Reuters Breakingviews delivers agenda-setting financial insight. Its global correspondents react to stories as they develop, delivering sharp and provocative commentary on big financial news as it breaks. Click here to read more international insights.
Alexei Navalny rose to prominence as a Western-style shareholder activist in a country devoid of Western-style capitalism. He took apart Russian companies’ available statements and numbers to expose graft, corruption and embezzlement detrimental to investors.
This was bound to lead him to take on a political role, since the vices he denounces are an integral part of the Russian system. So instead of being brought into government, he is on trial on dubious charges in the latest of the Vladimir Putin’s attempt to muzzle dissent. This may be, in fact, a sign of the Kremlin’s anguish and weakness. Western governments and investors should take note.
Mr. Navalny’s trial opened on Wednesday in Kirov, 800 kilometres from Moscow, before a judge known for issuing only guilty verdicts. Prosecutors have twice previously rejected the case as groundless. It was revived by Russia’s top investigator days after Mr. Navalny revealed that a close Putin ally secretly owned property in the Czech republic.
It may be just a deliberate attempt to tar the reputation of the long-time anti-corruption activist and his followers with the rot that he is fighting against. Or it is another example of the Russian President’s well-known vindictiveness: Mr. Navalny has called for Mr. Putin to be tried in court and described the ruling United Russia party as one of “thieves and crooks” in the runup to the rigged parliamentary elections of 2011.
Still, that wouldn’t explain everything. The trial of rock group Pussy Riot last year and the recent hounding of non-governmental organizations because of what the authorities call “Western ties” have made it clear that Mr. Putin has begun to persecute dissidents as did his alma mater, the KGB, in Soviet times.
Mr. Navalny faces a jail term of up to 10 years. The absurdity of that potential sentence is by itself a sign of the Russian President’s insecurity. There are parallels with the later Mubarak era here. As Mr. Putin recedes further into his country’s past, investors may want to start thinking about the risks of investing in a potentially unstable future.