Skip to main content

Architect Anne Cormier in the offices of Atelier Big City, June 29, 2012.

john kenney/Handout

Design can make the world a better place. That’s the promise of the Margolese National Design for Living Prize, which relaunches this week with a $50,000 prize and a renewed mandate.

The award, from the University of British Columbia’s School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (SALA), reflects a recent shift in the design professions toward political and social questions – one that the school is determined to push along.

SALA emphasizes “the tradition of the designer as activist – a concern with the environment and with social justice,” said Ron Kellett, the dean of SALA. “We’re looking for people who are using their design talents to do meaningful work.”

Story continues below advertisement

After a three-year hiatus, the Margolese relaunches next week at SALA’s Arthur Erickson Lecture. Speaking is the Vietnamese architect Vo Trong Nghia, whose practice has an emphasis on sustainability and social impact.

The prize is open to architects, landscape architects, planners, designers, engineers and those in related fields.

The lecture, and the pedagogy of the school, embody some of the same ideas the prize is meant to suggest. “We have an interdisciplinary view of the world,” Kellett said, “and we look for the connections between things.” And, he adds, “we don’t need a prize to reward beautifully made places. Other awards already do that.”

This is an important point. The major international prizes, particularly in architecture, favour expensive work by professionals of retirement age.

Meanwhile, young designers in the past dozen years have increasingly brought progressive politics to their work, and focused on questions such as social housing – reviving the spirit that animated modern architecture 50 years ago. This creates a tension when they hit the workplace. The professions of architecture and landscape architecture in Canada have less influence than they used to; many architects remain politically disengaged; and the professions are led predominantly by older white men.

The Margolese prize, then, has the potential to shape public conversation in important ways. But Kellett suggests it hasn’t always done so. “We were very concerned that it wasn’t achieving what we thought it could achieve,” Kellett said. “We weren’t getting the awareness of the prize even close to what we had expected; there were some years when we had to struggle to give away $50,000.”

Funded through a bequest from Vancouver developer Leonard Herbert Margolese, the prize has been awarded six times since 2012. Winners include the landscape architect Cornelia Hahn Oberlander in 2015 and the Idle No More leader Sylvia McAdam in 2016.

Story continues below advertisement

Both of those are entirely worthy of acclaim. But Oberlander is a giant in her field and was 94 years old when she won. She doesn’t need any more awards. McAdam, says Kellett, was a “dark horse” for the prize, without an obvious connection to design, but has done “really important work” in commissioning housing for Indigenous communities.

The Notre-Dame-de-Grâce Cultural Centre.

Handout

The most recent winner, Anne Cormier, is a leader of the architecture firm Atelier Big City (ABC) and teaches at the University of Montreal. She’s a fine example of a designer with a social conscience; ABC has long been committed to excellence in public architecture (such as the Notre-Dame-de-Grâce Cultural Centre) and to thoughtful social housing.

But she, too, is a well-known quantity. Who will succeed her? Who will lead the design professions forward to do work that is socially relevant? The winner will be chosen by an independent jury, but Kellett hopes that the award will go to an emerging professional. “It would be nice to recognize someone who is still pushing forward, to help them along their path,” he said.

The prize will be awarded in fall 2021.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies