Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Get On the Bus

A foreign reporter takes footage behind Tibetan monks at the Sera monastery in Lhasa, Tibet on Sunday (TEH ENG KOON/AFP/Getty Images)

LHASA - It was the loud man with the megaphone, herding us relentlessly onto the buses, who symbolized the worst of our escorted tour of Tibet.

The official press tour is one of the rituals of Communist China, as time-honored as the ceremony to raise the Chinese flag at Tiananmen Square every morning. It's far from the ideal way to gather news.

But with Tibet still tightly sealed off from the outside world, I accepted an invitation to join a government-sponsored press tour to Lhasa this weekend, realizing it was the only way to get even a limited glimpse into this locked-down region.

It was only the second time that foreign journalists have been permitted to enter Tibet since the wave of sometimes-bloody protests that began on March 10, so I was keen to get a first-hand look into the forbidden territory.

But an official press tour can be a humiliating experience. Our itinerary was filled with weirdly irrelevant events, including a handicrafts exhibition, a visit to a tourist village, and a press conference to announce a performance of traditional dance. The man with the megaphone was constantly barking at us, hectoring us to move faster. The schedule was packed with activity from 7:30 a.m. to 10:30 p.m., to keep us busy and distracted from the real news.

Every moment was pre-programmed. To ensure that we didn't miss anything, we were given unsolicited wake-up calls at 6:15 a.m., urging us out of bed and into the program.

We were lodged in a government hotel, far from the historic centre of Lhasa, to make it even harder for us to have any independent contact with monks or other malcontents.

At the allocated time for dinner on Friday, I managed to slip away from the hotel and hail a taxi to the old town, where I was able to see the massive security presence, including thousands of paramilitary police in camouflage uniforms, in advance of the Olympic torch relay the next day. There were paramilitary troops and regular police on every corner.

A few other journalists also slipped away from the hotel. The next day, we were reprimanded by a government minder, who claimed to be worried about our personal safety. “This is Lhasa,” she warned ominously. “You could get lost, you could be detained. It could happen anywhere, particularly Lhasa. When you're out, we're really concerned. Anything could happen.”

When I protested that Lhasa seemed perfectly safe – especially with police stationed on every street corner – the minder made a vague reference to “intelligence” reports about possible attacks.

(The official minders were a constant source of disinformation. When asked why all the shops near the Olympic torch route were shuttered on Saturday, one minder claimed that Lhasa's shops are always closed on Saturdays.)

The truth is, of course, that the Chinese authorities don't want the foreign media to talk to Tibetans who are unhappy with Chinese rule. The monks, who led the March protests, were kept far out of sight during the press tour. One journalist found a monk in a back corner of the Sera monastery. He said nothing, but burst quietly into tears.

I talked to a few Tibetan shopkeepers near the Jokhang temple, the holiest Tibetan temple at the heart of Lhasa's old town. They were too wary to say much – but they made it clear they were suffering greatly from China's decision to prohibit foreign tourists from entering Tibet.

After I filed my first story on Friday, I took a quick look at the Globe's website. China's censors had blocked my story. The first few paragraphs were visible on my screen, but then it ended in mid-sentence and the website crashed. It was a strange irony: I was invited, but censored.

It's interesting to recall that China promised full press freedom as one of its pledges to the International Olympic Committee when it was awarded the 2008 Olympics. With more and more of China effectively barred to journalists – including Tibet, the ethnically Tibetan regions of western China, and now even some parts of the Sichuan earthquake zone – the pledge of press freedom seems to be fading every day.

A footnote on the press tour: the Chinese state media have claimed that 29 foreign media organizations were invited to Lhasa for the torch relay. What they didn't mention was the peculiar composition of the press contingent.

Not a single newspaper from the United States or Britain was invited. The group was heavily weighted towards TV crews. Geography was apparently the main criteria, with one media organization invited from each major country. The U.S. was represented only by an NBC crew, while the New York Times and Washington Post were excluded. Britain was represented by a BBC crew, while nobody was allowed from the Times, the Telegraph or the Guardian. Almost half of the invited journalists were from Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau.

 

  1. tim smith from Canada writes: Nothing new from the Chinese government, but it is interesting to think of the Beijing Olympics as symbolic of the economic and political support the international community affords a government that essentially functions as an unelected dictatorship but provides nice, cheap exports.

