Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Taser video is journalism in the raw

The term "citizen journalism" sounds like an elaborate concept, involving groups of citizens who sign up for some sort of advanced program and then go forth and report on news events -- with a "Digital Press" card in their fedora perhaps. In reality, however, it's average people with cellphone cameras and digital videocams, taking footage of events that occur around them. A great example is the video clip of Robert Dziekanski being Tasered by the RCMP at the Vancouver airport, which you can see for yourself on globeandmail.com, or at dozens of other websites and on television.

Paul Pritchard happened to be in the airport waiting for a flight, and was watching as Mr. Dziekanski became more and more agitated at being separated from his mother, who apparently was unaware that he had arrived and was still being kept behind the security doors (it was his first plane flight and he didn't speak English). His video is disturbing not so much for the images of Mr. Dziekanski writhing in pain -- although those parts of the video are difficult to watch -- but for the almost complete lack of attempts to calm the victim before he is Tasered not once but twice.

In fact, the first nine-tenths of the video is just Mr. Dziekanski walking around behind the security barrier, obviously distressed but not actually violent. At one point a woman goes up and tries to speak with him, and then leaves. Security officers mill around, but not much else happens until the police get there. The Tasering seems even more violent because of the complete lack of activity leading up to it -- something that a simple clip from the video as run on the evening news would likely not make as obvious.

This is one of the main benefits of a "citizen journalist" video such as Mr. Pritchard's: there is no editing. And despite the attempts by the RCMP to keep the video to themselves -- Mr. Pritchard went to court to force them to return the video to him, as they had promised to do when he provided it -- it is now available for anyone to see and make up their own minds about what happened. Sites such as NowPublic.com (based in Vancouver) provide an easy way for people to make their videos and photos of news events available almost as soon as they occur, and projects such as journalism professor Jay Rosen's OffTheBus (a joint effort with Huffington Post) are an attempt to apply that model to political reporting.

Broadly speaking, the phenomenon of "citizen journalism" isn't that new -- after all, the Rodney King video incident took place almost 15 years ago, and the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination was arguably one of the first examples -- but it is becoming more and more common, and that will likely continue to reshape the way we look at media, and the way media looks at us.

  1. Opinionated One from Canada, Canada writes: I really hope the police officers involved get the punishment they deserve. They didn't make a single attempt to calm down the obviously confused man. It appears they had absolutely no training on deciding when using such a last-resort, brutal method of control could be used. Heads should roll and the VP should pay up big time for this.
  2. ken g from mississauga, writes: If they were not cops this would be considered manslaughter. Were they hired from Blackwater?
  3. Mike Savo from Ontario, writes: I agree with the two above comments. I just e-mailed the Vancouver airport authority and the RCMP to let them know how angry and disguisted I am with both of these organizations. Watching the video, I can't believe that the RCMP officers would tazer this man, he was not a threat to himself, he was not a threat to the police officers. I can't believe that the airport wouldn't have had people to greet this man and to help him. As for the mother wanting to get in the arrivals area to help her son find out his way, I used to work at a Canadian airport and as long as the person passed through screening and had security escort the person. My thoughts and prayers go to the mother and I hope both organizations pay for what happened to this innocent man.
  4. Ross Snowden from Hamilton, Canada writes: I believe this will cause far too many people to jump to conclusions without knowing all the details. A video will not tell the whole story. Already we have one reader who hopes the officers get the "punishment" they deserve. Already guilty.

    Whether or not the RCMP followed protocol, or whether or not their actions were warranted in this situation, it would be unwise to jump to any conclusions at this time.
  5. Better to light a small candle than to sit and curse the darkness from Canada writes: Ingram said, (citizen journalism) "is becoming more and more common, and that will likely continue to reshape the way we look at media, and the way media looks at us."
    ***************************************************
    It doesn't seem to influence the way that the police act in public places. Sometimes it is useful to have police officers that are not that bright. On the other hand I am concerned that when there are officers who are not that bright then we are all of us in some danger.
    CYMRO
  6. dominic solntseff from Ancaster, Canada writes: I too have emailed the Vancouver RCMP and the Vancouver Airport to let them know how discusted I am.

    It was hard to find the words to express the level of discust and remain respectful and professional.
  7. Niki Reding from surrey, Canada writes: I just watched the video and I am disgusted. What happened to being a human? The RCMP acted like they were dealing with an animal and not a human being that was distressed. Why aren't they taught conflict resolution. This was going to be the biggest day of this man's life, and it became his last. As a mother myself I feel for the mother of this man. I too immgrated from Poland many years ago and I can attest as to how scared and lost you feel not speaking the language in a place were everything is so foreign. I don't believe that in 10 hours that Robert's spent at YVR there was no Polish translator found. All the staff had to do was go to yellow pages. Someone messed up and a life was taken!!! Someone has to be held accountable for it. No excuses!!! I don't uderstand the officers. Bouncers at bars have to know how to take down people without guns or tasers, so why is that not being taught to the men and women keeping us safe?Why are they relying on weapons before they try other venues?
  8. Smedley Backwash from Victoria, Canada writes: Another thing related to this story: Vancouver Int'l Airport and the layout, and "flow" for international arrivals SUCKS! If I arrived to a country jet lagged, without rest, and not understanding the language, I can see how this guy got into a panic state. The signage is not clear, and getting to domestic flights is stressful.
    I can see how YVR layout may have contributed to this tragedy.
  9. T Tichelar from Canada writes: I watched with horror the tazering death of Robert Dziekanski and would like to offer perspective to the debate that "heads should roll". There is clearly more than police action here, there is systemic inaction. The unfortunate aspect of this "citizen journalism" is that conclusions are being drawn prior to an examination of the facts and examination of protocols. We should be asking systems questions: How did this man get left in the secure area for hours without appropriate translators being called? Why was he not identified as needing help? How did his mother not have access to him just feet away from him? Why did airport personnel not seek this man out to find him when his mom was looking for him? Did the police act appropriately given the known circumstances at the time? Where does tazering fit into non-lethal use of force ie what attempts should be made to calm the situation prior to it's use? The police entered a volatile situation with a man that was potentially violent, they acted decisively, but whether or not they acted appropriately needs to be evaluated. Let's not assign blame too early. This mans accidental death is unfortunate, unintended and like many deaths in tazering has been attributed to agitated delerium. Clearly there is harm in tazering, but to draw the conclusion that the police officers are to blame for this misses the systemic issues that led up to this unfortunate outcome. Let's get the facts, let's look at the systems issues, let's look at the protocols on non lethal use of force and when these are evaluated let's establish systems that prevent this from happening again. To draw the conclusion, at this time, that all tazering is inappropriate at anytime, will certainly put police officers in harms way.
  10. Rick Hoff from Calgary, Canada writes: I have a lot of respect for police officers; the number of abusive people that they have to deal would drive most of us crazy. But this just seems so different - can't you imagine a scene where a RCMP officer approaches this man, with a few calming gestures and a little communication finds out he's Polish, and calls security to locate somebody in the airport that could speak with him?

