Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Checking in with the format wars

Things are getting ugly in the video format wars.

Today, the two camps in the high-definition DVD battlefield — Blu-ray and HD DVD — lobbed large rocks through each other’s picture windows. For its part, Sony, maker of the Blu-ray format and part of the consortium pushing it, signed a contract with Target, the mass-merchandising store. A story by Reuters says the contract calls for Target to carry only Blu-ray high-definition DVD players through the Christmas holiday shopping season, which should seriously hurt sales of players of the HD DVD format.

Within hours of Sony’s move, Microsoft announced that it’s slashing prices for the Toshiba-created HD DVD player offered as an add-on to Xbox 360 game consoles; as of Aug. 1, Microsoft will sell it for $179 (U.S.), down from $199. Between Aug. 1 and Sept. 30, Microsoft will also toss in five free HD DVD movies, chosen by customers from a list of 15 titles, among them Apollo 13, Seabiscuit, Constantine, Casablanca, We Were Soldiers, U-571 and Blazing Saddles.

But Sony’s announcement was soon tarnished; it had apparently fudged the details of its deal with Target. The deal isn’t quite as exclusive as it sounded.

Ken Graffeo of HD Strategic Marketing for Universal Studios Home Entertainment, issued his own statement today: “Target will continue to carry the Xbox 360 HD DVD drive as well as HD DVD titles so we don’t see much of a change in their plans to carry both formats.”

Target stores, he added, “continue to sell Toshiba HD DVD players on their website. Sony appears to have bought an end cap, just as HD DVD has in retail stores such as Best Buy and Circuit City.”

So from the HD DVD camp’s perspective, Sony’s just blowing smoke. But the HD DVD boosters can’t ignore another retailing coup for Sony: a few months ago video rental company Blockbuster said it would be favouring Blu-ray movies in 250 stores because its customers were choosing Blu-ray titles more than 70 per cent of the time.

And the pro-Blu-ray camp’s spirits were also raised by a report from high-tech market analysts at Texas-based Parks Associates, who — also today — released their opinion that Blu-ray is winning.

In its paper Next Generation DVD Players: Will History Repeat?, Parks analyst Chris Roden said that “consumer confusion” is prevalent, with less than 10 per cent of U.S. consumers stating that they are familiar with the HD DVD or Blu-ray formats. 

Roden did not specify how so much consumer confusion can translate into a victory for Blu-ray, but he continued to say he is seeing the pendulum swing slowly that way, partly because of Sony’s decision to include the Blu-ray player in its PlayStation 3 gaming console.

“Recent retail developments, support from major Hollywood studios, and inclusion of the format in the PlayStation 3 [put] the Blu-ray format in the lead."  

Does this mean the end of the war is night?

Not by a long shot.

Sales of Sony’s PlayStation 3 have been slumping recently, forcing exective reshuffling at Sony's HQ, and there have been some major defections from the Blu-ray ranks — Samsung announced it would make players that play both HD formats, as did Korean electronics maker LG.

All this suggests Blu-ray’s fortunes are resting more heavily on manufacturers other than Sony in the Blu-ray consortium.

For its part, Microsoft decided to separate the HD DVD player from the Xbox, meaning it’s reaching for a larger market segment to carry the HD DVD product.

In terms of content, Sony owns two major Hollywood studios — Columbia and MGM — and has support from Disney, Lionsgate, and 20th Century Fox. On the other side, Universal Studios and the Weinstein Company are backing HD-DVD, and they have their own list of attractive movie titles. The remaining studios (Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks, Warner Bros. and New Line Cinema) are playing it safe, offering their movies in both formats until a winner emerges.

This all suggests the fate of the two will be the format that is chosen by the studios that make the most popular movies.

That’s too simple — there is one major factor being largely ignored here. In falling into the inevitable trap of comparing the Blu-ray vs. HD DVD conflict to the one in the 1970s and 1980s, in which Sony’s Betamax format lost a bitter fight to VHS, analysts tend to ignore the digital revolution that has taken place since.

Two decades ago, it was a simple matter of how many people would buy one or the other kind of videotape player.

Today, however, the real decision is not only at the mercy of movie moguls, but might be decided by PC manufacturers, who will be choosing which DVD drives go in their multimedia machines. There are a lot of them, and their ranks are supported by Microsoft and Intel.

And those guys are digging in for the long haul.

This is going to be a long war.

  1. Big M from Calgary, Canada writes: This one really irks me. I am the perfect target customer for these folks. I have an HD DLP projector, 9-foot screen and over 500 DVD movies purchased in my collection. The original DVD was the fastest adopted technology in the history of mankind. It was because everybody played nice and designed ONE standard. Now with High-def that standard needs to evolve. Two competing standards is moronic. Even though I own an XBOX-360 I will NOT be buying their HD Drive - nor will I buy Blu-ray or PS3 just because I HATE format wars. As a result I will NOT buy any movies in HD. Not until there are cheap dual-format machines - and they'd had at least 2 generations to mature. I will give them plenty of time to bask in their own stupidity. Oh - and most people can't even hook up the stuff they have. I just came back from a co-worker's house last night. Nice widescreen TV - but the DVD player was set for 4:3 (default) not 16x9. She almost fell off her chair when I changed it and she & her husband saw the difference. It was set up wrong for 3 years. Perhaps they should educate people on the stuff they sell. It's even worse for surround sound equipment - wrong cables, wrong set up (often by the store professionals) - simulated surround not real. Sad situation.
  2. I B from Canada writes:
    There is no doubt a serious lack of technology savy in the consumer market and HD has more problems than just HD DVD and Blu-ray. That's just a drop in the bucket. TV technologies, receivers, cables, DVD players, different versions of HDMI (all with their own certified cables), HDCP... all of them are becoming much more complex than the average consumer can handle.

    Until people can get their heads wrapped around the alphabet soup and actually decide what they want HD adoption will be slow and painful.

    As for the format wars... I'm sitting this one out until I can get my hands on a decent quality dual format DVD player so I won't have to worry about who wins out. I favor HD DVD for media (better quality transfers and better interactive content) but I refuse to go with any HD disc until I am sure that my player can handle the competing format in case my choice loses.

    It's sad because I'd like HD and I also have a library of 300 movies (which grows rapidly if there is worthy content on the market) but the industry will have to get their act together before I consider upgrading.

    I B
  3. Adebisi TheGamer from Canada writes: Consumers will never get their heads around the alphabet soup, as you describe it. Nor should they have to.

    And if you think researching the different standards increases someone's chances of early adoption, guess again.

    Most people who actually research the issue have come to realize that A) the technically superior standard is not always the winner and B) that they could spend a lot of money and end up with the losing standard in 2 years, and have to start over.

    The more you know, the less likely you are to buy, unless you absolutely must have HD movies now.
  4. Aidan Crawford from Toronto, writes: My DVD player just died after 3 years, and I'm more likely to buy the HD-DVD because it's cheaper. If the format wars are a "long haul" battle and my side loses - it'll be time for me to upgrade again anyway.

    In the meantime, I'll at least get to start using some of the features I purchased my new TV for.
  5. Chris Brand from Canada writes: Personally, as soon as one of them dropped the DRM, I'd go out and buy it. Until they let me do what I want with the content I'm buying (make backup copies, move it through my house's network, etc), I'm not going to support them.

    That probably means that I'll be sticking with DVD until I have no choice (by which time one of the HD formats will be dead anyway).

    The electronics companies need to grow some balls and recognise that their industry is ten times the size of the content folks - they can force the content industries into supporting what the customers want.
  6. Damien T from Toronto, Canada writes: The article is a bit inacturate. It states that Microsoft is staying out of the next-gen format war. This is not true, Microsoft has chosen a format, digital media.

    Microsoft is promoting movie and TV downloads onto the 360 hardrive. They also came out with a 120 GB HD, which is bigger than Sony's newest 80 GB HD. All you gotta do to get high definition in your home is buy a 360 and purchase HD content from XBOX Live. Gone are the days of switching discs every time you want a new movie, when you can store your content on a hardrive, you just use a remote to switch movies. Heck, with XP Media Center Edition or Vista, you can just stream content directly to your 360.

    The HD format war is a bunch of corporate BS!! For years the industry has been fighting technology instead of embracing it, and now the consumers have decided on the next format. Digital media.

Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to Kapica's Cyberia

Back to top