Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content


Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
for Globe Unlimited subscribers

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.

Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ECONOMIC INSIGHT section.

All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.

Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.


Economy Lab

Cutting youth obesity: There might be an app for that Add to ...

The rise in the rates of obesity among young people and its implications for public heath policy are the focus of an increasing amount of attention of policy makers. One instrument that might be useful in countering this trend comes from an unlikely source: the economics of social networks.

Several recent studies have documented important 'peer effects' in adolescent obesity: simply being part of the same peer group as obese adolescents is a significant factor in explaining weight gain. Could this be used as a basis for policy? Since peer effects work in both directions, social networks might also be used to amplify the effectiveness of a program that reduced obesity. But first, we would need a better understanding of how and why peer effects work.

A recent working paper (pdf) by my Laval colleagues Bernard Fortin and Myra Yazbeck looks at the mechanics behind those peer effects and find evidence that fast food is a plausible culprit. Their approach is to estimate the 'social multiplier' for peer effects of fast food consumption: a value greater than 1 implies a positive spillover effect as others seek to emulate their peers. They find estimates for the 'social multiplier' of around 1.5, which means that the decision of just two teenagers to consume fast food has the effect of inducing a third one to join in - and to suffer the consequences of her peers' decision.

In the language of public economics, this would suggest that fast food has negative externalities: the total social costs are not fully borne by the person who makes the purchase. And as with other activities with negative externalities - including greenhouse gas emissions - the simplest and most efficient solution is to tax it so that the consumer internalises the entire social cost.

The idea of a tax on fast food has already been raised in some policy circles. As we learn more about the causes of adolescent obesity, it may become an idea that will attract more attention.

Follow Economy Lab on twitter

Follow on Twitter: @stephenfgordon

In the know

Most popular videos »


More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular