Former privacy commissioner says he was never given fair chance to rebut accusations ...Read the full article
This conversation is closed
- Skip to the latest comment
-
Spring of Discontent from Ottawa, Canada writes: Radwanski - "I felt entitled.."
Yep, another one falls under the old LIBERAL rule of "I'm entitled to my entitlements.."
Crook. Wear a suit and it's "white collar crime", yet wear a balaklava and you do time. Ironic?- Posted 05/05/08 at 4:20 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Alonso Garnet from Canada writes: He'll get his day in court and a fair trial, and then hopefully a prison sentence. I wonder what his defence will be?
- Posted 05/05/08 at 4:49 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Tom Morrison from Calgary, Canada writes: I remember a university professor commenting about his taxes being forgiven, and how most people would have lost everything if they were in the position he was in at the time.
Must be nice to have friends in high places from time to time.- Posted 05/05/08 at 6:47 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Terry Horton from Canada writes: This guy lost any credibility he may have had a long time ago.
- Posted 05/05/08 at 7:27 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Tiu Leek from T.O, Canada writes: "Yep, another one falls under the old LIBERAL rule of "I'm entitled to my entitlements.."
What about the NEW Conservative rule of "it's not really a crime, since we didn't know what the law meant"?- Posted 05/05/08 at 7:39 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Daniel Cunningham from Victoria, writes: (cough) (cough) bllsht
- Posted 05/05/08 at 10:15 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Scare Crow from Canada writes: Chutzpah! asking that all the evidence discovered should be set aside since the AG and RCMP has not given him warning so he can deep six all incriminating papers against him. The nerve!
- Posted 05/05/08 at 10:26 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Bert Russell Paradox, BC from Canada writes:
Liberal toadies fallen on hard times ... no expense account ... no air miles!!- Posted 06/05/08 at 7:15 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Liberals Steal from Canada writes: That says it all.
The leopard cannot change it's spots.
THIS is what all these liberal apologists here defend and promote daily.
And god forbid if they ever got back into power it will be this all over again, all the time.- Posted 06/05/08 at 7:55 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
D K from Canada writes: "Former privacy commissioner says he was never given fair chance to rebut accusations "
He'll have lots of time now. I notice he never denied he was in the wrong, he is just trying to wiggle away on technicalities.- Posted 06/05/08 at 8:18 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
J K GALBRAITH from Canada writes: Apparently on this forum you are guilty until proven innocent.
- Posted 06/05/08 at 8:42 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Liberals Steal from normal hardworking, Canada writes: J K GALBRAITH from Canada writes: Apparently on this forum you are guilty until proven innocent.
Close.
If you are a liberal, you are a pre-convicted criminal. Whether you are eventually convicted or not depends on your liberal lawyer and judge friends. It's just the nature of the beast.- Posted 06/05/08 at 9:30 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
jimmie rabbit from toronto, Canada writes: Tiu Leek from T.O, Canada writes: "Yep, another one falls under the old LIBERAL rule of "I'm entitled to my entitlements.."
What about the NEW Conservative rule of "it's not really a crime, since we didn't know what the law meant"?
--more like "we don't care what the law says because we ARE the law".- Posted 06/05/08 at 12:46 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Don Bryant from Calgary, Canada writes: Who cares if this piece of sh*t was "ambushed" by the Auditor-General?How about all us honest, hard-working taxpayers who get ambushed by lying, cheating, thieving bureaucrats.
- Posted 06/05/08 at 4:33 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
No Name Necessary from Canada writes: cry me a river....
- Posted 06/05/08 at 5:20 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Charles Brown from Vancouver, BC, Canada writes: Another Liberal appointee who got too used to the good life of federal entitlements.
- Posted 06/05/08 at 6:01 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Fake Name from Canada writes: "Procedural fairness" sounds like wriggling off on a technicality. Hopefully unsuccessfully, if thats the best defense he can come up with.
- Posted 06/05/08 at 10:49 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
bill johnson from Quebec, Canada writes: Don hit the nail on the head. The AG's office, if anything, is far too conservative in pursuing nefarious behaviour. They only go with solid evidence, so I can imagine what breaks that they gave this guy because the evidence was not unassailable. He is getting his comeuppance.
- Posted 07/05/08 at 12:01 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Comments are closed
Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.
Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.