    At some point there has to be a public recognition that police officers do make mistakes before these types of incidents can be prevented. The response is always the same from police departments - they just don't seem to think they are EVER at fault.

    This is horrible, just horrible. Robert Dziekanski is DEAD.
  11. Joey Tavares from Toronto, Canada writes: "To Serve And Protect". I am so ashamed as a Canadian. I feel so sorry for the Dziekanski family. I cannot believe that this happened.

    Systemic questions indeed.

    If these officers are facing nothing more than testifying, this is an outrage. The facts are RECORDED. Let process take its course, and let justice be served. The Police are subject to the law.

    Yeah right.
  12. Jim Delaney from Oshawa, Canada writes: This is outrageous. I have written to the RCMP complaints commission, to Stockwell Day, and to the Vancouver Airport Administration. I am uncomfortable with the idea that the police themselves are going to be doing the investigation. Their initial story did not match what could be clearly seen in the video; namely, that Mr Dziekanski offered no threat. As one external police observer commented, four policemen should be able to subdue an unarmed, non-threatening man without resorting to tasering. I am so disgusted I can hardly write. That poor man and his poor mother. And what a blotch on Canada's reputation as this is shown around the world. Heads must roll, and be seen to roll. Not suspension with pay or any of that rubbish. The people deemed responsible should be fired.
  13. J Man from Toronto, Canada writes: Tasering someone is a form of torture and should never be inflected on another human being in a free democracy country. As for gathering all the facts all the information is presented in the unedited video. No matter which way you slice it; an innocent human being was killed by Police because of their lack of human compassion.
  14. seeymore butts from Calgary, Canada writes: These 'cops' are nothing but thugs who are guilty of murder. But wait, maybe we should hear their side of it which I am sure is infinitely more believable than the unaltered hi-def video they didn't want to surrender. Do they teach you to kneel on the back of a person's neck after he's been cuffed and tazered? I feel so much better knowing that the RCMP will be investigating themselves here. Maybe the RCMP thinks they are above the law? If they aren't deporting people to be tortured then they are shooting unarmed prisoners in their cells. Time to do away with them.
  15. Mike Savo from Ontario, writes: Ross from Hamilton - You are entitled to your opinion just as I am to mine. I agree that we have to see what the courts find with all the evidence as they put it together. I appreciate police officers for the work they do. But even without knowing the FULL story to this, just watching that video clip, those RCMP officers acted as if this man wasn't even human. As if he was some kind of idiot. Why didn't they calmly talk to him and try and get someone who spoke Polish?! One of the first responses from the police officer was "Should I tazer him?" I'm wondering if some of these people are in their job for the right reason, to serve and protect and not to go trigger happy!
  16. Dave Goulden from Calgary, Canada writes: T Tichelar...unfortunately for the RCMP, the video speaks for itself, and in my opinion, it's damning evidence.
  17. D Mores from GTA, Canada writes: Matthew Ingram: your comment about being disturbed by the lack of action on the part of the citizen journalist is no different from how the early photojournalists were criticized for their work. One prominent wartime photojournalist said that it is hard to record history without resisting the temptation to pick up an AK-47 to help defend the innocent lives being killed, and of whom he was photographing.

    But by remaining an observer, these photojournalists recorded the atrocities of war, and brought those images to the rest of the world. They also performed a value service in their line of work, by inspiring peace and activist efforts.

    Similarly, citizen photojournalists are now doing the same thing. The world is more complex today. Sadly, wars are happening on our own turf, being perpetrated by people claiming to be police officers. It is the work of people like Paul Pritchard that helps society open its eyes to these events, and hopefully so that we can respond to them with justice and social progress.
  18. b Jones from Canada writes: I'm sure the police will be held responsible (ha ha ha ha). What a joke! Like everything else they do that the average person would be in jail for, they will surely get off without so much as a slap on the wrist. At most they will "Re-train" the officers in question. How many people have to die at the hands of incompetent idiots who's job is really to "Serve and Protect". Let's not forget about the Bush incident. The death penalty for opening a can of beer in a public place. Hear much about that incident lately???? It will just go away as time passes us by and we will even forget the key player's names. Much like the many other taser related deaths not to mention senior police figures being tried for raping their own retirement fund. Take my word for it - NOTHING will become of this except the life of the mother that will be forever changed. If the government started seriously looking into the RCMP, the RCMP in turn would seriously start looking into the government. Can you imagine what each might find? I'm sure Stockwell Day has nothing to hide.
  19. Jason Young from digital identityvile, Canada writes: Its an airport; the video clearly captures airport staff trying to find a russian interpreter, though they didn't recognize he was polish ( not fault on anyone there) ; the RCMP action's, having watched the full video seem disporportionate. Its an INTERNATIONAL Airport; try to call him down, the four officers formed a perimter, then the officer on the left deployed the taser. The man was also struck with a baton, and had a knee olaced on his neck. twice tasered, struck with a baton, oxygen supply cut off ( yes, choking is negligent behavior contributing to). You have situation control, wait for an intepretor, shouting commands at a agitate and likely disorintated man in language he doesn't under stand- not likely to be effective. The video indicates his central fixation was with keeping the doors open, hence the chairs and objects to keep the sensor dors open. I think its time to review the Use of force guidlines and situation managment plan with respect to these officers conduct. Charges, I'm not sure are warranted. But suspension and a fuller investigation ( Coroners or judical) seems certainly called for to adopt best practices at the least as well as answer the publics questions.
  20. Christopher Coady from St. Thomas, Canada writes: I would have thought that a Canadians first instinct would be to help out their fellow human being. After all is that not what Canadians have always been know for? It saddens me that our police officers have adopted the very American attitude of "shoot first and ask questions later". Its bad enough that our streets are becoming more dangerous with each passing year; now we have to worry about the actions of those sworn to protect us.
  21. Michael Borrelli from Canada writes: I love the comments from the people who think we need to wait for the whole story, or that nobody should jump to conclusions (like someone else said, based on a hi-def, unedited video of the incident). It's nice how easily they extend the courtesy of time and reflection to four alive and healthy thugs who couldn't extend the same courtesy to a man that any rational human being could see was in distress.
  22. Richard Fidler from Ottawa, Canada writes: And this is the police force instructing police in Haiti and Afghanistan? It's not hard to understand the police violence in Port-au-Prince's Cité Soleil slum.
  23. Robert Walker from Ottawa, Canada writes: In watching the video, I was struck by the fact that no-one (except for a single individual) intervened in any significant way prior to the arrival of the airport security and police.

