Surprise assault closest Darfur rebels have ever come to Sudan's seat of government ...Read the full article
This conversation is closed
- Skip to the latest comment
-
Bohemian Grove Club Member from Canada writes: Thank You Chad!!!!!!! About time someone did something about it!
- Posted 11/05/08 at 11:07 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Ed Long from white Rock, Canada writes: Ethnic African rebels attacking the government that sponsors Muslim rebels and the African Union peace-keeping force is where ....?
Doesn't matter, peace-keeping doesn't fit in this world.- Posted 11/05/08 at 1:43 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Albin Forone from Canada writes: The existence of the rebel groups, who are on par with the janjaweed in objectives and tactics, is the sad, unspoken fact ignored by those decrying the Muslim "genocide" in Darfur. There have been three or four nasty sides to this mess all along, and it was idle posturing by the Bush administration to declare a "genocide" and then go into fetal position instead of forming another "coalition of the willing" to do Gawd's work. Not every humanitarian disaster is a "genocide" and the term has been terribly trivialized in recent years by standard bearers and faddists of all political stripes.
- Posted 11/05/08 at 2:59 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
kevin o'connor from Toronto, Canada writes: First, Don't believe a word this gov't says. Second, to Albin, sorry I have been to Darfur and spent 7 months working in refugee camps and outlying rural areas and this is a genocide. The rebels have splintered and are many of the groups are nothing better than bandits, but this is not the same, either in objectives or tactics, to the genocidal janjaweed and their ally, the gov't of sudan. The murdering, raping and elimination of african tribes in the area is based on race, so the genocidaires can have their land. this fits any definition of genocide. You would not think the term has been terribly trivialized if you had to spend a few days with the women who watched their men and children tortured and killed as they themselves were being tortured and raped. I certainly didn't.
- Posted 11/05/08 at 3:29 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Ed Long from white Rock, Canada writes: Albin F. Your characterization of the U.S. is dead wrong.
The U.S. and EU are funding the African Union peace-keeping force in Sudan.
However it is typically Canadian to ignore the implications and scope of genocide because the resultant analysis requires that a nation that considers itself the "nice" country should take action. In the case of Sudan, we have neither the personnel or the equipment to intervene unilaterally in Africa's largest nation.
However, the difficulty is that people like Kevin have been a witness to things beyond our imagination and accepting their experience means coming to terms with our impotence.
Remember Rwanda, and it would never happen again.- Posted 11/05/08 at 4:32 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Karunaratne Jeyatilleke from Ottawa, Canada writes: pssst... Darfur is nothing compared to what is going on in Sri Lanka past two years... hundreds of people are dying each day!!!
- Posted 11/05/08 at 4:54 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Roop Misir from Toronto, Canada writes:
Real changes are those from within!- Posted 11/05/08 at 5:06 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Sam Patel from Canada writes: Karunaratne Jeyatilleke from Ottawa
Sometimes people just have to fight it out. If you have never lost anything before you have no conception of risk or the need to compromise. Let them learn their lessons the same way the West learnt its own.
The real benefit of this rebel attack on the capital is that the Sudanese gov't now knows that its calculations and assumptions are not all perfect. How embarassing for them, and their supposedly in charge leaders.- Posted 11/05/08 at 6:33 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Winston Smith from Canada writes: Karunaratne Jeyatilleke from Ottawa, Canada writes: pssst... Darfur is nothing compared to what is going on in Sri Lanka past two years.
Sri Lanka is not on the radar screen because it has NO PETROLEUM resource.
Sudan is important because it produces oil and the chinese cut a deal with the controlling group but the Condoleezza Rice's Chevron wants back in. That is the reason why Sudan "human rights" is raised as a big issue with Joe Public and not in Saudi Arabia, or Sri Lanka.- Posted 11/05/08 at 7:14 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Albin Forone from Canada writes: Ed L., the German and Rwandan holocausts taught us that when you see a "genocide" you are there yesterday, you are already kicking the living sh1t out of the perpetrators, you are not pussyfooting around with pious hand-wringing blah as if you are not the world's only military power. Why didn't that happen? Because there is no "genocide" - there is a humanitarian emergency created by a lot of little first person shooters who are themselves too young and too poor to read, write or think well enough to be properly genocidal, and are blindly following a bunch of despicable local war lords who are cartoons of any coherent political idea. That is the mess, that is why the US is paying off the AU at $8 per hour to cover it, instead of treating it like a "genocide" with a real intervention.
- Posted 11/05/08 at 7:19 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Springfire From ShenZheng from China writes: So why West is blaming China for all this mess? Pathetic.
- Posted 11/05/08 at 9:50 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Joe Kool from Canada writes: Psst... I don't know where you got your facts, but the conflict in Sri Lanka, while regrettable, does not come close to comparing to the levels of violence and devastation occurring in Darfur.
http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/dbc.nsf/doc108?OpenForm&rc=3&emid=ACOS-635PHK
Why are we whispering? It doesn't matter how quiet you say it... it's still wrong- Posted 11/05/08 at 11:49 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Comments are closed
Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.
Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.


