Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

$100 oil fades fast

The prospect of $100 a barrel oil is evaporating as fast as it was conjured.

The commodity, which nine days ago was less than a dollar away from $100, is on Friday at less than $90, tumbling on the reality that oil supplies are adequate and that Saudi Arabia will likely fight for an OPEC production increase at a meeting next week to push the price lower so sagging demand for the product might rebound.

"Last week, we had suggested that the party for crude oil may be slowly drawing to a close," analyst Marty King of FirstEnergy Capital in Calgary said in a report on Thursday. "Given the downward pricing pressure seen this week, it would seem that the guests continue to file out the door and the lights are being dimmed. Indeed, the lights may grow dimmer in the next few weeks."

If you've got money in oil, Mr. King's immediate advice is clear: "Profit take, for now." On the "for now" bit, Mr. King means he sees oil remaining fairly high over 2008, predicting an average of $72 a barrel, which is higher than many forecasters, but he feels he might be lowballing it, talking about "real additional upside."

Canadian names like Suncor Energy Inc., the oil sands miner, and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., the No. 2 domestic producer and a new oil sands miner, would benefit from a crude price that remains higher than $70 for a long time.

As for demand, economists have spoken relatively blithely about the global economy's resilience to high oil prices. Yes, we have not tumbled into recession. But: Demand is ebbing, even in the U.S., those 50 states that seemingly can never suck down enough black gold to fuel their mobility wants.

The numbers, in fact, are very striking. Let us recall that oil first surged past $70 in April, 2006 (remember this date) and despite a dip towards $50 early this year, the commodity has averaged roughly $70 in 2007. That's not cheap.

U.S. oil demand, for crude and refined products, was 20.39-million barrels a day in September, according to the U.S. Energy Information Agency. That is down 3.1 per cent from August and is in fact the lowest since April, 2006, one-and-one-half years ago and the same month that oil first surpassed $70.

Some people talk about Peak Oil. What about Peak Demand? When did U.S. demand peak? Not April, 2006, but August, 2005, more than two years ago, at 21.67-million barrels a day. (This said, demand of course could rise in future.)

Further context: When was the first time U.S. demand was at the same level as this September?

December, 1999. Eight years ago.

The U.S. uses a lot of oil. It torches one of every four barrels produced in the world daily. But it’s not using more.

For Saudi Arabia, the world’s No. 1 supplier, whose desert economy doesn’t exist without oil, this is pressing and worrisome. Yes, there is China, and yes, there is India. But when we hear about “security of supply” from President George W. Bush, Saudi Arabia talks about “security of demand,” specifically making that a main theme of its OPEC Summit in Riyadh earlier this month, which was essentially one big global public relations campaign to say: We’re nice, reliable and will supply reasonably priced oil (not at $100 a barrel).

Ali al-Naimi, Saudi’s oil minister and de facto OPEC chief, went so far as to say Saudi and OPEC have nothing to do with $100 oil and are equally bewildered by it. That was somewhat disingenuous but telling, too, in that Saudi clearly fears $100 oil and its corrosive impact on demand.

Next week, on Dec. 5, OPEC oil ministers meet in Abu Dhabi for a regular meeting at which the cartel’s production will be discussed. A year ago, with prices sliding, Saudi and the rest yanked about 1 million barrels a day off the market, priming the pump this year for near $100 oil.

Earlier this fall, OPEC said it would restore 500,000 barrels a day and on Dec. 5 the expectation is that Saudi and its allies in OPEC will outvote Venezuela and Iran and add more production to quell the oil price -which clearly, without doubt, is hurting demand for the product.

As for $100 oil, when will we see it? It doesn’t look like this year—and maybe not for a long while. But, of course, perhaps tomorrow—the wild world of oil rolls ahead.

  1. Rod Campbell-Ross from Sydney, Australia writes: This article is written on the basis that production can be increased ant any time. It ignores several major trends, all in the wrong direction: 1. Exponential consumption growth in exporting countries. On current trends, even Saudi arabia will have no more oil to export in 20 years. England went from Peak Oil and a decent sized oil exporter to being an oil importer in 6 short years. The same is set to happen in all the other oil exporting countries one by one. Saudi, Russia and Norway, the three biggest exporters exported 500,000 barrels per day less in 2006 on avaerage than they did in 2005. Note that is an accelerating trend and the exports could decline much further this year. 2. Accelerating field decline. The North Sea is declining at 10% per year. Assuming average decline is only 4%, that is still 3m barrels per day every year just to maintain production. In 3 years it is the equivalent of a whole new Saudi Arabia. How many new Saudi Arabia are there? 3. Ageing infrastructure and workforce. This is a major problem that is exerting enormous pressure on the ability of the oil industry even to maintain production. 4. Oil is becoming more valuable to keep in the ground. Why pump it out today and sell it for $90 when you can sell it in a years time for $150? I know you Canadians love your tar sands (sorry, "oil" sands). The fact is that it is tar. It needs huge amounts of natural gas and water to process and these are two issues that are bearing down on the industry very heavily. I doubt the industry will ever produce 3m barrels per day. That is why oil is $90 today and could be anywhere between $50 and $200 sometime between now and Christmas 2008.
  2. Robert Bott from Calgary, Canada writes: Actually the figures cited indicate that demand is amazingly robust. For a long time the generally accepted elasticity of oil demand has been -0.1 short-term and somewhat greater over the long term. That means a 100 per cent increase in oil prices since 2004 should have produced a 10 per cent decrease in demand. That may have been true in the past, at least for mature economies. According to your figures, U.S. demand is down a bit (7.5 per cent?) although I just checked the EIA figures and consumption appears to be almost unchanged since 2004 despite a doubling of crude oil prices. World demand has continued to increase over this period. Unlike earlier periods, when elasticity benchmarks were established, this time there may be less "low hanging fruit" from efficiency gains and off-oil substitution.

    I think the author is cherry-picking monthly figures to make a point of limited short-term validity. He is also accepting Saudi claims about their ability to increase production -- a big bet supported by a paucity of data. On the supply side, the best hope is a breakthrough in bio engineering or nanotech that opens access to the 70 per cent of oil left underground by current production methods. Lacking that, I think Mr. Campbell-Ross's (comment above) makes some good points.

    As an aside, note that much of the recent increase in global "crude oil" supplies has actually been natural gas liquids (ethane, propane, butane, and pentanes-plus condensates). This is should be a warning signal; it means a lot of oil fields have reached the end of their productive life, and they are now blowing off the "wet" gas caps.
  3. Stephen Penney from St. John's, Canada writes: I wouldn't doubt that election and referendum results in Russia and Venezuela today could put the cost of oil up to a $100/barrel before Christmas. What was Hugo Chavez talking about yesterday - stopping oil exports to North America should there be any international complaints about the referendum's results? I'd say that even the threat alone would put up the cost of oil again to close to a $100 or more.
  4. clifford wirth from Manchester, New Hampshire, United States writes: The price of oil has been going up, and will continue to do so. In the long run it matters little that the price drops back temporarily but then forges ahead to $125 later in 2008. As soon as global oil production begins to decline in 2008, or soon after, the price of oil will increase far more rapidly than in the past. This reality is covered in the following report: http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html
  5. Neal Zavitz from Edmontonian in Victoria, Canada writes: Rubbish Article. Peak demand? That would essentially mean the global economy decided to contract and not expand. Expansion requires additional energy supply to make it possible. And pretty much everyone knows the global economy is planned and designed around constant expansion. Any sign of contraction and the games over.
  6. David Ebner from Calgary, Canada writes: Regarding the last comment, I note that the U.S. economy is growing despite its petroleum demand remaining roughly flat this entire decade.
  7. brian smith from Canada writes: Stephen Penney from St Johns made an amusingly proposterous statement about Venezeula and Chavez's threats. So he threatens to cutoff oil exports to the US? Do you realize that the southern US refineries are some of the only refineries around able to accept the heavy low grade crude that Venezeula pumps from the orinoco? Who else will Hugo send his dirty crude to? his cuban freinds? LOL. If Hugo stops selling crude to America he loses a huge amount of his countries export income. How will he support his socialist aspirations without that oil income? His regime will fall faster then it rose.. much faster. He knows it. There would be no way to support his highly expensive gov. reforms and nationaliztions without $70 oil revenue ..
    David, i agree with your statement and it is possible to see consumption remain flat or to fall ; albeit at a slow rate in the US as fuel economy standards rise in vehicles and efficiency rises in many other areas incl. home heating
  8. brian smith from Canada writes: note , threw $70 out there as a rough avg for 07.. lord only knows for 08

Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to Inside Energy

Back to top