    Even then, the woman on the video always maintained a safe distance and barrier between herself and Mr. Dziekanski.

    These two observations indicate to me that Mr. Dziekanski's actions (whatever his motivation) had most certainly escalated the situation to the point of instilling real fear in everyone present at the time.

    Bottom line is I have to wonder what most of the critics in this forum would have done if they were present in room; stand back, watch and judge the response of others, or put their money where their mouth is and resolve the problem in a different manner?
  24. J W from Canada writes: Normally I would tend to defend the police officers in similar situations, knowing how challenging their jobs are when they confront potentially violent people. However, after watching this video I was shocked that none of the officers attempted to restrain the man before tasering him. Although the man's behaviour was clearly erratic (weilding a stool and smashing a computer) I thought the officers had a good opportunity to restrain the man until and de escalate the situation. At least they should have tried.
  25. Adam Hrankowski from Canada writes: Lets think this one through. Without communicating anything instructive or comprehensible to this man, and relying upon hearsay from Airport security or staff, the RCMP decide to shoot him with 2 jolts of 50,000 volts of electricity. All this ten seconds after first approaching him. Four policemen facing an unarmed man in a secure area. This is unacceptable. This case should be immediately forwarded to the B.C. Crown Prosecutors office and Manslaughter charges laid against the officers responsible. Hopefully this weapon will be taken out of the hands of Police across Canada and a tragedy like this be the last.
  26. Frank Frink from writes: Rob Walker wrote:
    "These two observations indicate to me that Mr. Dziekanski's actions (whatever his motivation) had most certainly escalated the situation to the point of instilling real fear in everyone present at the time."

    Hmmm.. how so? I've seen both Mr. Pritchard, who shot the video footage, and Ms. Ashrafina, the woman in the video attempting to help Mr. Dziekanski, interviewed several times. They unequivically state that they did not fear Mr. Dziekanski, that he was not threatening anyone, and that they did not feel threatened at any time.

    I have yet to see any statement reported by anyone present during the incident that they felt 'fear'.

    If you know differently please share the source with us.
  27. Bernie Lodge from winnipeg, Canada writes: Wow. The immorality of that death is over the top for so many reasons!
  28. Blind InTheSun from Canada writes: Only in this day and age would the police dare to tell you that what you saw isn't what happened. Damning evidence, indeed. You don't need a whole lot training or savvy or education to understand human dignity and stress and torture. Are we so disconnected we don't even know what we see?
  29. Andrew Smith from Pickering Ontario, Canada writes: I would prefer to call it "citizen profiteering" rather then any sort of journalism. Not only does the videographer do nothing himself to alert anyone or assist in the matter, he then turns around and releases the video even after the mother requests that he not do so (let us not forget that the reason for the delay in the release was so that Mr. Pritchart's lawyer could consult with the mother).

    In my opinion this is nothing more than something trying to cash in on fame at the expense of someone else.
  30. Shawn rodie from Mississauga, Canada writes: To Ross Snowden: While I would agree with you that watching a video does not give all the facts, I would think that after watching the video and counting the number of Police Officers and Security Officers that took this man down that there was no just cause to Taser him with that many Enforcement Officers there. If that many Officers found themselves unable to tackle the man then they should hang up their uniforms as they are now causing more harm to the public then good. This video shows no attempt what so ever to restrain & Control or Contain the civilian. Just someone trying out their new Taser.
  31. Glib Stale from Ottawa, Canada writes: I can't believe most of the comments on this forum! The man was acting violently and erratically in an airport and refused attempts to calm him down. Had he done something violent to another passenger, people would have decried the lack of security. As far as I am concerned there was no 'police brutality'. It is regrettable that the man died, but there was clearly something very wrong with him.
  32. Shawn rodie from Mississauga, Canada writes: To Rober Walker: Hi Robert - I am an average guy who has worked in Bars for many years and have dealt with this exact type of situation many, many times. Just to answer your question - I would have tried to reason with him first or find someone that could speak with him in his own language, if no response, then I would attempt to joint lock the man and walk him out of the area. If he became violent for any reason, I would take him to the ground and sit on him until Police arrived. Based on what I saw on the video and no disrespect to the poor fellow, he did not look so tough that I would have felt the need to use a weapon on him. I am sure Police have their rules and regulations concerning the use of force to follow, but sometimes logic should prevail in these matters.
  33. Gustave Deslauriers from cranbrook, Canada writes: you would wonder whether or not the Vcr. airport security personel attempted to locate someone that could speak Polish. After spending all that time in that holding room one would have thought that the security personel would have attempted to help him out. I realize that the R.C.M.P. do encounter violent people, but being in that room after dis.embarking from a flight what possible deathly weapon could he have on him that 4 R.C.M.P. officers could not have subdued him without the taser, possibly lack of training or fear. Had it been only only 1 officer then I could agree with the taser being used. this incident certainly leaves or portraits a black mark on our country and the outcome of this investigation will certainly be watched by millions of people . My sympathy to his family.
  34. bylo selhi from Waterloo, Canada writes: > the video clearly captures airport staff trying to find a russian interpreter, though they didn't recognize he was polish ( not fault on anyone there)

    Really?

    Did anyone at YVR think to ask Mr Dziekanski for his passport (paszport in Polish, sounds very much like it does in English) or for his documents (documenty in Polish, sounds very much like it does in English)? If they had what he would have given them would have had "Polska" on the cover. And in case the security guard or RCMP officer still couldn't figure out what that meant, on the inside front cover there's even a nice pictogram that includes a map of Poland and shows that it's in Europe. The page opposite that has printed on it "Republic of Poland", "European Union" and "Passport" in all EU languages, including both of Canada's official languages.

