Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Entry archive:

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke pauses during remarks about a shift in the direction of U.S. monetary policy at the Federal Reserve in Washington September 13, 2012. (JONATHAN ERNST/REUTERS)
U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke pauses during remarks about a shift in the direction of U.S. monetary policy at the Federal Reserve in Washington September 13, 2012. (JONATHAN ERNST/REUTERS)

Why the Fed’s latest move misses the mark Add to ...

No matter how hard the Fed pushes, the U.S. economy isn’t going to respond to yet another round of quantitative easing. What ails the U.S. economy is not the cost of credit. From car loans to mortgages, borrowing money has never been cheaper.

The Fed’s aim to stir the economy by printing more money is off the mark. Certainly boosting the money supply will have an affect, but it won’t be on domestic spending, as hoped, but on exports. Ben Bernanke’s explicit promise to keep interest rates at record low levels until at least 2015 will further devalue the U.S. dollar, thereby boosting the competitiveness of American exporters. That will be helpful, but keep in mind that exports are a relatively small component of the U.S. economy. The Fed would need to see truly phenomenal trade gains to achieve the results it seeks for GDP growth, let alone employment gains.

More Related to this Story

It’s an unlikely scenario given today’s weakening global economic environment. Moreover, the resulting currency appreciation against the U.S. dollar among America’s major trading partners will only exacerbate their own economic problems, while also dampening their appetite for American-made goods.

So what’s the harm in the Fed trying? Inflation is the traditional argument against central banks turning on the printing presses. Whether widespread price increases will take hold this time around remains to be seen. There is, however, at least one price that another round of quantitative easing is bound to send higher–the cost of oil.

Since oil prices are denominated in U.S. dollars, the lower the value of the greenback, the higher the price of oil. What’s more, any policy that is seen to boost economic growth is immediately bullish for oil prices. Note the knee jerk reaction for oil prices following the Fed’s policy announcement last week. The price of Brent crude, the de facto world price, hit a four-month high, while the price of West Texas Intermediate was pushed near $100 (U.S.) a barrel.

Oil traders may be wrong in believing that another round of quantitative easing will have any more lasting an impact on economic growth than previous rounds. But traders are absolutely right in recognizing that any increase in economic growth will boost the demand for oil, and hence its price.

We can’t grow our economies without burning more oil, but the growth we seek will eventually push the price of the fuel out of our economy’s reach. That, in a nutshell, is the quandary central banks are now facing. Unfortunately for the Fed, it’s about to learn once again that no amount of monetary stimulus is going to change that basic constraint on economic growth.

 

Jeff Rubin is an author and former chief economist of CIBC World Markets. His second book is The End of Growth. Read more from Jeff Rubin on his Globe and Mail page.

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories