I'm back. Let's work.
Toronto FC and Product Plug New York played a tense, messy bit of largely forgettable soccer in the howling wind and cold, soaking damp of BMO Field last night. It ended in a 1-1 drain-off, with both sides perhaps lucky to score, and little serious chance that the tally was ever going to be higher.
The best news for the Torontos? The back four, which keeps improving but didn't really have much choice after that horrendous early outing in D.C., held the dangerous New York attacking duo of Juan Pablo Angel and Jozy Altidore without a shot on goal all night. The Reds showed good, consistent graft in-close, and got a point from a game earlier incarnations of this team could very, very easily have lost.
The concern, alas, was up front.
Fan and franchise favourite Danny Dichio struggled badly last night. The New Yorkers switched from a three-man defensive unit to a four, and marked Dichio out of the match – a bit too easily, many observers thought. Their two central defenders set up three to five yards either side of Toronto's isolated forward threat, and Dichio was unable to dislodge them. He looked both deliberate and tentative on the few through balls that found him – not a promising combo in admittedly difficult weather.
Toronto coach John Carver – whose smiling post-game bluntness is winning admirers among the so-called experts, myself included – declined to single his striker out for criticism. But when all his praise went to his goaltender, defenders and midfield, the flip side of the coin was up there spinning for anyone who cared to call it.
So I did. Asked directly, Carver felt Dichio should have moved in close to one of his defenders, giving him one man he could turn, leaving the other fullback off on his own. But he also rose mildly to Dichio's defence, saying he was out there to knock down high balls from the midfield, which never came. Also, there weren't enough dangerous forward runs that could have pried the advertising-clad New York defenders off the lonely striker's back.
The point here is not to rip Danny Dichio. But concern – certainly – has raised its head.
Some nights, lone strikers have to do all the work themselves. With the rest of the Torontos largely gobbled up on containment duty, it fell to Dichio to find ways to get open. On this night, he didn't.
The speedier and smaller Jeff Cunningham got a late look, subbing in for Dichio on 83 minutes. He didn't have any luck slipping the chronic double coverage either.
But after tonight, I suspect he'll get a start or two so Carver can do some comparison shopping, seeing how his new midfield flies with an entirely different kind of target man.
Personally, I'm still hoping we get some chances to see Dichio and Cunningham working together, because they have an instinctive passing by-play that creates chances and is a lot of fun to watch. But with the multi-faceted dangerousness of Amado Guevara prowling the netherland between midfield and attack, there really isn't room for the both of them anymore.
I'm certainly not going to chase a man out of town for having an off-night. But just at the moment, the Red Rocket that is TFC is working a lot harder than its nosecone. And that will kill you dead in the playoffs – if you manage to get there.
Onward!
- Post a comment
- Skip to the latest comment
- Back to the blog
-
Joe Serge from Canada writes: I agree. I think TFC has really shored up the midfield well and is top class there. Our problem is up front. If you look at the goals they've scored, more than half have come directly off or indirectly off a free-kick.
Dichio, love him or hate him, is not a sole-forward player. He needs somebody up front with him whom he can knock the ball to.
Last year, during the short stretch when TFC actually did well, the Dichio-Cunningham tandem was the catalyst. When Cunningham got injured, the whole thing got sour and they didn't score for months.
I think TFC should experiment with a direct 4-4-2 formation--or maybe try Cunningham up front as the lone striker, with Dichio coming in as a second forward late in the game if necessary.- Posted 02/05/08 at 10:03 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Arsenal Ian from Toronto, Canada writes: Huh? I must have been watching a different game last night. Danny had a very solid game against NY. It is clear that his role was to play with his back to goal, to recieve the ball and feed it off for midfielders and others who are making the forward run. I would bet that he did this successfully 90% of the time.
Each player has a role on a team. We don't ask Sutton to play midfield, we don't ask Robert to play in goal and we don't ask Cunningham to play that holding position upfront. Dichio plays a particular role, which he does quite well. Just don't ask him to run at defenders, he can't help us there.
The issue last night wasn't Dichio, the issue is the lack of width in attack, which allowed NY to "gum up" the central defense and limit Danny's ability to pass the ball once he got it. Robert and Ricketts were invisible for the wide passes. To be fair tho, the weather was awful so the conditions meant that cross field balls to the wing were a real pain to control.
It's clearly become fashionable to slag Danny. He has a certain role on this team and I think that with Guevara, Robert, Ricketts and Edu attacking from midfield, Dichio has a real role at the club.- Posted 02/05/08 at 12:55 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Random Person from Heard and Mc Donald Islands writes: Dichio is an embarrassment to TFC and all professional soccer...
- Posted 02/05/08 at 5:19 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
NotASpoiledAthelete - from Canada writes: Random Person - you're classic. Who are you to judge so harshly? I don't see your name on the back of a jersey that anyone wants to own.
Dichio isn't meant to be a classic striker...and he never will be. Dichio definitely needs another striker to line up in a slightly offset manner.
Recall the Real Salt Lake game last year where Mo staggered Dichio and Cunnigham to great effect. That is what's needed. But that may not be Carver's game plan..so with that in mind, if Dichio is drawing a double-team as the lone striker, it is up to the attacking midfielder(s) to make the backs pay for that double coverage. If the midfielders don't take advantage of that gaps created - that is hardly Dichio's fault.
And if the attacks from the midfield force the backs to be 'more honest' in their coverage, then the field is opened up for Dichio..it's push-pull but everyone has to work for it - not just the striker.- Posted 02/05/08 at 8:41 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Chris McLaughlin from The Hammer, Canada writes: No, NotASpoiledAthelete got it kinda wrong. It's not that Random Person doesn't have his name on the back of a jersey (although, I suppose he could be Jeff Cunningham in disguise!). It's that the previous and dissenting opinion of Arsenal Ian was informed and substantive. Slagging without a clue is not cool, Random Person, it's what's actually embarrassing. And so is not signing your name. Howay Ben! (And welcome back.)
- Posted 02/05/08 at 8:59 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Dave Hunt from Canada writes: It seems to me..no matter what Dichio's role is...the team is doing extremely well as is...why change anything for now?
- Posted 02/05/08 at 9:17 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
M Kennedy from Offside, Canada writes: We TFC fans were crying out for greater depth to the team...now we cannot mourn when greater depth means changes in roles for those first year heroes, such as Danny Dichio...
Sure, it is time for a game or two of reversed roles, Cunningham to start and Dichio as the late substitute. Or let them have a game back together
.Jarrod Smith has shown a lot of energy as a right wing substitute lately, could he play some striker minutes ?? Whatever the lineup, can't wait for our second chance at Columbus.- Posted 02/05/08 at 9:20 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Random Person from Heard and Mc Donald Islands writes: No,that's true...In my youth days I was a tough right or left defender,called a "pillar of defense"...Not a "striker" for sure...
However,I know enough about soccer who can contribute and who is useless.
Dichio is next to useless and it is a big minus for TFC to keep playing him...
Yes TFC is fine even with this dead wood on the pitch,just imagine what it would be like and how great it would be if he wasn't there at all...
TFC is playing with one man short having Dichio on the pitch....
If he is a maskot,why doesn't he move to the front office and sells merchandise,instead?- Posted 02/05/08 at 9:32 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
NotASpoiledAthelete - from Canada writes: Random Person - I can see why you would think what you think about Dichio in a lone striker role - but as I said, if he is drawing a double-team (which he was) - then where were the midfielders? Shouldn't you be aiming just as much criticism to players not recognizing an advantage of numbers?
- Posted 02/05/08 at 10:16 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Charlie R from Richmond Hill, Canada writes: LMAO... "pillar of defense" in your youth days we're ya? Perhaps you simply hit your head on the goalpost too many times.
It takes 11 men on the pitch to win a match. Not one or two. You clearly do not understand this concept. Dichio has spent the majority of the last 3 matches double teamed. What use it that? It frees up space for Guevara to run. It frees up space for Rickets to run. It frees up Edu, Robinson, Robert and to some extent Wynne to mount attacks.
Yes he's slow, yes he's old, but if he's so useless then why do the opposing backs focus on him? Come on, you self proclaimed tough right or left defender. You surely encountered players of this nature. Unless of course by youth you mean U10.
Guys like Edu and Robinson can be more assertive and advance further to give Dichio more options on the backpass. Edu could have scored had he been a half step quicker. Other teams have caught on to Carver's 4-4-1-1 formation. Perhaps a 4-4-2 or a 4-3-2-1 formation will work better against Columbus. We have enough depth in midfield for a tighter passing game. Coach Carver said the back 4 was our strength, so I think it's time to open up the midfield and forwards more.
I also think with Velez improving, you'll see Wynne gain more confidence on the attack down the flank, a la Roberto Carlos of old.- Posted 02/05/08 at 10:51 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Random Person from Heard and Mc Donald Islands writes: Guys you can put a pylon there to do the same...
The guy{Dichio} doesn't play soccer,just takes up space....- Posted 03/05/08 at 1:09 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Kyle La from Toronto, Canada writes: Random, question for you... are you on this website over 23 hours per day? I swear, your randomness pops up all over the footie forums. Please use dictionary.com before hitting the 'submit' button. Cheers mate!
- Posted 04/05/08 at 11:37 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Random Person from Heard and Mc Donald Islands writes: Kyle La...
Don't tell me what to do.....- Posted 04/05/08 at 11:59 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Stalock Rujulus from Toronto, Canada writes: TFC might consider a 4-4-2 diamond option, with CF: Dichio & Cunny, AM: Guevara, LM: Robert, with Edu, Robinson & Ricketts competing for the DM & RM spots.
- Posted 05/05/08 at 9:26 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment
This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?
You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!
Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