    See for yourselves: http://www.abc.com.pl/serwis/gfx/318790105_0.gif
  35. AN N from Canada writes: Paul Pritchard: You Sir deserve to receive a citizen's award in recognition for the action that you captured with your video camera in capturing the unfolding tragedy at Vancouver Airport. Mr. Pritchard we have to Thank our lucky stars for citizens like you.

    I hope you get the recognition that you deserve.
  36. Robert Walker from Ottawa, Canada writes: I personally doubt the assertion that Mr. Pritchard and Ms. Ashrafina "did not fear Mr. Dziekanski" and "did not feel threatened at any time" as suggested by Frank Fink. I think it's clear from the video that neither party was willing to stand next to him without the presence of a barrier. If they were, and if "he was not threatening anyone" why didn't they stand beside him and resolve the situation before police were required? Perhaps Mr. Dziekanski could have been left in isolation to cool down (at the expense of some damaged airport equipment and significant disruption to the arrivals gate), and maybe we should think about the costs that can result when we are unable to accept disruption to our own hyperpaced schedules? Obviously these are questions that will have to be asked. My original point is that so often people will habitually divorce themselves from any personal responsability to get involved, while being all too willing to criticize those that do, and frankly "talk is cheap". Shawn, its too bad someone like you wasn't there, perhaps things might have turned out differently, and perhaps not. There is always risk in physical conflict, people have died due to head trauma after falling to the ground or being punched, both very possible during a physical confrontation. People have also died from pepper spray. So how do these risks stack up to the Taser?
  37. Anne Chilibeck from Haines Junction, Yukon, Canada writes: Instead of conducting inquiries into why RCMP tasered Robert Dziekanski to death, why not just charge the officers with murder and let them have their day in court? Or are police officers above the law in this country? Questions need to be raised about much more than the RCMP’s use of tasers. The behaviour of the officers seen in the Pritchard video reveals a police force that is drunk on its own power. And why not? This is the same RCMP that influenced the outcome of the last federal election. (Weeks before voters went to the polls in early 2006, the RCMP launched a criminal investigation implicating the Liberals in an income trust probe – an investigation called “bizarre” in a Globe&Mail editorial, and whose timing was labelled “unusual” by even former Tory cabinet minister Ron Atkey.) One can only imagine the relief being felt by today by the top brass at the RCMP that the Conservatives won the 2006 election and are currently in power as this taser scandal heats up. Questions also need to be asked about security at the Vancouver Airport. What is the money air line travelers are paying in "security" taxes being used for if new arrivals to the country are being left to wander in "secure" areas for 10 hours without assistance? And then killed by the most highly trained police force in the land?
  38. WILLY SIO from Brampton, ON, Canada writes: A number of posts seem to think Paul Pritchard may have done this for personal gain. Fact is, if there was no video footage, completely undedited, no one would be the wiser as to what actually happened. Why was his video seized - to destroy evidence ? I am almost sure Mrs. Dziekanski was concerned and maybe afraid that there would be severe repercussions to releasing the video. I think we are fortunate to have a photo journalists do an impromptu clip and had the guts to do what he did without fear the authorities would be breathing down his back for his action. The truth be told no matter how hard it is to believe it. If Pritchard had to take an active part in calming the man down, who would be left to video the incident ? Perhaps he is not trained to act in such situations which should be left to airport authorities to handle. But I guess their inaction led to the unfortunate incident. All his documentation would have shown he was a Polish person from Poland - what was so difficult about knowing how to communicate with him. Shoot first - ask questions later - if the person is still alive to do so ! AND let the RCMP do their own "internal" investigation ! They will find the best solution for everyone.
  39. C. M. from London, Canada writes: Don't comiserate. Let your MP 's know what you think. Here's a list of MPs you can email:

    http://tinyurl.com/zqd9g
  40. Bert Russell Paradox, BC from Canada writes:
    This video and a lot of the reaction show the power of the media - how one clip ( can cause a reaction in the public ) if the clip were shown to a jury and it probably will be - it will be in context - because there will be much more evidence given by witnesses which can alter perception of this clip. ( This in all fairness: flies in the face of proper Justice being done on with this tragedy) Trial by press (American style) has become fodder for GM and the likes of Global TV (CanWest) If you watched CBC National who provided additional detail before and after the incident last nite, then you begin to have more understanding of the circumstances and how it went downhill. Everyone watching the clip will experience real emotion (like watching a movie) and it by itself can jeopardize public opinion and justice. In my opinion our press has lost objective ethical journalist principle and use shock value to increase their revenue. We no longer have diversity, accountability, objectivety: which allowed them Freedom of the Press.
  41. Thyroid Support from Canada writes: Although from rural Alberta, I've made my way around cities and a few airports. But I also had to wait for a older child and it really makes one sick at heart, when there is a no show. Every hour makes you sicker and sicker, until after you have inquired as best you can with ones close at hand, you phone the police and ask about traffic accidents, or even foul play. I can feel for the tasered man's mother having to wait, and ask, and ask and ask with the sickness in my stomach making me feel like death. She, I don't believe, got to the point of asking the police like I did, but she was trauminized by Vancouver Airport personal who only thought of her as a complaining immigrant. Surely there should be enough money for a major airport to hire one person to be vigilant to foreign tourists, especially for those who do not speak the language. This man was not even a tourist or an experienced flyer. First blame I believe goes to Vancouver International Airport and all airport personal around the world who don't really care about the hardship of their clients.
  42. Robert Boyd from Windsor, Canada writes: The difference (apart fromt the murder of Mr. Dziekanski ), is no different from what police do, day in day out to those 'resisting arrest'.
    The stick in the kidneys , the flashlight on the side of the head.
    The charming tales told in court months later, after the notebooks have been erased and refined, seamlessly fit together when everyone agrees as to what hppened - the only difference is, that this time the heroes were caught on film by a decent man with a camera.
    But it matters naught.There will be a whitewash Coroners court followed by a leisurely trial (not following procedure most likely) then some community service served at the fire hall with the lads.Share a bowl of really good soup and tell war stories.
  43. A Mitchell from Canada writes: Where did this happen? China? Malaysia? Burma? No Canada. I am ashamed to be Canadian after watching this video. It’s clear that this man was no threat to police. Whats wrong with pepper spray? Too messy I guess. Now the RCMP has the blood of a guest to this country on their hands and as citizens of the Fascist Republic of Canada, we should be appalled. These ‘officers’ and I use that term very loosely should be charged with 1st degree MURDER. When they finish severing their 7 ½ year life sentence for first degree MURDER, they should be assigned community SERVICE where they can provide society the SERVICE they FAILED to PROVIDE US DURRING THIS INCIDENT. As a Canadian citizen, I urge you to phone and or write Steven Harper, Stockwell Day and your MP expressing your disgust. This is an election issue. We have known for years that the RCMP is as vicious as the KGB and other so called police force, but this further underscores the problems within the RCMP. MURDERS MURDERS MURDERS, RCMP GO TO HELL!!!!!!
  44. c rob from Canada writes: I fail to grasp how the RCMP can investigate itself, which if I understand matters correctly, they have the authority to do. What is wrong with that picture? Longer than there has been this profession called journalism there have been citizens who have, unwittingly or intentionally, hit upon a collective nerve among citizens through simple acts. We are in a video age. It makes me feel better in an odd way to know that the cameras can be trained on those who train them on us. Having said that, while I am sure that there will be spin upon spin coming from the RCMP on this matter, I can only speak as a simple woman who happens to be a mother when I say that what I forced (and forced it was) myself to view that footage, all I felt was pain. I don't give a rat's hind quarters whether or not this man was mentally stable or not. Completely irrelevant. I do care that a mother was looking for her son and going home as he was panicking and dying. Who among us, as parents, can ever dismiss or somehow justify this atrocity? He was foreign, he didn't speak English, so he gets two taser jolts. Is that it? Is that the Canada we believe in? Procedures were not followed correctly. The tape illustrates that. The RCMP can spin all it likes. Enough.
  45. c rob from Canada writes: I forgot to ask one simple question - is the RMP above the law? It's time folks to find the answer. Heaven help us if the answer is not what we expect.
  46. T Tichelar from Canada writes: How did this happen?! The video is self explanatory! Police are guilty! and shame on all of you who would like to play judge, jury and executioner because the evidence is surely all in! Is tazering safe? It certainly is being used as a first line as a "non-lethal" form of subduing agitated individuals. Based on first hand accounts of those that felt "safe" around the agitated individual, I saw no one who was willing to put there arm around him to console the poor man. Did police act appropriately? Did they follow established protocols? If so calling them guilty for doing their jobs seems awefully fascist. If not, then let's assign responsibility, not blame, and hold these people accountable.
  47. M L from Canada writes: Well, for other articles ( regarding this matter) the comments are closed. I wander why ???? Anyway, the latest one has a title "Day ordered taser review".. No Mr Day, tasers are fine, just the morons who have an athority to use them need reviev, and do it fast before another body bag is needed.

    And when you finish with this, do not forget to take care of few others who've worked very hard for taxpayers money try to cover up this event.

    Does the "tough on crime policy" ring a bell? The crime was commited, everybody can see it, so deal with it!!!!!
  48. David Brown from Canada writes: The Dziekanski matter illustrates that the RCMP have declined preciptiously in their policing skills. This is no longer a police force of which Canadians can be proud. They now seem to take their lessons from American reality TV shows.

    It is time for B.C. to completely review its relationship with the RCMP. We need better policing. One police force for the entire province.
  49. c rob from Canada writes: T Tichelar from Canada
    Wiht all due respect sir or madam, when the RCMP plays "judge, jury and executioner" of its own accord, is it not up to the citizenry in a free and "just" democracy to demand accountability? Using "established protocols" can, and has been, used as an excuse to use excessive and unwarranted force (to the point of death) all over this great big world of ours. To see it used here to advocate or even remotely justify an occurrence such as this sends shivers down my spine.
  50. chris Loughrey from Vancouver, Canada writes: The word "police" should be interchangable with the word "help"

    I saw no help here, just some cowboys running in with guns drawn, to come to the rescue of..... a mangled keyboard. My heart goes out to the family of this man.
  51. M L from Canada writes: chris Loughrey from Vancouver, Canada writes: The word "police" should be interchangable with the word "help"

    I saw no help here, just some cowboys running in with guns drawn, to come to the rescue of..... a mangled keyboard. My heart goes out to the family of this man.

    And this is an essence of this "story". Thank you for your common sense
  52. Paul McKay from Calgary, AB, Canada writes: It is unfortunate that we can not juxtapose video footage of Const. Douglas Scott being ruthlessly shot to death beside the video of the tasering of Mr. Dziekanski.

    I feel that today, in our quest to protect the legal rights of the individual here in Canada, we favour willingly sacrificing the lives of the very people we ask to protect us.

    I watched the video several times today and there where so many people that have some culpability and that could have remedied the situation sooner. Unfortunately, we sent the RCMP in to clean up the mess!!!
  53. M L from Canada writes: Paul McKay from Calgary, AB, Canada writes: It is unfortunate that we can not juxtapose video footage of Const. Douglas Scott being ruthlessly shot to death beside the video of the tasering of Mr. Dziekanski.

    I feel that today, in our quest to protect the legal rights of the individual here in Canada, we favour willingly sacrificing the lives of the very people we ask to protect us.

    I watched the video several times today and there where so many people that have some culpability and that could have remedied the situation sooner. Unfortunately, we sent the RCMP in to clean up the mess!!!

    ------------------------------------

    The murderer is murderer, regardles of what uniform he is wearing
  54. Alexandr Stelsovsky from Winnipeg, Canada writes: Public deserves to know. RCMP officers should protect our lives, not to kill us. Involved officers are criminally responsible. I watched in disgust jump kneeling on fallen dying man by our finest, in reality common criminals. In a way it is fault of our leaders, conservative political system which copies United States.
  55. T Tichelar from Canada writes: Yes C. Rob let's have accountability, let's have an independant inquiry in this democratic and free society. Let's not allow another tazer death to a hapless and potentially violent individual.... this is certainly not the first. Let's not justify or advocate that this is acceptable, but let's find out what happened and not assume that we have all the answers because we have a gruesome video. Perhaps the police should have helped in a different fashion than pulling tazers like cowbows in a B-movie. Perhaps they should have tried negotiation in some fashion. To evaluate protocols is not to justify that this death was ok, it most certainly is not ok, but to look at ways to prevent this from happening again. In general protocols are intended to protect people and establish acceptable standards of practice. When they cause harm, they need to be evaluated for compliance and possibly changed to prevent harm. Let's demand accountability. Let's examine the facts first. This story is bigger than police and a tazer death, it is a systems failure from start to finish.
  56. Paul McKay from Canada writes: If Mr. Dziekanski could not speak English, how did get through our customs and immigration area? The first question asked is “Can I see your passport”…in English.
  57. c rob from Halifax, Canada writes: T Tichelar from Canada
    Thank you for your post. Your comments give me pause for reflection. The interesting thing is that I think you and I are arriving at similare conclusions but from differing perspectives. You call it a systems failure. That's a logical approach. My "guts" tell me that there is something rotten, not in the state of Denmark, but right here at home. Different approaches, same end. No matter where we sit as Canadians, I believe that most of us will not easily shake off what we have seen (nor should we).
  58. Mark Shields from Calgary, Canada writes: Seeing something like this makes me concerned for my own personal safety. I am now even more frightened of the police than I was before. And to think that we teach kids that police officers are friendly and helpful, if I had a kid I would teach him or her to avoid contact with the police at all costs, they are unpredictable and dangerous. Also, lets not forget this city will supposedly be hosting millions of people who potentially don't speak english in two and a half years. If I was a tourist planning to attend the vancouver olympics and I knew I'd have to pass through that 'shoot first ask questions later' international arrivals area I'd be thinking twice.
  59. T Tichelar from Canada writes: Thanks C. Rob. I entered this debate with some trepidation as someone that deals with protocols on a regular basis. I have felt the publics wrath in situation in which after reflection and consultation with colleauges, protocol was followed. That is to say despite the wrath, acceptable standards were followed. This situation certainly gives room for pause and reflection as the outcome is tragic and heart-renderering. The facts are not all in and to judge the police for their behavior is to ask the question did the police act within established and accepted protocols? An inquiry needs to look at that and every other failure along the way that led to this tragic outcome. To assign accountability or blame to the final pathway, misses the other steps in the equation that could have prevented the whole aweful thing. I only hoped to add pause to the sentiment that we can act as judge, jury and executioner for the final stage of the drama and not allow process to look at how things should have gone. This saga is tragic from start to finish, there are more victims than Robert Dziekanski and his mother. You can bet the officers in this situation are victims of a different sort( whether or not they acted with in established protocols). As a result of these 4 officers action a man has died. This will weigh on their conscience regardless of whether or not they, their colleagues or the final inquiry determines that they acted within acceptable standards. How many other individuals in this story could have prevented the outcome? Security personnel? Airport Personnel? A caring bypasser early on? The system failed this man and his family. This is not to diffuse accountability, but to suggest that there were many individuals along the way that did not identify and act to an individual in distress! What does that say about us?! Let's fix the system, let's fix the protocols so that this does not happen again.
  60. Ian Robinson from Canada writes: A veryapposite piece by Boris Johnson (UK MP) appears in the current Weekly Telegraph (p. 21) concerning the killing of a harmless tourist, Jean de Menezes, by police in London in July 2005.
    His thesis is that the killing was due to police Health and Safety procedures stopping them exercising common sense and their undoubted personal courage to stop and question the suspect (already under surveillance due to wrong identification) before he had a chance to endanger the public.
    He finishes: " the dreadful truth is that it wasn't trigger-happiness that led to the death of Jean de Menezes. It was the modern obsession with health and safety that ratcheted up the risk to the public and fatally compromised the health and safety of an innocent man.
    Can the same apply to Our RCMP?
  61. Joachim Zucker from Toronto, ON, Canada writes: Although I agree the violence was unnecessary, the lack of good character and good religious, humanistic upbringing evident in the RCMP officers (as they behaved like thugs, Terminators, in the style of Arnold Schwartzenegger) too often these days, people are brought up as children, without any religious feeling, any humanistic expression and human bond with their fellow human beings. However, as in the modern, megacities and innercities of the USA, with 30 million people in a tiny space, such as NYC or similar, officers are trained and measured in terms of the effectiveness and efficiency of their intervention. Too often, the lowest common denominator remedy is applied ...and more and more this occurs. Powerless, weaklings, illiterate maggots are hired in the police, in the RCMP, in the government and so -on due to affirmative action programs, favoring the maggots, weaklings, physically inapt law officers, scared of a mouse running across the floor ... much less a grown man who is confused and frustrated from Poland. I would blame 1/3 modern society, as educating people as heartless robots, 1/3 the laws of this land for hiring maggots and illiterate morons as public servants and officers, and 1/3 the jumping to conclusions by the officers of using disproportionate force in this situation ( negligence, manslaughter.)
  62. otto von abbatoir from Los Angeles, United States writes: Now you know how a black man gets treated every time he tries to cross from Detroit into Windsor.
  63. John Keller from Calgary, Canada writes: I really got frustrated upon reading the article in the newspaper in which an RCMP spokesperson states " This is only a video, we have many different witnesses and our officers wil testify under oath as to what happened"

    Does this mean that if someone is on police video comiting a crime or breaking a law, then this is only a video and they can swear under oath that this is not what actually happened ????????

    Of course not, because the police is always right and they seem to be above the law lately.
  64. Andrew Smith from Pickering Ont, Canada writes: I am the only one who sees the irony here?

    We have dozens of people willing to jump into a situation they know nothing about, quickly pass judgement and then start swinging - which is EXACTLY what they are criticizing the RCMP for doing!

    Obviously the RCMP did not expect that the person would die, there is no evidence that the taser is what killed the guy, and an investigation was ordered BEFORE anyone knew of or saw the video.

    Give the system a chance to work.
  65. Chris Anthony from Regina, Canada writes: Without a doubt the situation at Vancouver airport raises lots of questions and causes one to question what happened. From all appearances the video suggests poor judgement on the part of the officers involved in how the situation was handled. Based on what is seen in the video one would have to say it was not handled very well.

    What is missing is what was going on in the minds of the officers at the time, which we won't know until the various inquiries and inquests are completed. Having gone on a number of police ride alongs, I can assure you that in volatile situations such as this there are lots of emotions going on in the officers, whether there is one or four at a scene.

    Police officers are human and they do experience fear in volatile situations. They have to be concerned about public safety as well as officer safety. But if they do not pay sufficient attention to officer safety and get maimed in a situation, then very clearly public safety is at risk if they are down. They need to act quickly to diffuse potential violent situations with the least amount of force.

    Did they use to much force in this situation.....possibly, but once again what was their state of mind. What were they told before arriving at this situation by whoever called them? Were they told there was a situation that was getting out of hand and they needed to subdue the situation before it got out of hand? Once again the inquiry and inquests will hopefully answer these questions.

    Do police make mistakes...of course they do. Are innocent people sometimes inappropriately mistreated....of course. Are there police officers in police forces who should not be police officers....of course there are. We do not live in a perfect world, but I would venture to guess that police forces try to get the best men and women and try to weed out the bad ones. Were the officers in this situation bad officers or did they just use bad judgement.

    To be continued.
  66. Chris Anthony from Regina, Canada writes: Part 2...So the next time you call the police to help when you are having a problem..or the next time you pass judgement on the police....think not only of the Vancouver incident but also of these incidents:

    January 1987:
    Special Const. Gordon Kowalczyk, 35, answers a call from a gas station near the Calgary Airport, saying a customer had left without paying for gas. He stopped a suspect, who shot him at point-blank range from his truck before stepping out of the vehicle and firing five more shots at the dying policeman.

    March 2001:
    RCMP Const. Jurgen Seewald, 47, was shot and killed while responding to a domestic dispute in Cape Dorset, Nunavut. The 26-year veteran of the force had only moved to the northern community a few months earlier. The man who was convicted of first-degree murder in the case has appealed, with his lawyer arguing he was acting in self-defence after being pepper-sprayed.

    December 2001:
    Const. Dennis Strongquill, 52, and his partner stop a truck near Russell, Man., intending to cite the driver for failing to dim his high beams. A passenger gets out of the truck and starts shooting. The two officers jump back in their RCMP SUV and start driving toward a nearby RCMP detachment. In the parking lot, the pursuing truck smashes the police SUV into a fence, trapping Strongquill inside. Again, a passenger gets out and fires a shotgun at Strongquill, fatally wounding him before fleeing the scene.

    Feb. 28, 2004 RCMP Cpl. Jim Galloway, 53, a dog handler based in Edmonton, was shot and killed during a six-hour standoff in Spruce Grove, a bedroom community just outside the Alberta capital. A 31-year veteran of the force, Galloway was shot dead at the scene as a gunman tried to leave a house while exchanging gunfire with police. The 39-year-old suspect was also hit and died later in hospital.

    To be continued....
  67. Bert Russell Paradox, BC from Canada writes:
    The first post appears to be that of the Editor - perhaps journalist - who appears to be explaining "Raw Journalism" and its value. But to compare this to the Kennedy or Oswald assassinations is completely off the mark. The Taser incident I saw was basically the same that is repeated time after time by media for shock value. Sure one can second guess and say why didn't they do this or that but my take on this is that it is a common practise when dealing with violence, to protect the officers and the individual from harming anyone by not allowing the individual to continue his/her violent path. The results of a taser I understand is demonstrated on the Police themselves in training - and there certainly is no intention to kill them or anyone else. It has been suggested that in a paranoid rage? that in itself can lead to sudden death, but what I have been able to establish thru google - there has been no case where it has proven the taser killed. The use of this devise around the world has been found to be the most effective way to immobalize by the police to cause the least harm. Now if anyone who saw this video wants to go to court and give evidence that he was killed by the jolt of the taser (be prepared to have your credibility seriously questioned). From my life experience it appears that when all else fails - when the crap hits the fan you call the police (any police) There are numerous cases in the media where mental patients have been tasered for their own safety and there are cases where people have died afterwards. I can recall where the media has interviewed relatives who have responded in grief of their loved one and the impact of that on TV always puts police in a bad light. The finding of a Coroner inquest then becomes a conspiracy. It sells a lot of papers but justice ends up being the victim. Do police forces need separate reviews? Absolutely.
  68. Chris Anthony from Regina, Canada writes: Part 3

    March 2005:
    Four RCMP officers are ambushed and shot to death on a farm near Rochfort Bridge, Alta. They were investigating reports of stolen auto parts as well as a small marijuana grow operation. The gunman is also found dead inside a Quonset hut - a large metal storage shed.

    July 2006:
    Two RCMP officers, Const. Robin Cameron, 29, and Const. Marc Bourdages, 26, are shot July 7 after a car pursuit of a domestic violence suspect ended near Mildred, Sask. The officers would die nine days later. After an extensive hunt for Curtis Dagenais, the prime suspect in the shootings, he turns himself in on July 18.

    October 2007:
    Const. Christopher Worden was shot in Hay River, N.W.T., a small town about 500 kilometres south of Yellowknife. The 30-year-old officer was responding to a call from a house for assistance at 5 a.m. on Oct. 6 when he lost radio contact with police. Two backup officers were sent to the scene and found Const. Worden in a wooded area suffering from gunshot wounds. He died in hospital.

    Police launched a Canada-wide search for Emrah Bulatci, who surrendered to police following a standoff in Edmonton five days later. He has been charged with first-degree murder.

    November 2007:
    Const. Douglas Scott, 20, was shot and killed on Nov. 5 in the Baffin Island hamlet of Kimmirut, about 120 kilometres south of Iqaluit. Scott, from Brockville, Ont., was responding to a complaint of an impaired driver late in the evening.

    WE NEED TO RIGHTLY QUESTION THE ACTIONS TAKEN, BUT DO NOT JUDGE THE ENTIRE FORCE BASED ON THIS ONE INCIDENT IN VANCOUVER. WHAT HAPPENED IS VERY TRAGIC AND MY HEART GOES OUT TO HIS MOTHER. BUT I WOULD BE PREPARED TO SAY THAT THE MOST POLICE OFFICERS WOULD FEEL THE SAME WAY ABOUT THIS SITUATION.
  69. Joshua Chan from Canada writes: This is so sad. This entire incident smells of a cover up. The police have obviously exaggerated the threat this man posed to the public in their initial press releases. They have delayed the release of the video hoping the controversy would die down a bit. And now we're being told the coroner's investigation into the man's death could take up to 6 months if not longer.

    My family was a victim of a police error that resulted in the death of my brother. I was trusting of the RCMP then but found out the hard way that they were interested in only one thing - clearing themselves of any blame.

    Unfortunately for this man's family, it seems that the RCMP have not changed in the way they deal with incidents where they are at fault. I hope their family fares better than mine did...
  70. Geoff Wilson from Revelstoke, Canada writes: Congratulations RCMP: on this day you have made me ashamed to be a Canadian.
  71. True North from Canada writes: Chris Anthony from Regina, Canada: The difference between your voluminous examples and this specific police murder is that the deceased in this case was in a secure area, having passed through security to even get on the plane in the first place, and so he could not possibly be carrying a firearm, deadly weapon or even a nail clipper.

    You examples. while numerous, bear no similarity to this murder whatsoever.
  72. Chris Anthony from Regina, Canada writes: True North....you obviously didn't read my comments thoroughly. There were 3 parts to my comments. Did you read them all or just the one?