    On a second note, it has been surprising to watch the Chinese government fall flat on its face in its attempts to spread disinformation to the Western media. I almost fell out of my chair when the Ambassador to Canada referred to the Dalai Lama as one of the world's most dangerous terrorists. They have a serious public relations crisis on their hands and so far they have only managed to make worse.
  2. Comments Deleted from Tirana, Albania writes:

    Like, is this supposed to be news?

    Who would expect anything different from a Chinese 'press tour' shurley, the epitome of the Orwellian oxymoronic?

    Would somebody please wake me up when the next story begins????.....
  3. Eriq49 Indignis from Toronto, Canada writes: They are not flat-out psychotic as Burma's regime is. But they have an absolute sense of entitlement/power that will lead them into more egregious blunders before the Olympics are over. That sense will also ensure that they will not care about the consequences of those blunders. That should come as no surprise. The surprise will come to those visitors/athletes/whatever who expect to whip out a small Tibetan flag anywhere near an Olympic venue and get away with it, and anyone who eggs visitors or athletes on to such 'protests' is committing an act of criminal folly.
  4. L Chang from Ontario, Canada writes: Mr. York, our China-nothing-good reporter, the fact that you can stay in China and endlessly bash China in every instance and still got invited to the tour is a testimonial that China human right is making significant progress. The fact that posters from China were able to access G&M and criticize China is another good sign. Rome is not built in a day. This is what I have learned from a renounced journalist: Media job is not to serve one side or the other, but to be the watchdog for all sides. Serious journalism is not to create news to please your audience or your boss. Serious journalism is to take time to ensure absolute truth before it goes to print. Mr. York, on the subject of Tibet, you criticize China for lack of religion freedom yet you ignore the God King who persecuted and outlawed other Tibetan Buddhist sects to ensure his own absolute religion power, and those who defied his writ were thrown out of their jobs, mocked in the streets and even had their homes smashed up by heavy-handed officials from his government-in-exile. You bashed corruption of Chinese government yet you maintain silence on the nepotism of DL and his Tibetan government-in-exile. In your article, you claimed you talked to Tibetan Chinese storeowners and you ignore Han and Hui Chinese storeowners in Lhasa. When your frequent source of information against China on Tibet issue is from the Tibetan exiles group or groups funded by western governments or enterprises with own agenda and objectives, you failed to inform your readers especially when these organizations are hidden under fancy names such as Students for a free Tibet, Free Tibet Campaign in London, International Campaign for Tibet, International Commission of Jurists, Radio Free Asia, Tibet Times Newspaper, and the famous Reporters without borders, etc.,etc. Mr. York, keep learning and you may get there one day to be a truthful and respectful journalist.
  5. Fair Justville from Canada writes: Geoffrey, I just knew you are the Beijing bureau chief. I read some of your stories on China before. I have to say most of them are very negative and one sided. I think you had a good observation in your Tibet tour that you were not recommended to travel around in Lhasa. Probably this is objective. but do you really understand the reason behind it? There are many reasons i guess. one of the reasons i know is western journalists mostly only report on views against China or discover some stories that will support their own preoccupied views. most of them ignore the majority of people who are in for the government in general. BBC once accused China of blocking the disrupted torch relay in London. to support this accusation, a journalist interviewed a Chinese couple on a street in Beijing and they happened to say they don't know what is going on. Ironically the CCTV did report it without any delay at all. They just didn’t watch it. People tend to believe what they already believed. if you just try to reinforce what many Canadians already believed about China, you don't have to go to China. it is a waste of time and money.... if you want to add some values to your articles about China and to G&M, you should study more of China's history, understand more of her culture, and bring both sides of a story and let readers make their own judgment. Most of Chinese don't have any negative bias against Canadians. the key reason is the media never tried to do so. however in the stark contrast, most of Canadian medias educate Canadians on China in such a negative way. people who are better informed are just plainly shocked and disheartened. Can we bring back objectivity to journalism? China wants to build friendship with Canada. Chinese are very friendly to Canadians. Tell people in Beijing you are a Canadian. Probably you will have a very good reception. Unfortunately Mr. Harper has been telling them we are different than you think who we are.
  6. Pamphleteer . from Canada writes: Mr. York, how do you keep from pulling your hair out after reading the idiotic user comments on your articles made by CCP boosters on the Globe forums?
  7. Richard N from Ottawa, Canada writes: most of the western stories in aparthied era south africa were one-sided too. gee, I wonder why?
  8. John John from Canada writes: You are just a whiny baby. Nothing can make you happy. Though not all the time but most of the time you are telling a story based on your twisted mind. It may be beneficial to your personal health if you chose not to stay in this miserable place in your eyes.
  9. The Iconoclast from Canada writes: Just saw the photo of Mr. York - he does look very grouchy. No wonder he is such a whiner.
  10. Pamphleteer . from Canada writes: Richard N: ' most of the western stories in aparthied era south africa were one-sided too. gee, I wonder why?'

    --

    It's because the authors of the stories were either:

    a) jealous of south africa

    b) racist to south africans

    c) ignorant of south african culture

    d) brainwashed by the western media

    e) never travelled to south africa and thus couldn't truly see the light

    note sarcasm
  11. joseph Cheng from Toronto, Canada writes: Too bad Geoffrey York was not booted out of China after goofing around at the middle of the night looking for trouble and negative things to write. Indeed it was too darn unfortunate that he was not detained by Chinese security and locked up somewhere in Lhasa for a while so that he could learn his lesson that he was in another country as a guest and he was not invited there to make trouble. I am also glad that China had the technical ability to block part of his so-called reporting. His aim was to stir trouble among citizens in China. The more trouble there is in China, the more delight a character Geoffrey York will enjoy. I hope the Chinese government will take note of this character and make sure he has a 'great' time if he dares to enter China without his 'Press' foliage to protect him.
  12. Pamphleteer . from Canada writes: joseph Cheng: It's ironic that you keep insisting that only those who travel to China are entitled to say anything about it, yet when journalists who are based in China (some of whom have been there for years and years) send back unflattering reports on the totalitarian regime, you are still not satisfied. The twisted truth is that you're content only when journalists report what you want to hear.
  13. Pamphleteer . from Canada writes: Mr. York, please keep up the good work -- I hope you will still be able to. You're shedding light on a tragic cultural genocide that is unfolding behind closed doors. No matter how much the politburo and its boosters wants the world to turn away, as long as people like you are there we won't.
  14. joseph Cheng from Toronto, Canada writes: York's goofing around to report on negative stories in China is analogous to reporters from another country coming to Toronto and go to the street on Rosedale and report on the recent murders of two young men; to the the lower Boul. St. Laurent area in Montreal; to the Hastings Street area in Vancouver etc. and file reports. Also how would we like it in Canada if foreign reporters go to Caledonia and interview the 1st Nations people about their conflict and discontent with the non-1st Nations residents; to Oka to report on the problems the locals have with the Kahnesatake 1st Nations natives, to Cornwall to report on the 'tax-free' cigarettes smuggled over by speed boats from the U.S. etc. and then file reports to their home country so that citizens in their home country would interpret this to be the real situation in Canada. Undoubtedly there were turmoil and trouble in Lhasa in March. A few Chinese young women were burnt to death in a fire set by young Tibetan thugs and there was massive looting and destruction by young Tibetan thugs. Would anyone think Geoffrey York will bring this up in his so-called 'dispatch from China'? I don't think so! By the way, Geoffrey York: when is your next scheduled meeting with the Dalai Lama where you can take a deep deep bow a la Sharon Stone?
  15. Pamphleteer . from Canada writes: joseph Cheng: Uh, buddy, it called a free press and foreign journalists report on Canadian happenings all the time -- and yeah, sometimes the reports are not that flattering. In a free society, one may not like what another has to say, but that is the price of free expression. If you don't believe in permitting contrarian viewpoints to be heard, then you don't really belive in free expression at all. If you don't agree with what is said, then offer an opposing argument. But don't you dare censor or advocate for the censoring of anyone. Are you sure you were born and raised in Canada?
  16. joseph Cheng from Toronto, Canada writes: Pamphleteer: I usually do not divulge my personal data as you would not wish to either. However, I've no qualms to tell you this: I am a proud 3rd generation Canadian: born, raised, educated and worked in Montreal but now a resident of Toronto and still working. My late father, also a proud Canadian, volunteered to serve in the Canadian military during the 2nd WW and was decorated by our government. I love my country as most Canadians do. But I also believe in fairness particularly in the journalism business because I feel journalists must bear the responsibility of reporting fairly as what they report can have a big effect on all citizens' well-beings and their lives.
  17. Richard N from Ottawa, Canada writes: Most Han who defends china's conduct and attacks 'western media bias' aregenerally speaking out of pure ignorance (they claim to know more about Tibet than Tibetans!) and blinded by racism/nationalism. They are unable to come to grips with the humiliating reality that China's actions relegate that country to a second rate nation.
  18. Pamphleteer . from Canada writes: joseph Cheng: The problem is that you seem to think the results of 'fair journalism' must jive with your world view.

    You do have a point to some extent -- there are certainly political biases that exist in the media. It's undeniable, for example, that Fox News is in bed with the Republican or that The Toronto Star consistently takes left of centre viewpoints in its editorial pages.

    However, between the CCP and their hired journalists, or foreign journalists - from both the right and left of the political spectrum - , who have been consistenly telling the world for decades how badly Beijing adheres to international human rights standards, who do think is objectively more believable? I mean this is an absolute non-starter to any sane person. China is a one party authoritarian state that denies its citizens the right to free expression and pays only lip service to the notion of a free press. You expect the world to believe the Chinese censors over foreign journalists from Canada, the USA, the UK, the EU, Japan, Australian, New Zealand, etc., who all enjoy complete and uncensored editorial freedom?
  19. joseph Cheng from Toronto, Canada writes: Pamphleteer: Every individual has a certain degree of biasness. This is what makes this forum interesting. I must admit a couple of decades ago, I was full of consternation when I first went to China. As my work required me to go there quite often and to live there periodically, my view on China became broadened gradually. In addition, I also had the opportunity to travel across China on a few occasions, including Tibet and Inner Mongolia. Whether one agrees with the CCP or not, there is no doubt, in my opinion, they are doing a pretty darn good job. I hardly saw panhandlers and everywhere people had enough to eat with roofs over their heads. Lhasa is not a decrepit place as some people imagine. I did not see homeless Tibetans on the streets. There are shops and even discos where young Tibetans go to enjoy themselves in the evenings. You may think I am spreading propaganda for China but I'm definitely not. Ask any American, German, French or British who had to work and live there and they would give you more or less the same kind of remark. Of course, China is far from perfect nor is it a one-vote-one-person country. The Chinese government has never pretended to be otherwise. But considering the progress they have made and what they are doing for their people, they are accomplishing something that no other governing bodies in China have ever been able to accomplish since God knows when. When a journalist like Geoffrey York whose responsibility is to inform us about the real situation there, he should be fair and objective. His reporting so far, is completely biased and prone to sensationalism which is obvious to everyone to see. May I also say that to have a meaningful debate, there is no need to use denigrating and derogatory words such as calling others 'weirdo' or 'stupid'. I don't mean you but there are a couple of anti-China individuals on this forum whose choice of words and epithets certainly leaves a great deal to be desired.
  20. Andy Rassull from Toronto, Canada writes: There are many comments about the article and the interesting points are that they almost have the same tone. It is a cinch to infer who there are. Would you please pose your attitudes to the questions following? “These organizations are hidden under fancy names such as Students ........Radio Free Asia, Tibet Times Newspaper, and the famous Reporters without borders, etc.,etc.”, besides, and, probably it is inadvertently overlooked that the spiritual leader has the great reverence to be able to talk with the big guns, high level commissaries, top national leaders in majority of the world. Then, Why do they do that? Why? They are jealous of the prosperous reform of Chinese? or are all of them becoming mutton-head ? “You bashed corruption of Chinese government yet you maintain silence on the nepotism of DL and his Tibetan government-in-exile. In your article, you claimed you talked to Tibetan Chinese storeowners and you ignore Han and Hui Chinese storeowners in Lhasa.” If you live in this country, where and when have you heart about flattering papers? “Nepotism” couldn’t match the way of Chinese any more if you are frank. What is writer’s concern of maintaining silence on the nepotism of Dalai Lama? For what? “if you want to add some values to your articles about China and to G&M, you should study more of China's his..............Chinese are very friendly to Canadians. Tell people in Beijing you are a Canadian. Probably you will have a very good reception. Unfortunately Mr. Harper has been telling them we are different than you think who we are.” If you respect history, What about Mongul? What about Uighur? Only would you had have the room to live in the middle china, “huazhong”, maybe less, if it had been. You know the authentic history of your great wall? (continued)
  21. Andy Rassull from Toronto, Canada writes: It is better that you should study the history. The people in Beijing and other big cities are very friendly to Canadians or foreigners and probably have good reception. It is one hundred percent right, why? Why don’t they have the same attitude towards each other or towards the other poor ethnics or even to their own relatives? This is just the root of the problems! Do you think the Chinese media don&8217;t make most of Chinese have any negative bias against Canada or western counties? Are serious, or following your old way? If you thing so, then, stop joking. If you don&8217;t mind, I am telling you I had never heart of the good social structure, fairness, and about what everything should be comply with law unless, sometimes, getting a handful of technical reports, trade and education relationship, and some festival activity for close to forty years, The men who are not less than twenty have the same feelings.

    (2)continued
  22. Andy Rassull from Toronto, Canada writes: The negative impression of “capitalism, Japan, Kuomintang” couldn’t be purged form my mine, still, although, almost gone. The western way of trading, educating, and making have the people respect the foreigners, don’t you realized that? There are few famous trade mark or production in Chinese words leading you when buying. Hardly be it to find Chinese marks, names or ads in all sumptuous department stories although “made in china” is ubiquitous outside of the country. The ideal jobs the young people want to get is the foreigner’s company, as well, because they can play their roles without the factors of human beings and can get the wage according to his job and timely although it is becoming a little bit slow as the situation is trending to be less up. So the respect have been resulted from the reality and it is a spontaneous way, Maybe you also have the experience, I think. Additionally, and the most important things is that the ethnic people, like Tibet, Uighur etc. , are being eager to live as the Chinese do. They don’t want to be lived in a way of fear, they don’t want to be downplayed, marginalized and assimilated; they want to get to their passports and go abroad without any grant and write their ethnic name using their own language spelling ( (Nijat(first) Wayit (last), not Wayiti Nijiati, then, The first name and family name should be put in the right way, not the Chinese way, at least, for instance. ) (3) continued
  23. Andy Rassull from Toronto, Canada writes: In the foreign countries, and they should be treated as same as the Chinese when replacing passport. ( The Chinese get their passport without any check in one month, the ethnic, like Uighur, could get their passport at least two more months because of suffering to scrutinizing without any reasons only thanks to not being Chinese. although having the same citizenship, Do you know these? If you were in their shoes, What would be your answer?). There are many an actual reasons compel them to harbor the deepest repugnance to the Chinese, It couldn’t be realized in a few days, But you can get something when you know of what too many boys, graduate students, and the men who come from villages are hesitating, lingering, roaming in agony and the every day too many many Chinese, only if they are willing to come, no matter who they are, no matter what he know, are assigned to hospitals ,schools, and administrative offices…… be boss in a short time! Maybe you would say all of these are resulting from the government’s job or some reasons related to that., and you complain the native people have 0 skills or no experiences. If yes, what about you style of life in 60 and 70 years in the last century, without being governed in a right way. The most interesting point is that the people who use parts of wood to cook and live in the place ( saving the style of middle century, Kuqa, Kuche in Chinese, a county, for example) that spurt natural gas have no any condition to use it as the shanghai people do although 5000 km away from the origin of the gas as if it is taken out from Shanghaitan and it is cheaper strangely. Do you know about these? If you were in their shoes, What would be your answer? If you lived Canada, You could send you children to the school supported by government to study Chinese in order to keep your cultures. Yes or not? (4)continued
  24. Andy Rassull from Toronto, Canada writes: It is their right way to live in any humble ways which is hand to mouth when you have the privilege to live luxurious way, Yes or no? They should wait until you become rich, according to Ding’s plan, till drill and destroy all of them with some ambiguous future which make them live in &8220;paradise&8221; and you try to invest to rescue when finished. Yes or no?
    No money, no job, and hanging around, then detained and reply they family he or she will be free after Olympic? What is the mean of the game? It is rather contradictory that the men who are born and live their own place having been put aside and made them feel in the corner. The Chinese is teaching them what is the nationalism with their ideas and behaviour and the natives are learning what is nationalism with their suffering and response, as well. So I thing the writer wrote an article like that not because he stands on the nepotism of others, just because he was not born Beijing, Maybe he is &8220;lack&8221; of some peculiar ideas about cutting off the weak although his ancestors might do like that. It is quite strange to you that some people are willing help others who are completely unfamiliar with.
    (end)
  25. watcher people from NY, United States writes: I think Chinese government is suicidal in Tibet by feeding those Tibetan monks while refusing to let them believe in their living God, Dalai Lama. Also average business men in Lhasa do not like violence which was depicted as uprising in western media. The business man whom I traveled with in China,told me Chinese government was too soft in dealing with violence in the first place. Ironically Dalai Lama does not seek Tibetan independence from China but his sponsors or NGO's are more interested in Tibetan independence. If western powers are so righteous about Tibet, why not send troops there like they did to Iraq?

Comments are closed

Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.

Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to Middle Kingdom

Back to top