Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

AdChoices
An employee stacks boxes filled with merchandise for shipment at the Amazon.com Inc. distribution center in Phoenix, Arizona, on Nov. 26, 2012. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg)
An employee stacks boxes filled with merchandise for shipment at the Amazon.com Inc. distribution center in Phoenix, Arizona, on Nov. 26, 2012. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg)

Americans buying online can now spend 40 times more duty-free than Canadians Add to ...

Americans are now allowed to spend more than 40 times as much as their northern neighbours without paying duty on products shipped from abroad, as a result of a new law.

Last week President Barack Obama signed a bill vastly expanding the duty-free exemption for products imported by mail. The new US$800 limit quadruples the previous amount, which was already multiple times higher than Canada’s C$20 exemption.

Survey shows Saskatchewan has highest percentage of online shoppers (CTVNews Video)

There’s pressure on the Canadian government in the runup to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s trip to Washington to narrow that gap, with the pressure coming from pockets of the U.S. government and industry.

One business group has even sought to enlist Canadian customers by circulating an online petition asking people to add their names if they want to stop paying what it calls an unfair duty.

“The gap is unsustainable in our integrated economy,” said Maryscott Greenwood of the Canadian American Business Council, which started the petition.

“Canadians we hear from see it as a fundamental issue of fairness. Why should Canadians pay duty on the very same items Americans buy duty free?”

She and a U.S. federal source said American officials are raising the issue with their Canadian counterparts as they prepare for Trudeau’s state visit next month.

The Canadian government has grappled with it before.

As the House of Commons Finance committee gathered advice for the 2014 budget it received a submission from eBay – one of the biggest potential winners of a relaxed duty exemption.

The online retailer said Canada’s standard was far stricter than most other countries and noted that the $20 amount hadn’t been revised since 1985.

It said an increase would boost mail delivery, save Canada Post millions in administrative costs, and spare consumers from the sticker shock that occasionally comes with online imports.

The Senate Finance committee also called for the matter to be looked at in 2013.

The committee pointed to claims from the Canadian Association of Importers and Exporters, which said the average fee charged by most courier companies or customs brokers is $25, and that Canadians paid more than twice their American neighbours for a $21 online imported product back when the dollar was at par.

In an example of the fee breakdown, a Canadian Press employee based in Ontario recently bought US$208 worth of clothes online from a New York-based retailer; the shipping was an extra US$20, then there was a surcharge of US$62 meant to cover customs fees and federal and provincial taxes.

Canadian retailers have fought a policy change, warning it would come with a cost.

The Retail Council of Canada identified several potential negative consequences of an increase, and expressed relief that last year’s federal budget avoided such a change: “(It) would lead to massive increases in cross-border orders, with the obvious negative consequences for Canadian retailers and their employees,” the council said in reaction to the budget.

“Even a seemingly small increase could have a major impact.”

It said the federal and provincial governments would suffer a substantial revenue loss. It also argued that such a move would be a disincentive for Canadian companies to hire IT workers and invest in bricks-and-mortar businesses at home.

“(We do) not understand the political or economic calculus that would confer a tax and duty advantage (as high as 33 per cent in some cases) on a U.S. warehouse seller who employs few if any people in Canada, at the cost of a Canadian employer who does create jobs and economic activity here.”

Greenwood suggested a phase-in period might be a reasonable idea, if there’s concern in Canada about introducing the measure amid economic uncertainty. However, she added: “I don’t think it’s anti-stimulative to lower the costs of goods that Canadians are already buying.”

Report Typo/Error

In the know

The Globe Recommends

loading

Most popular videos »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular