Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Technology

QuickSort

Where the Globe divides the high from the
low elements of Internet and digital culture

Entry archive:

A screen shot of the Google+ social network is shown in this publicity photo released to Reuters June 28, 2011. (HO/REUTERS)
A screen shot of the Google+ social network is shown in this publicity photo released to Reuters June 28, 2011. (HO/REUTERS)

Stumbling through Google+ with two left feet Add to ...

Using Google+ is a little like learning to waltz after you've been doing the Merengue all your life.

I've been using Twitter since 2007. One of the first things I do in the morning is grab my smartphone and sift through what the people are posting. Sometimes, at night, I nestle up to my laptop and dive deep into my tweet stream, basking in the familiarity of the tidy little platform. I'm comfortable in 140 characters or less. I know all the lingo. I follow Twitter etiquette, from retweeting others (with a proper RT) and I am confident about how much I should post, what I should post and I have a good understanding of the audience that is reading.

More related to this story

With Google+, I have two left feet. Every time I log into my account, all I encounter is unfamiliar. Sure, I know the people in my circles and I love the slick interface, but when it comes to filling in the blank box to share something new, I'm at a loss. There is so much, well, emptiness staring back at me. When I stumble over to the camera icon to post a photo of myself hanging out on vacation, it feels oddly creepy (obnoxious, in a way). At first I was leaning toward sharing other people's posts, but now that seems sort of lame. Yesterday I opted for low hanging fruit, throwing out a simple question to my circle of followers.

“How many posts is too little/too much on Google+?” I asked. With 150 comments and counting, clearly I wasn't the only one asking questions about this new social space. I'd love to summarize and share the gist of the reactions, but my stream of replies is ever so long. I suppose the one authoritative message that stood out was from online rockstar +Robert Scoble (yes, this is how you refer to someone on Google+, just like an @ on Twitter, but not as pretty). Here was his reply: “I would worry instead about the QUALITY of what you're sharing. If it's regularly high quality who cares?” Clearly he must know something; he has amassed nearly 100,000 followers in the few weeks since the social networking tool launched.

There was one reply in my comment stream that has lifted my Google+ spirits. User Nick Rock reminded me about an extension for the web browser Chrome called G+ME that makes it easier to scan posts and follow conversations (the add-on collapses posts and integrates a sidebar so you can see more information without expanding a message). Phew. This has somewhat uncomplicated what's “plus-ing” in front of me (sorry, I couldn't think of a better verb). However, no technology will solve my posting inhibition.

I like Google+, I think. It's new. It's shiny, in a web sort of way. It's highly energetic. I suppose it's like learning a new dance and I'm making that adjustment. And the only way to nail down all of the step is to practise, practise, practise.

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeTechnology

 

Topics:

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories