- Post a comment
- Skip to the latest comment
- Back to the blog
With oil prices stuck above $80 (U.S.) a barrel and utility bills rising to painful levels, Europeans are paying more attention to conservation. The good news is they are already much more sensible users of electricity, cooking gas, auto fuel and water than the gourmand North Americans, thanks to high energy taxes and sheer force of habit. We moved to Italy six months ago and we’ve picked up their conservation lessons in a hurry. We’re amazed at how fairly modest changes in lifestyle can add up to a lot of savings.
Take shopping. When we moved into our apartment in Rome, the fridge made us laugh. It was tiny – no more than a third the size of the swing-door monster we had in Toronto (imagine the rear doors of a Chevy Suburban). Our first thought was to fling midget fridge out the window and get one big enough to accommodate the usual 50 litres of milk and juice, 187 hamburger patties, dozen rotting heads of lettuce, full case of beer, six ice trays and a bucket or three of ice cream.
We decided to hold off. Good thing too, because the Italians practice just-in-time shopping. You buy what you eat that day, not tomorrow or a week from tomorrow. No one has heard of meal planning here. You go to the local market and whatever looks fresh in small quantities. Eggs for example. I went to buy a dozen eggs. The old lady who sells eggs at the local market looked at me like I was wearing an omelet on my head. How many in your family, she asked. Four, I said. She handed me a pack of six eggs and instructed me to return for another six when the first six were gone. You cannot buy packs of a dozen here. You can buy eggs individually.
The same goes for fruit and vegetables. They are bought for consumption today, maybe tomorrow, but never beyond that. The point being, you don’t need a great beast of a fridge. Chest-style freezers are unheard of. The U.S. Energy Information Agency says American fridges suck about 14 per cent of household electricity, second only to air conditioners. In Italy, I’ll bet the figure is half that.
The other point about buying in small quantities is that you don’t need a huge car – make that any car – to haul your food home. Romans shop on the hoof. There are supermarkets in Rome, but they are about the size of a Mac’s corner store and never have parking. I wouldn’t exactly call Romans, Italians in general, green champions, but they’re not keen on plastic bags. They use shopping carts. Supermarkets often charge for bags.
Italians know how to conserve on air conditioning too. AC is becoming more common in Italy, but it is still relatively rare by North American standards. So how do Italians deal with the African-style heat that wallops the country for much of the summer? The answer: Window shutters.
Every window and exterior door in our apartment has slatted wooden shutters; pulleys are used to raise and lower them. We assumed they exist for security reasons, which is only partly true. Their other use is to keep the sun out. When the sun gets mean, the shutters go down. It works. We rarely used our air conditioner in the summer in spite of many days of mid-30s temperatures, though we capitulated in the high 30s (the temperature hit 42 one day in August). I can’t say we were entirely comfortable. But nor did we face an electricity bill that would have eliminated our next holiday.
Italians save money on cars by buying small. We bought a Fiat Grande Punto, a clever design that packs a lot of room in a small body. The car is 4-metres long and weighs a bit more than 1,000 kilos (one tonne or 2,200 pounds). It is perfectly adequate for 99 per cent of our trips and a delight to park. Compare the Punto, say, to a popular American car like the Chrysler 300. The Chrysler is a full metre longer, about 750 kilos heavier and not significantly roomier inside. Engineers can tweak engines until their eyes melt to improve fuel efficiency, but the truth is reducing weight is the easiest and best way to cut fuel consumption.
In Europe, fuel prices are about double North American prices. Yet our gasoline bill has not climbed because the Fiat, with its high-revving 1.4-litre, 4-cyclinder engine, goes about twice as far on a litre of gas than the V-6 pig we drove in Canada. Carbon dioxide emissions are lower too. (Incidentally, every car’s CO2 emissions per kilometre traveled have to be plainly listed. In Rome, cars that exceed a CO2 threshold cannot be driven some days of the month.)
Europe’s relatively modest energy use is no myth. A few years ago, the OECD measured Canada’s per capita energy and was not impressed. It found that Canada ranked a lowly 27th out of the 29 countries measured. On average, each Canadian’s annual energy consumption was the equivalent of 6.2 tonnes of oil. The OECD average is half that.
Italians would love to become energy pigs too. But they can’t afford it. And an enlightened few of them realize their cheapo ways are less environmentally destructive. So bring on the shopping carts, the window shutters and the tiny cars. They work a marvel.
-
west slope from Greater Vancouver, Canada writes: Great stuff Eric!
It is stunning to think of the ecological, economic and energy-security problems that could be solved if North Americans adopted European level excise taxes on energy, particular petroleum products, and eliminated energy subsidies for consumers, farmers, commercial (sic) fishermen and other special-interest groups.
European-level excise taxes on gasoline implemented over several years would likely make Americans significantly richer on a per capita basis.
Higher energy excise taxes or Pigouvian taxes or "green taxes" or "carbon taxes"--all essentially the same thing--would be much easier to implement and more effective than tradeable CO2 emmission quotas. Moreover, the two approaches can easily co-exist.
Enjoy Italy!- Posted 11/10/07 at 3:01 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Neil Fenna from Edmonton, Canada writes: Just wondering Eric, how many of your greenie points did you squander on aimlessly roaring around the other day in a 12 cylinder Scuderia? Seems like some Europeans are fossil fuel gluttons too, and the habit is only entrenched by media reports glamourising power toys.
- Posted 11/10/07 at 3:42 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
bill wilson from Taiwan writes: In a free market, capitalist economy, it is all about price...and politicians should engrave that onto their heads. There is no sense trying to get people to go green using logic alone. The easiest and most effective way is simply to make it too expensive not to be green. Up the taxes on poor behaviour, subsidize good behaviour. Easy enough.
As for your energy stats remember that a lot of Canadian industry is energy intensive (especially the oil sands) and as most of these products are for export, they should not be counted as Canadian energy consumption. By the same token we should be allocated our share for the energy consumption of goods we import. In that way the US for one would look a lot worse and Canada would look a bit better. After all the end user should be the one charges with the energy use, for without them there would be no "product" being made.- Posted 11/10/07 at 8:37 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
adam m from Minneapolis, United States writes: You have some good observations about central city life in Italy. However, European cities have grown (sprawled) in the past 50 years in similar fashion to N. American cities. The supermarket with attached sea of parking does exist all across Europe - just not in the compact center of Rome. The auto dependant suburban neighborhood also exists. And more often than not the more Americanized lifestyle is the cheaper way to live in Europe because housing is so expensive in central Rome or London, etc. My European friends would love to abandon their cars and live the lifestyle you now enjoy....they just can't afford the rent. Not so different from New York or Toronto.
- Posted 12/10/07 at 1:41 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
I Graham from Golden BC, Canada writes: Euro perspectives on lifestyle and energy are valued lessons which we are challenged to accept. Our history and growth in North America in the past century was enhanced by cheap energy, vast areas of lightly populated lands and modern independent transport infrastructure. Euro experience and development was based on an age when these modern technologies, energy, and conveniences were not yet available. Some day when real rationing of energy resources occurs, our current lifestyles will be challenged when we have less available, and become more dependent on locally produced goods, services and skills. Keep the Euro sensibilities coming!
- Posted 14/10/07 at 9:35 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Rational Voice from Canada writes: Read the article before going to Europe a couple of weeks ago. So I rented a tiny car and used curtains windows for A/C. Just wish Ford and GM would import some of their real gems over here, particularly those with Diesel engines. Bill Wilson is right, price is the ONLY thing that matters to curb consumption for the masses and you can see it over there with gas hitting close to $1.80-2.00/litre.
- Posted 07/11/07 at 8:35 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment
This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?
You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!
Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

