- Post a comment
- Skip to the latest comment
- Back to the blog
If banks do manage to sell BCE buyout debt later this month, they're going to have to jump through some interesting hoops.
Four banks, led by Citigroup, are planning to unload a portion of the $35-billion they will lend to the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan and its partners on the largest leveraged buyout ever attempted. Given the somewhat insane condition of credit markets, that syndication effort seems doomed to failure, but as of now, that's the plan.
The $17.9-billion (U.S.) Clear Channel Communications buyout, and debt sale that followed, is held out as an example of what might happen with the BCE buyout package.
Lenders marked down the price of Clear Channel junk bonds to 70 cents on the dollar and managed to unload $228-million of this debt back in September. That was less debt than the banks anticipated selling, but better than nothing.
But here's where hoops need to be cleared. Hedge funds bought the bulk of those Clear Channel bonds. These hedge funds were tight on cash, or needed loans for leverage. So the banks lending to Clear Channel turned around and made new loans to hedge funds, to finance the purchase of Clear Channel debt.
Think about those new loans. In addition to a hefty loss on the sale - the Wall Street Journal put the haircut for lenders at $68-million - the banks strapped on new credit risk, to hedge funds. As you may have noticed, hedge funds are shutting down left and right. No bank is looking for new exposure to high-yield hedge funds, yet that's the price that needs to be paid to sell off BCE exposure.
The dilemma now facing BCE's lenders - Citi, Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland and Toronto-Dominion Bank - is whether to push forward with a massive debt sale in the worst credit market since the ‘30s, with all the new lending risks that may bring. The alternative is to shoulder the entire loan package, and hope to eventually parcel it out in better days.
The stock market, of course, is saying this whole buyout is unlikely to close, as scheduled, by Dec. 11. BCE shares touched a 52-week low of $31.75 (Canadian) Wednesday on the TSX, then bounced back to close at $33.35. Royal Bank of Scotland's woes, and the British banking bailout, are the latest reasons to doubt the deal comes to pass as expected.
BCE trades at a massive discount to the $42.75 offered by Teachers and its backers, Providence Equity Partners, Madison Dearborne and Merrill Lynch.
There are three main tranches of debt that come with the BCE buyout, all of which were rated by DBRS on Tuesday. The credit rating agency handed the $23.05-billion term and revolver loan package at an investment grade of triple-B (low), while the $7.5-billion senior bridge loan is at double-B (low) and the $3.8-billion subordinated bridge loan is rated single-B.
A note Wednesday from TD Waterhouse pointed out price of existing Bell Canada debt actually rose after DBRS commented that outstanding, pre-buyout bonds have “outstanding prospects for full recovery” in a default.
-
Joseph Pileggi from Toronto, Canada writes: We all talk about the subprime problem, but the BCE deal is another side of the corporate greed coin. First of all this is a crazy deal. The four banks providing the funding are lending money on an asset that is worth 1/2 of what it was at the time of the agreement. Secondly, the banks are tying up money that could be used to ease the credit crunch. Ŧhird, the teachers do not want an asset worth 1/2 as much, so why is this deal going through. I guess you have to ask who is the beneficiary of this deal... my guess it is a very few interested executives who want to make sure they get their exorbitant bonues (for a job well done).
- Posted 08/10/08 at 9:43 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Winter Mute from toronto, Canada writes: deflation will help sell these loans/debt/bonds, by march09
carry on- Posted 09/10/08 at 12:09 AM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
ali mansur from Etobicoke, Canada writes: I don't see how they are going to get out of the deal. The banks have been trying to wiggle out of this for a year now.
The last ditch attempt was to get the supreme court to ruin the deal from the company's side via bondholders. If BCE had to back out, there is no $1B penalty.
Don't forget that BCE hasn't been paying dividends for the last two quarters (I think two). That's a lot of coin. The dividends were about $1.2B/yr
So on the basis that BCE is worth $32 about $2.50 for penalties and unpaid dividends, they are worth at least $34.50 right now. I also seriously doubt that bansk would be forced to discount the debt 30%.
I'd buy BCE debt discounted by 30% along with the 8% or whatever the debt pays. Funny though how that type of offer doesn't ever get to me.- Posted 09/10/08 at 9:04 AM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
ali mansur from Etobicoke, Canada writes: Keep in mind, this is not a neutral deal. The buyers stand to make a lot from this, so they will fight tooth-and-nail to get it through.
- Posted 09/10/08 at 9:32 AM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
hugh grant from Canada writes: The ONLY people who want the deal to go ahead are Senior Mgmnt at BCE 'cause the golden parachutes kick in, and investors who currently see the shs now trading at sub $34 (the same ones who thought the takeout of $42.75 was too low). I'll bet the Banks don't want it to go ahead, and there is a Private Equity group and a pension fund that would love for the deal to die.
- Posted 09/10/08 at 10:07 AM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Bob Cajun from the glorious nation of coboconk, Canada writes: At the risk of sounding like a communist, maybe the Federal government should use its $8B surplus to buy $8Billion worth of the debt. Think of the benefits:
(1) Bell is not going to default on payments, so its a good return to Ottawa given the pricing
(2) the taxpayer is somewhat protected should Bell raises rates to screw customers
(3) Pressure is off the capital levels of participating banks that Canada Pension Plan probably has a share in anyways (not that I own shares in Citi or TD or RBS or Deutschbank ;-)
(4) Its not like any new government can deploy the surplus effectively due to the time lag of setting up new programs or benefiting from tax cuts- Posted 09/10/08 at 11:04 AM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Jack S. from Canada writes: And as the CAD implodes relative to the USD, the deal gets cheaper. . Seeing the CAD (functional banking system, government booking a fiscal surplus) currency decline vs. the USD (dysfunctional banking system, huge deficits, and printing more USD to bail out its banking system every day) is counterintuitive, but if we're truly facing global asset deflation, then all the fiat currencies remain stable relative to each other while commodities decline. Net result is that fiat currencies leveraged to commodity prices will drop farther than fiat currencies leveraged to thin air.
- Posted 09/10/08 at 2:01 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment
This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?
You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!
Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

