Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Slovenian slaughter

Here are a few thoughts about this morning's Slovenian slaughter -- hey that's what they called it on the FIBA website.

1. The drop off from Jermaine Anderson at point guard and whatever combination of Carl English and Andy Rautins they use is simply vast. Anderson is solid and improving but a notch below what you ideally need at this level; Rautins and English simply are not point guards and it's not fair to ask them to play the role.

2. My sense is Sam Dalembert wants to play a bigger offensive role than he normally gets to in Philly. The problem is Canada needs him to focus on blocking shots, running the floor and getting on the offensive glass. That's what makes him good in the NBA and that's what Canada needs also.

3. Sorry to harp on the point guard siuation -- and yes it would be nice to have Nash playing -- but it's ironic that just when Canada's big man rotation is possibly the deepest it's ever been and there is some promise at the wings there is only one even remotely proven point guard available, nationally, unless Rautins badly overlooked someone.

4. After the way the Slovenians shredded Canada with ball movement and dribble penetration, you have to be nervous about what could happen if Korea gets them moving around.

5. From Deeper Andrew followed up with some good observations today:
 
-The Greek network, ERT, showing the FIBA Olympic qualifying tournament has switched their signal to the World Feed and it doesn't appear people with broadband computer access will be able to watch any further games.
 
-Props to The Score & Canada Basketball for providing coverage this morning... some audio problems early on but all things considered it wasn't that big of a deal... problem resolved around 6:20 am
 
-In case people are wondering Jeff Taylor provided the commentary for the FIBA International feed... I believe he's from North Carolina, very knowledgeable and his work appears on the FIBA website
 
-Canada came out strong... and early on got a lot of good looks... ran a lot of solid offensive sequences... in fact, Canada scouted Slovenia at the Alpos Cup and took away many options in the first three of four minutes of the game, which included several steals
 
-Canada totally out of sync when Jermaine Anderson is out of the game for any prolonged period of time... once he came out of the game with his 2nd foul, the Slovenians immediately began denying Rautins the ball on the in-bounds pass... and when Canada was able to get offensive sets with English and Rautins on the floor, the Slovenians were trapping guards at the top and forcing decision making situations
 
-Canada still trying to establish an offensive identity when the first five are off the floor, second unit hasn't meshed
 
-Most noticeable on the defensive side of the court for Canada is the lack of ball pressure
 
-Slovenian spacing on offense is problematic for Canada, and their ability to put the ball on the floor allowed them to get to the FT line
 
-Slovenia's M2M defense was disruptive, especially out on the perimeter where they took away dribble penetration opportunities, forced Canada late into the 24-second shot clock with great interior, help defense... usually resulted into low % shots
 
Andrew

 

  1. Overtaxed and underlaid from Canada writes: ... am I the only one who doesn't give two figs about national men's basketball? Sorry to rain on the parade.

    So.... what's Jawai been up to?
  2. Gus M from Canada writes: How are you raining on anyone's parade, Overtaxed? Just because you don't care? Go ahead and not care. Doesn't matter to me. You're not the only one. It's not as if we're going to go, "What? Someone doesn't care? You mean I've been wasting my time?" You like what you like and we'll like what we like.
  3. Steve C from Nanaimo, Canada writes: Good analysis. I was hopeful about this tournament, but without better point guard play, Canada has no chance of qualifying. Good point guards are even more crucial in international basketball than in the NBA.

    Slovenia's perimeter defense was very tight and made outside shooting tough. Canada rarely made them pay with dribble penetration.

    I didn't think the audio was a problem. There was no commentary for the first quarter, but the sounds of the game were great. The commentator called Carl English "Alex" for most of the game.
  4. Khan dor from Canada writes: Personnel wise this is not the best use of the players (and the coaches) available to Canada Basketball.

    Wayne Parrish should not be the CEO of this organization.
    The Board of Directors for Canada Basketball should not be in the positions they hold.
    The Managers of the Men's and Women's national teams programs should not be in the positions they hold.
    Canada Basketball, as a National Sport Organization, should be disbanded (obliterated) and an alternative group should be formed to operate the Men's and Women's National Teams Programs starting over from scratch.
  5. Khan dor from Canada writes: Michael,

    If you think this is the deepest, most talented group of Canadian Bigs assembled yet ... then you need to review your Canada Basketball history. This group, despite the presence of Dalembert and Anthony dosn't even come close in this category.
  6. Gus M from Canada writes: I agree, Khan, but why not tell us which team you think had the deepest, most talented group of bigs? And while you're at it, tell us what's wrong with Parrish, the BoD, and the managers. I'm all ears. (Or eyes, in this case.)
  7. Steve C from Nanaimo, Canada writes: Gus, if you agree about there being a better group of bigs, why don't you tell us who you think they were?
  8. Gus M from Canada writes: Good point, Steve. The problem is my memory sucks and I can't remember names. How about the year Wiltjer led the Olympics in rebounding? Who else was on the front line? Or when Canada won the student games in '83 against Barkley and Malone in the semis? Since Khan posted the line originally, I figured he had some specific teams in mind.

    This current team looks good on paper, not as good on the court. I guess I'm always struck that the best basketball players -- especially in international competition -- aren't always the most athletic. They're the ones with the high basketball IQ. And please don't take this as a racial comment; it's not. The international game especially requires deep teams of players who can do everything pretty well, so everyone has a silky smooth jump shot, plays a team game where individuals aren't looking for their own shot and can pass and rebound effectively, too. Just because a player plays NCAA div I doesn't mean they're a good fit internationally.
  9. Khan dor from Canada writes: Gus, just one recent example would be the 2000 Olympic Team that had Todd MacCullah (sp?), Michael Meeks, Martin Keane, Greg Newton, Peter Guarasci ... if I'm not mistaken ... not to mention other teams of yesteryear which contained the likes of Bill Wennington, Lars Hansen and Greg Wiltjer, etc.. RE: Canada Basketball, believe it or not ... I'm not in the business of ripping on real life people who live and work everyday within the basketball community in Canada. Some of what I try to do from time to time is correct (bad/mis-) information others pass along. Others who then become interested in what I have to say about a subject are free to investigate my claims further or to ask me to clarify (as best I'm able to within what I consider to be good taste) my perceptions so that they can better understand my alternative perspective on a specific matter, which to that point, might have been expressed in an one-sided/opposite way.
  10. Khan dor from Canada writes: Gus, what I can tell you about "Parrish, BoDs and managers" is this ... the only person in that group that may understand how the elite level game actually works is possibly Bryan Colangelo (who I think is just an 'Average' GM in the NBA and) who does NOT have the time or the inclination to oversee the day-to-day running of Canada Basketball properly, given his obligations to the Toronto Raptors. Until CB gets competent, full-time people who actually understand how elite level basketball actual works it's a waste of resources to keep this organization afloat.

Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to From Deep

Back to top