Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

Sun illuminates the Peace Tower in Ottawa (Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Sun illuminates the Peace Tower in Ottawa (Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Economy Lab

The truth behind tax cuts: You might not be better off Add to ...

“Low taxes” is a theme of the Conservatives’ campaign, and they are keen to provide estimates for the reduction in the amount of taxes paid by a representative household under their government. But are lower taxes really the same thing as higher after-tax incomes?



Clearly, if the government chooses to reduce my taxes -- and only my taxes -- then I will be better off: my disposable income will rise while everything else remains approximately the same. And this logic is almost certainly the reason why calls for lower taxes are so popular. But to go on to conclude that if everyone’s taxes are reduced then total after-tax incomes will rise is to succumb to the fallacy of composition: the link between tax cuts and disposable income is much weaker at the aggregate level than it is for an individual.

More related to this story



An unspoken assumption behind many calls for smaller governments with lower taxes and lower levels of spending is that this policy recipe will encourage economic growth. However, the theory behind that conclusion is at best murky, nor is there much in the way of evidence to support it. In his survey of the empirical literature on the factors associated with economic growth, Columbia University economist Xavier Sala-i-Martin observes that,



“The size of the government does not appear to matter much. What is important is the ‘quality of government’ (governments that produce hyperinflations, distortions in foreign exchange markets, extreme deficits, inefficient bureaucracies, etc., are governments that are detrimental to an economy).”



This isn’t to say that tax policy is irrelevant: different sorts of taxes have different effects on economic growth. But it does deflate claims to the effect that low taxes are the key to prosperity.



Receiving a tax cut is like standing up at a concert in order to get a better view. It’s easy enough to see why an individual might be tempted. But if everyone does it, the gains become much less clear-cut.



Follow Economy Lab on twitter

 

In the know

Most popular videos »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular