Silicon.com, a British website dealing with technology in business, published the results of an informal poll the other day in which it asked respondents how many passwords they use at the office.
The result, Workers hit by password overload, is no big surprise. We've all known for some time that we have too many passwords.
Silicon.com reported that a scant 2 per cent of their respondents were lucky enough to have only one; 61 per cent have more than five different passwords. But a fifth of respondents have as many as 20 passwords to juggle.
Interestingly, Silicon.com's survey asked only about office applications. It did not ask for passwords to recreational websites, banking websites, music sites, news sites, and others that respondents might use through their home computers. By the time they're finished, people might have as many as 50 passwords.
This, of course, is insane. People can use password-keeping applications like Roboform, from Siber Systems, a great program that stores all your passwords under one master password. But crack that one password and, if you have access to that computer, you can have all the other passwords at your fingertips. So of course you should change your Roboform password frequently to secure yourself.
It's bad enough to have so many passwords, but office applications are also often outfitted with password sunset features, which kick you off the system after a set period of time and force you to come up with a new password. Not only do they demand complexity (the new password must have at least one upper-case letter, at least two numbers and be at least six or eight characters long), these sunset features can include algorithms that examine your new password and reject it if it's too similar to any of the passwords you used in the past.
In the real world, there is little difference between having 20 passwords or one that you have to change 20 times. There are only so many passwords one can keep in one's head while changing a number of them every two or three months, so many people resort to writing them down. And that makes their computers even more vulnerable.
I asked an IT guy once about why his department keeps demanding workers change their passwords, and he gave me a blank look, as if to say that if I can't keep up with all the password changes the company demands, then that's my problem.
I pressed him further, and he said that the system is in place to protect the IT department from corporate wrath should management decide to look for a scapegoat after a case involving a stolen password.
This is backward. We're making passwords difficult not to secure the computer, but to protect the IT guys who are running the computer system.
Surely there's a better way. Perhaps a portable flash drive with passwords on it, or a portable finger-print reader with all the appropriate passwords recorded in it, although I can see problems with those systems too. I'm also sure a lot of people have their own idiosyncratic ways of keeping track.
Many office workers would love to install Roboform or something similar, but they can't — their computers are, more often than not, locked down because the company doesn't want employees installing any old software that could com promise the office network.
And we do that to make sure we don't leave the nice guys in the IT department vulnerable.