    I said it was tragic...I said it needed to be questioned and I said it probably was poor judgement. But I also said you needed to be aware of what was going on in the minds of the officers, you needed to be aware of what they were told before they got there and I said a lot of other things you obviously chose not to read.

    The examples were there to show the dangers police put themselves in and were identified for those who were castigating the entire force as a result of this tragic and most unfortunate incident.

    The situation was not good, it was tragic and there will likely be consequences, and hopefully in the end, future changes for the better.....but I do not think it was murder.

    It helps if you have an open mind on here and read the comments in their entirety and not just pick out the pieces that fit your mind set.

    Would you rather have the police forces in Pakistan, Russia, China, Iran and Burma operating in Canada. There are rarely inquests or inquiries in those countries....just actions.
  73. PJ C from Victoria, Canada writes: Add up the "airport paranoia" since 9/11 with the procedural "I don't want to lay my hands on the bad guy" Taser first, ask questions later mentality and you have an avoidable death.
  74. joe concerned from Oakville, Canada writes: Reckless Conduct Mister Policeman (RCMP) Certainly, a properly trained Royal Canadian Mounted Policeman should expect and be prepared to encounter language barriers at an international airport. Perhaps these officers should join the military and fight the real terrosits in Iraq/Afganistan if they are looking for combat action. This conduct is certain to lower Canada's image on the world stage...what a way for Canada to receive a black eye. This conduct is not endorsed by our Country's general population...WE never have and never will, endorse this sort of savage behaviour...I hope that all future visitors will take some comfort in that sentiment. it is difficult to accept this conduct just as it was difficult for the Americans to stand behind Michael Vick with his recent savage treatment of dogs....the difference, of course, is that we have a police force that executed an innocent man! How many years did Michael Vick get for his savage treatment of dogs?...What is the appropriate punishment for the public execution of an innocent human being? At least Michael Vick admitted to his wrongdoings and accepted his fate.. I wonder if these individuals will do the same...or will they make it worse for the victim's mother and our Country by trying to justify their savage behaviour? The last chance for damage control is coming up. Punish the wrongdoers (after a fair trial, of course) and clean up the gang violence, especially if they happen to wear a uniform, kevlar vest and are licensed to carry a taser, a loaded gun and a baton. 30 million viewers can't be wrong. Over to you Mr. Harper. Agitated in Oakville, Joe Canada (I AM CANADIAN, albeit, extremely ashamed for our Country at this time.)
  75. Paul Thibodeau from Calgary, Canada writes: What made my stomach turn was the cold and calculating way the officers distanced themselves from Mr. Dziekanski as he stood there so harmlessly and helplessly. The officers could have easily both physically restrained and handcuffed Mr. Dziekanski upon their arrival on the scene. When he moved away from them they surrounded him at a distance and shot him as he stood there confused. The problem here was the utter lack of humanity, and how many obvious avenues of effective and humane treatment were bypassed in favor of a straight path to unjustified force. It is a sad and frightening fact how inhumanity can be justified in a police uniform. What was done was wrong, and obviously wrong, and no amount of clever rhetoric can be allowed to cover this wrong.
  76. John Meech from Delta, Canada writes: As a 6-generation Canadian, I am absolutely appalled by how this man was treated at YVR. I have passed through the same area on numerous occasions and have always felt that the passage ways at the YVR International arrivals area are very disorienting and not well-laid out. There are few people to help out a new arrival who needs to find transport to the city. Where are the bus stops - where are the taxi stands? There is no one on the inside to help. His agitation was clear in the video - he wanted to keep the doors open - at the start of the video, you can see his breathing is very heavy and he is in total distress - he appeared to welcome the arrival of the police and called out to them - when they approached him he seemed to understand that they wanted him to move back - he put his hands up in submission. What did they do - "tasered" him - sat on him (three of them) - choked him with their knees - hit him with a baton (three times) - tasered him again (you can hear him scream out in agony one last time) - quite simply, they killed him and did not try to revive him - the plain-clothed cop feels for a pulse. When he got nothing, why not start CPR immediately?. Are RCMP officers not trained in CPR?

    Why have the names of the killers not been released? If they were not police officers, their names would be known by now.

    Let's blow-up their faces in the video and try to find their identities in police documents.

    Where were the YVR folks to help out a terrified person in a strange land? Where were the Canadian immigration and customs officials?

    YVR and the RCMP and the Customs and Immigration folks have all given Canada a real black-eye with this terrible tragedy. People in all these agencies must be brought to account so this can never happen again.

    Fear will be with me now whenever I pass through YVR that my reaction (anger or frustration) might be misinterpreted by a taser-trigger-happy police officer.
  77. Luc Poudrier from Montreal, Canada writes: Guilty of being different! The only crime of Mr. Dziekanski will have been, like the young Jean Charles de Menezes in the London Tube in 2005, of being different, of being "the other one". Had he speak english, albeit even a bad english, he might be alive today. What was missing is not a better protocol for the use of taser, or better police training or even a translator but what was tragically missing is COMPASSION. The realisation that the life of the man in front of me, however different he might be, is sacred and that his distress did not warrant my antagonism toward him but should have called for my desire to try to understand him. There is a Buddhist saying, "At first I saw a beast from afar, has I got closer I realize it was a man and when we finally met I realize we were brothers!" P.S. If you look carefully at the video, you will notice that there is an airport security camera near the ceiling at the top of the counter behind Mr. Dziekanski (quite obvious when he lift the computer over his head). Was this camera recording? What did it show? I really hope some journalist will pick-up on this detail and find out more information.
  78. diane gordon from London, United Kingdom writes: This is a very sad story, indeed. Watching the video is not only disturbing because of the situation's final outcome, but also a commentary on the state of 'security' supposedly on higher alert at our airports.
    Mr. Dziekanski was causing no harm to anyone and apart from acting in a somewhat fidgety manner was neither abusive or violent. What's clear is that all of the people called to assist in the situation had no idea what to do. The fact that the video is 'out there' will hopefully result in something more positive, like perhaps wake up airport authorities on what actually happens in an 'emergency situation.' However, what I most take issue with is putting Paul Pritchard on a pedestal - he happened to be at the 'right place and right time' and I hardly doubt that pure civic duty is what he had at the top of his mind let alone citizen journalism; otherwise, he would have left the tape rolling and actually run to get help. The fact that the media is now painting him as some sort of hero is pathetic and only further substantiates how sensation sells. What happened h