Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

From watchdogs to lapdogs?

Following up on Kady O'Malley's intrepid committee-watching, the Star offers this alarming look at what the Tories may have in mind for officers of Parliament.

It's hard to believe that even this government is so control freakish that it would attempt to control every word that comes out of the mouth of independent watchdogs. So it's entirely possible - as Sheila Fraser acknowledges - that all we're talking about here is a poorly drafted document that doesn't set out clear guidelines of who is and isn't subject to PCO scrutiny of communications documents, as opposed to a deliberate targeting of the auditor-general, the information commissioner, the ethics commissioner, et al.

Regardless of whether it's part of some grand conspiracy, though, what is allegedly in that document isn't just troubling - it's insane. If it became official policy, and proved enforceable, it would be one step short of doing away with the watchdogs altogether - which would be a pretty remarkable achievement for a party elected on the promise of more accountable government.

Of course, we don't know if that's what's in the document, because only a few people have actually seen the thing. It being merely a draft, as opposed to the final policy, the government has been under no obligation to make it public. But now that the A-G has let the cat out of the bag, the Tories might do themselves a favour by clearing this up as quickly as possible.

  1. J K GALBRAITH from Canada writes: Silly, silly, silly. Why would they even attempt to do this. First of all the all those officers are officers of Parliament not of the government. Secondly, I doubt any court would uphold the government's right to vet communications as the legislation that established those positions talks about their independece. Thirdly, in order to enforce such a directive, they would need to change the legislation which would never pass in a minority government situation. Who would want to waste their limited political capital fighting a battle that will receive unanimous opposition and condemnation from all opposition parties, the officers and themselves and 95% of media outlets? I presume this will die a natural death before it would become actual policy.
  2. Dave Roberts from Toronto, Canada writes: In other news the Q1/08 political party donations are out:

    CPC: $4,954,817.22
    LPC: $879,926.75
    NDP: $1,119,647.67
    BQ: $37,071.31
  3. Ruth Walker from Edmonton, Canada writes: Adam, I don't know why you would find this so hard to believe. The Harperites do have a plan, and you won't recognize Canada when they are done. The PM even said so.

    Information control is an integral part of the Alberta government practices. Here we have a Public Affairs Bureau which performs similar vetting services. Just because Stalin and Hitler did exactly the same thing, is that any reason for alarm???

    Harper just being a good Albertan. We pioneered the end of democracy. The rest of the country had better either get used to it, or stop voting for chimpanzees.
  4. Trillian Rand from Canada writes: Of equal importance, if this is correct, will any of the opposition parties speak out, or will they sit on their hands while the present government methodically cripples any and all organizations that have even the slightest possibility of interfering with 'the will of parliament'?

    We are seeing an assault on the safeguards that limit the abilities of elected officials to act in any way they like. So far the opposition Liberals have been noticeably silent. The only conclusion is perhaps the most obvious: expecting to sit on the other side of the house one day, why should they object to what will eventually be a benefit to themselves?

    This dismantling of the checks and balances of our system should be unacceptable to everyone. That it is not only shows how little understanding most people have of the importance of these restrictions to ministerial actions. Elected officials should not be above the law. They should not have absolute powers.

    Extremist partisanship has led to a suspension of reason. It has caused many to look beneath the excuses for government actions and to ignore their substance. While it is one thing to cheer for your favourite political party, it is another to allow it to dismantle the safeguards that ensure the freedoms we enjoy.

    Thomas Jefferson told us that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. It is a warning we should heed.
  5. R. Carriere from Maritimes, Canada writes: Good God! Here we go again--trying to 'MAKE' news that does not exist. So now my questions: 1) Where is the supposed 'Draft Document?' 2) What exactlly does it say? 3) Who wrote the 'Draft Document?' 4) Who has read it? 5) Has it become policy or law? So the Toronto Star speculates and Adam jumps all over it. I am still surprised the printing of the Star still uses 'blue' ink! So here we go. All kinds of comments based on a document no one has seen or read but because the A/G makes some kind of backhand remark, it all becomes gospel of truth. If anyone has any common sense, they would know that if Harper ever made this very undemocratic, his numbers would be at about 5% and he would get the boot in a heartbeat! Bad one, Adam-based on specuation and heresay at best. Next time bring some facts with you so we can properly debate. And oh, by the way, this was in the same article: 'I can assure you that we respect the independence of the officers of Parliament and this government would not do anything inconsistent with the independent role of those officers,' Treasury Board President Vic Toews told the Commons yesterday. .
  6. dump harper he's threatening the tax free status of fraserinstitute and churches from Canada writes: 5:23 Ignorance is beauuuu Tee ful in its own way . silly people can just go on and play .
  7. Liberals Face Criminal Charges from Canada writes: This story has been debunked and is completely untrue. However the MSM love it and can't let go. Good Tory bashing while it lasts. Kady O and the Red Star are shills for the Liberal Party.
  8. dump harper he's threatening the tax free status of fraserinstitute and churches from Canada writes: Liberals Face Criminal Charges from Canada writes:

    Are arms lenght watchdogs subject to civil servants policy of reporting to PCO before talking outside government ?

    If an arms lenght watchdog buys a pencil sharpener to audit people must the PCO sign off on the purchase now ?

    I howled when I heard Shella whacked his little P@@ P@@ .
  9. dump harper he's threatening the tax free status of fraserinstitute and churches from Canada writes: R. Carriere from Maritimes, Canada writes: Good God! gospel of truth. If anyone has any common sense, they would know that ...
    Posted 01/05/08 at 5:23 PM EDT

    Rick McNutty : Please don't try and multi task . Relax big fella , deep breath . Now which role are you trying to fill with this holier than thou post ? .... Yes Man ..... Mouth piece ......... Bobble head ..... ?
  10. Open Mike from Canada writes: "If it became official policy, and proved enforceable, it would be one step short of doing away with the watchdogs altogether - which would be a pretty remarkable achievement for a party elected on the promise of more accountable government."

    It's already happened in BC: the government of Gordon Campbell has removed so much of its workings from public view---there's so little oversight and so much secrecy here now---that the people of BC have less idea of what these guys are doing behind their backs (and judging from the expensive faits accompli they keep handing us there's much worse to come) than Zimbabweans have of the machinations of Mugabe and his crowd. These right-wing business-serving governments have shown that they simply cannot be trusted to be honest whether at the provincial or federal levels. When they're in power we desperately need watchdogs and oversight just to protect ourselves from their predatory schemes. What a choice: corrupt incompetence from the right, or idealistic incompetence from the left. Wonderful.

Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to Adam Radwanski

Back to top