Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

Columbia Universith professor Jeffrey Sachs at the Millennium Summit in Montreal in 2009.‘It is time to reconsider the revival’ of Keynesianism, Prof. Sachs told the Financial Times on Tuesday. (John Morstad For The Globe and Mail)
Columbia Universith professor Jeffrey Sachs at the Millennium Summit in Montreal in 2009.‘It is time to reconsider the revival’ of Keynesianism, Prof. Sachs told the Financial Times on Tuesday. (John Morstad For The Globe and Mail)

The search for a new Keynesianism Add to ...

They’re getting restive around the economics department at Columbia University in New York.

Democrats and Republicans are nearing agreement on the “fiscal cliff.” This, we assume, is reason to cheer. Yet there’s Jeffrey Sachs, economics wunderkind and head of Columbia’s Earth Institute, in Tuesday’s Financial Times declaring that we’ve got it all wrong.

More Related to this Story

“It is time to reconsider the revival” of Keynesianism, he says.

Prof. Sachs is in esteemed company. Nobel economist Edmund Phelps, another Columbia professor, used a speaking engagement hosted by the National Economists Club in Washington to call for a complete change in economic theory to bring about a change in U.S. political culture.

Prof. Phelps says the economic dynamism that separated the United States from the rest of the world for much of its history has been defused by a combination of “crude” Keynesianism and corporatism.

Keynesians, Prof. Phelps says, make the mistake of confusing the economy for a machine that can be “dialed up” by stoking demand.

Corporatists are driven to use economic policy to shape society. It’s a bi-partisan label. For Prof. Phelps, former president George W. Bush, with his big deficits and “free pills” for seniors, is as much a corporatist as Nancy Pelosi, the top Democrat in the House of Representatives.

Both approaches to economic policy have the effect of smothering innovation, says Prof. Phelps. The Keynesian urge to generate economic growth in the short term is out of sync with the forward-looking nature of modern business. In their rush to smooth rough patches in the economy’s trajectory, policy makers end up dampening business investment by creating an uncertain climate for innovation.

Prof. Sachs makes the same point, arguing that policy must align with the “investment cycle,” not over a year or even the business cycle.

“Trillions of dollars of public and private investments are held up for lack of strategy,” he argues in the FT. “The Keynesian approach is ill-suited to this kind of sustained economic management, which needs to be on a timescale of 10-20 years, involving co-operation between public and private investments, and national and local governments.”

Both Columbia professors insist they are neither theorists nor ideologues; evidence, they say, is on their side. Prof. Sachs points to the failure of President Barack Obama’s stimulus program to spark rapid job creation.

Prof. Phelps sees proof that the current economic paradigm isn’t working in the U.S.’s deteriorating productivity rate. With a tax system that is skewed heavily toward spenders, and entitlement programs inflating an average household’s sense of wealth, the entrepreneurial energy that made the U.S. the world’s biggest economy is all but snuffed out, Prof. Phelps says.

“You can’t have disruptive innovations if you are going to insist that you have to have smooth sailing,” Prof. Phelps said Monday evening. “You can’t have growth if your policies are anti-growth.”

For now, Profs. Sachs and Phelps are voices in the wind. They could remain so, as the U.S. electoral cycle is ill-suited for long-term policy making. Next year, lawmakers are poised to overhaul the tax code. That should create an opportunity for fresh thinking about U.S. economic policy.

Prof. Phelps would like to see the creation of a federal innovation bank for entrepreneurs modeled on the farm credit system. But new ideas like that will be up against a byproduct of the corporatist system that Prof. Phelps says has taken hold of Washington – special interests.

A corporatist system is run by elites, and elites can be lobbied.

Rather than a true overhaul, next year’s negotiation over the tax code promises to be a bloody fight waged by trade associations and corporate lobbyists bent on protecting the benefits they’ve won over the past few decades.

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories