Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Directors' share ownership plans

Globe and Mail Update

How much is just right? ...Read the full article

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

  1. Alex Todd from Toronto, Canada writes: There is not doubt that directors must have some skin in the game. In other words, they should assume appropriate risks and should benefit from appropriate rewards, commensurate with the company's performance.

    However, I would caution against boards that assume lower risks and benefit disproportionately from higher returns than other stakeholders (namely shareholders). Directors should be required to own shares of the company that they purchased with their own money. Since they have more control over the performance of the company than do other shareholders (and therefore enjoy a lower risk of ownership) they should proportionately increase their risk of holding the shares by paying a premium for them. That premium could be paid back to them by the company in the form of directors' fees and performance incentives to even out the risk-reward equation over time. It seems to me unreasonable that directors should be allowed to benefit disproportionately over other stakeholders (shareholders) from a risk-reward perspective.

    Alex Todd
    President & CEO
    TE Research
    TEResearch.com

Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to top