Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

The General Motors logo is seen outside its headquarters at the Renaissance Center in Detroit in this file photo. (Jeff Kowalsky/Reuters)
The General Motors logo is seen outside its headquarters at the Renaissance Center in Detroit in this file photo. (Jeff Kowalsky/Reuters)

GM ranked worst auto maker by U.S. suppliers Add to ...

General Motors Co, already locked in a public relations crisis because of a deadly ignition defect that has triggered the recall of 2.6 million vehicles, has a new perception problem on its hands.

The U.S. company is now considered the worst big automaker to deal with, according to a new survey of top suppliers to the car industry in the United States.

More Related to this Story

The annual survey, conducted by the automotive consultant group Planning Perspectives Inc, asks the industry’s biggest suppliers to rate their relationships with the six auto makers that account for more than 85 per cent of all light vehicle sales in the United States.

Those so-called “Tier 1” suppliers say GM is now their least favorite big customer, according to the rankings, less popular even than Chrysler, the unit of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, which since 2008 had consistently earned that dubious distinction.

Suppliers gave GM low marks on all kinds of key measures, including its overall trustworthiness, its communication skills, and its protection of intellectual property.

The suppliers also said that GM was the auto maker least likely to allow them to raise prices to recoup unexpected material cost increases.

“As a result, GM is now the least preferred customer of suppliers,” PPI says.

Nissan Motor Co Ltd overtook Ford Motor Co for third place in PPI’s Supplier Working Relations Index, pushing Dearborn-based Ford into fourth place. Toyota Motor Co and Honda Motor Co Ltd finished in the No. 1 and No. 2 spots, respectively.

PPI, which has been conducting the survey for 14 years, says supplier perceptions of auto makers are critical because they can determine which car makers see the suppliers’ newest technologies first, get their best pricing and work with their best engineers.

John Henke, the head of PPI and a research fellow at Center for Supply Chain Management at Rutgers University, said the Japanese sweep of the top three places suggested the industry “could be entering an era in supplier relations that doesn’t bode well for the U.S. Big Three.”

The reason: the Japanese automakers are not just benefiting from a deterioration in relations between suppliers and the Big Three – they are actually rising in the estimation of their suppliers.

Toyota and Nissan, in particular, saw the percentage of suppliers who characterized their relationship with the two auto makers as “good or very good” surge.

GM, meanwhile, is in an especially unenviable spot, with 55 per cent of the suppliers surveyed characterizing their relations with the automaker as “poor to very poor,” up from 48 per cent last year.

One bit of good news for GM. When the list of car makers was expanded to include the three German auto companies, which have a far less significant market share in the U.S., suppliers said Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen AG were even harder to deal with.

But because BMW ranked second in the expanded list, just below Toyota but ahead of Honda, GM’s overall position fell to seventh place in the supplier’s best/worst rankings.

*****

If you have questions about driving or car maintenance, please contact our experts at globedrive@globeandmail.com.

Follow us on Twitter @Globe_Drive.

Add us to your circles.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeBusiness

 
  • TM-N
  • HMC-N
  • F-N
  • GM-N
Live Discussion of TM on StockTwits
More Discussion on TM-N
Live Discussion of HMC on StockTwits
More Discussion on HMC-N
Live Discussion of F on StockTwits
More Discussion on F-N
Live Discussion of GM on StockTwits
More Discussion on GM-N

More Related to this Story

Topics:

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories