that a possilbe strike by Air Canada flight attendants would be harmful to the economy amounts to selective meddling. (Della Rollins/Della Rollings for The Globe and Mail)

Economy Lab

Is Ottawa putting the right to strike at risk? Add to ...

Memo to Canadian workers: if what you do is “significant” to the economy or the general public, your right to strike is at risk.



That, at least, is the message federal Labour Minister Lisa Raitt has delivered as she prepares to order a quick end to a possible strike by Air Canada flight attendants -- the second time she's threatened back-to-work legislation at the airline this year.



“From our perspective, the government gets engaged when we see that there's going to be a nationally significant effect either on the economy or on the general public,” Ms. Raitt told CBC-Television.



Her remarks pose the question what other workers can’t strike in Canada? Just airlines? All workers at federally regulated industries? And is this a permanent ban, or a temporary ban, while the economy remains fragile?



It’s worth pointing out here that, however inconvenient or economically destructive strikes are, Air Canada is a private company. It’s no longer a Crown corporation. Air Canada has fierce national and international competitors on most routes -- companies that have an economic interest in what Ottawa does.



Does Ms. Raitt’s edict also apply to workers at Westjet and Porter Airlines, whose workers may want to unionize in the future?



What about railroad workers, truckers and telecom employees?



And why stop there. The lives of millions of Canadians would also be deeply affected if Tim Horton’s went on strike, or Molson-Coors.



What’s the value of belonging to a union if the most basic right of employees -- to withdraw service in the event of a contract impasse -- no longer exists?



We don’t know the answer to any of these vital questions because the Harper government appears to be making up the rules as it goes along.



It’s not the first time. Last year, the government blocked a foreign takeover of Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan in the face of popular anger in Saskatchewan. At the time, then-Industry Minister Tony Clement suggested the company was too important to the Canadian economy to let fall into foreign hands.



It’s a defensible position. But Ottawa has so far failed to clarify what’s for sale, and what’s not in Canada.



It amounts to selective meddling in the economy, without putting in place clear rules of the road. Ms. Raitt and the Harper government owe that Canadian companies and their workers.



Follow Economy Lab on twitter

Report Typo/Error

Follow on Twitter: @barriemckenna

Next story

loading

In the know

The Globe Recommends

loading

Most popular videos »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular