Posted AT 6:33 AM EST on 25/10/06
Yanking motives from the anti-terrorism law
Tenuous reasoning, harmless result.That, in short, is what a self-described overworked judge from Ontario delivered yesterday in his pruning of Canada's five-year-old anti-terrorism law. Mr. Justice Douglas Rutherford of the Ontario Superior Court probably did the fight against terrorism no harm when he stood up for those who express unpopular opinions; but whether he really helped civil liberties is unclear.
The full text of this article has 586 words.
To continue reading this article, you will need to purchase this article.
Already have a member account? Login now
Pay-Per-View Offers To read the complete article, select one of the following options
Purchasing from globeandmail.com is quick and secure.
Test yourself
- The week in questions
- What's new about Girl Guide cookies?
Collected Wisdom
- The veritas on vino
- Does uncorking wine to let it 'breathe' make a difference?
4
Globe Columnists
- Insight, analysis and opinion
- The Globe's regular columnists
-
Christie Blatchford:
General Interest
-
Murray Campbell:
Queen's Park
-
Marcus Gee:
International Affairs
-
John Ibbitson:
The United States
-
Roy MacGregor:
This Country
-
Lawrence Martin:
From Ottawa
-
Gary Mason:
British Columbia
-
Rex Murphy:
General Interest
-
Rick Salutin:
From the left
-
Doug Saunders:
Reckoning
-
Jeffrey Simpson:
National Affairs
-
Margaret Wente:
General Interest
Munk Debates
- Farrow, Hillier face off
- The Munk Debates pitted the humanitarian actress against the battle-tested general
2
- Mia Farrow: We owe them protection
- The case for humanitarian intervention
27
- John Bolton: Aspirations don't make foreign policy
- The case against humanitarian intervention
32
GlobeSalon
- Globe panel on Obama's historic U.S. election win
- Prominent Canadians debate the issue in this online feature
24
- Eminent Canadians on 'what next' for Canada?
- Prominent Canadians debate the issue in this online feature
36
- What do you think of China as Olympic host?
- Prominent Canadians debate the issue in this online feature
81
- When is an apology not enough? or too much?
- Prominent Canadians debate the issue in a new online feature
98
The Grano Series
- In the U.S., 'ordinary leadership will not be sufficient'
- David Gergen is uniquely positioned to size up the men and woman who would be president
8
-
Video:
David Gergen
Society
- Who's who gathers for Grano lecture
- The main attraction was Oxford and Harvard history professor Niall Ferguson
