Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

The lawsuit, and similar legal issues involving other technology companies, highlight the intense competition for talent in Silicon Valley. (KACPER PEMPEL/Reuters)
The lawsuit, and similar legal issues involving other technology companies, highlight the intense competition for talent in Silicon Valley. (KACPER PEMPEL/Reuters)

EBay settles with U.S. over pact to not poach employees Add to ...

The online commerce company eBay Inc. has agreed to refrain from making deals with other technology companies to not poach each others’ employees and by doing so limit workers’ access to better jobs, U.S. authorities said on Thursday.

EBay had been accused by the Justice Department of reaching an agreement with Intuit Inc., a software company best known for its tax preparation programs, to not recruit from each other.

More Related to this Story

“EBay’s agreement with Intuit served no purpose but to limit competition between the two firms for employees, distorting the labour market and causing employees to lose opportunities for better jobs and higher pay,” said Bill Baer, assistant attorney general for antitrust at the U.S. Department of Justice.

The lawsuit, and similar legal issues involving other technology companies, highlight the intense competition for talent in Silicon Valley.

In this case, eBay and Intuit reached a “handshake” agreement in 2006 involving executives including then-eBay chief executive Meg Whitman and Intuit founder Scott Cook, according to court documents. At the time Cook, who was serving on eBay’s board, complained about eBay poaching Intuit employees. Whitman is now chief executive at Hewlett-Packard Co.

Federal and state antitrust regulators sued eBay in 2012.

Intuit was not named as a defendant because it was already part of a wide-ranging 2010 lawsuit that federal officials brought against six technology companies, including Apple and Google. Those companies settled.

California also settled on Thursday with eBay, which agreed to pay the state $3.75-million (U.S.) to compensate people who were hurt by the no-poach agreements, among other costs.

EBay admitted no wrongdoing. It said in a statement that it believed that “the policy that prompted this lawsuit was acceptable and legal, and led to no anti-competitive effects in the talent market in which eBay competed.”

“EBay competes aggressively to attract and retain the best talent, while conforming to the hiring practices standards established by the Department of Justice in prior hiring-related cases against other companies,” the company added in the statement.

Asked about the eBay statement that it broke no laws, Baer told reporters: “We have no doubt that this was problematic conduct that violated the antitrust laws.”

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeBusiness

 
  • GOOG-Q
  • EBAY-Q
  • INTU-Q
  • HPQ-N
Live Discussion of GOOG on StockTwits
More Discussion on GOOG-Q
Live Discussion of EBAY on StockTwits
More Discussion on EBAY-Q
Live Discussion of INTU on StockTwits
More Discussion on INTU-Q
Live Discussion of HPQ on StockTwits
More Discussion on HPQ-N

Topics:

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories