Britain approved wide-ranging proposals to shake up the country’s banks, forcing lenders to form barriers between their retail operations and riskier investment arms to protect ordinary customers better in any future crisis.
The recommendations of the Independent Commission on Banking had been opposed by leading banks which lobbied hard against them, citing additional costs and red tape.
“The government will separate retail and investment banking through a ring fence,” Finance Minister George Osborne told Parliament.
“It’s important to know that this ring fence will not prevent banks from failing, but it does mean, if banks get into trouble, those elements of the banking system that are vital for families, businesses and for the whole economy can continue without resort to the taxpayer,” he added.
Mr. Osborne was giving his formal approval to plans laid out in September by the government-appointed ICB, which had proposed this ring-fencing model.
The government set up the ICB after the 2007-08 credit crisis saw Britain nationalize Northern Rock and pump £66-billion ($106-billion) into Lloyds Banking Group PLC and Royal Bank of Scotland .
The ICB, headed by Oxford University academic Sir John Vickers, also said banks should hold core capital equal to at least 10 per cent of risk-weighted assets, plus a further 7-10 per cent capital in the form of “bail-in” bonds.
There would also be limits to the extent to which a bank could use money in its retail arm for its investment bank, a move that will increase funding costs for British lenders.
Mr. Osborne said the Conservative-led coalition government backed the plans to make banks hold more loss-absorbing capital, setting a minimum 17 per cent capital requirement in this regard.
However, he added this would only apply to the U.K. operations of British banks – removing a potential disadvantage to HSBC Holdings PLC and Standard Chartered Bank, which make much of their profits in Asia.
“They’ve watered down a bit the capital rules for global banks on their overseas assets, so HSBC may find that the new regime is a bit easier than it might have feared,” said SVM Asset Management fund manager Colin McLean.
Mr. Osborne also called on RBS to cut its investment banking arm further, with public anger against investment bankers and their traditionally large bonus packages still high as increasing numbers of Britons face unemployment.
“RBS itself has made significant changes since 2008, including reducing the size of its investment bank by half. But I believe RBS needs to go further and the management agrees.
“RBS will make further significant reductions in the investment bank, scaling back riskier activities that are heavy users of capital or funding,” he added.
RBS and Barclays Bank PLC shares closed down by around 3 per cent. Lloyds fell 4.2 per cent, while HSBC ended down 0.5 per cent.
Mr. Osborne said the government estimated the costs of the ICB’s proposals at between £3.5-billion and £8-billion, although the banks say it could be greater than this.
The proposal on “bail-in” debt has been attacked by HSBC and Standard Chartered, which have threatened to quit their London headquarters for Asia.
While the government says taxpayers should not have to bail out lenders in the future, Prime Minister David Cameron also wants to ensure the regulations do not harm London’s standing as a leading financial centre. He vetoed changes to the European Union treaty this month to protect the City.
The ICB has said banks should have until 2019 to implement the proposals – in line with plans by the Basel committee of global banking regulators to impose tougher capital requirements on banks also by 2019.
Mr. Osborne said initial legislation on the ICB’s proposals would be completed by the end of May 2015.
The proposals would see Britain follow Sweden and Switzerland in setting a benchmark in capital rules on banks, since the size of each of those countries’ bank sectors is greater than their national GDP, creating a greater risk for taxpayers.
The issue of banking reform has caused tension between the Conservatives, who lead the coalition, and Liberal Democrats, with Business Secretary Vince Cable and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg fiercer critics of the banks than Mr. Cameron or Mr. Osborne.
Follow us on Twitter: