After being hit with an eBay legal missile last month, Craigslist has responded with a projectile of its own: the company has filed a countersuit accusing the online auction company -- which owns a 25-per-cent stake in Craigslist -- with "unlawful and unfair competition, misappropriation of proprietary information, deceptive passing-off, business interference, false advertising, phishing attacks, free-riding, trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and breaches of fiduciary duty." According to the blog post by CEO Jim Buckmaster, the claim states:
"We respectfully ask the Superior Court in San Francisco to enjoin this conduct and order eBay to (1) make full restitution to craigslist, (2) disgorge their related profits (3) restore to craigslist all shares of the company acquired by means of, or for the purpose of unfair competition, and (4) pay punitive damages for their malicious behavior."
eBay sued Craigslist last month alleging a variety of behaviour on the part of co-founders -- and controlling shareholders -- Craig Newmark and Jim Buckmaster, including the issuance of shares that diluted eBay's stake below the 25-per-cent mark, as well as the creation of an even more dilutive "shareholder rights" agreement, otherwise known as a "poison pill" that had the effect of making it impossible for eBay to sell its stake to anyone other than Craig and/or Jim. Craigslist later made the statement public.
They've now done the same thing with their countersuit by posting the entire thing online. Among other things, the suit alleges that eBay tried twice to put executives from its Kijiji unit -- which now competes head-to-head with Craigslist in the U.S. -- on the board of the classified site. The lawsuit also says that eBay "has used Craigslist's mark and name in commerce to confuse the public and illegally divert Internet traffic from Craigslist to eBay and its Kijiji site," which appears to involve the buying of Google ads that linked to the eBay site but used Craigslist's name.
The bulk of the suit seems concerned with what Craigslist says is eBay's desire to gain access to "proprietary competitive information" to help Kijiji. Rob Hyndman, a lawyer and blogger who specializes in technology startups, says that the lawsuit seems to be an attempt by Craigslist to "accomplish by litigation what it failed to accomplish by business planning and sensible precautions."
