Skip to main content

David Armstrong Six is among a generation of younger Canadian artists – Jaime Angelopoulos, Scott Lyall and Geoffrey Farmer among them – influenced by the mid-century modern sculptures of Bourgeois, Barbara Hepworth, David Smith and others.

"Art is a guaranty of sanity," said Louise Bourgeois – a woman for whom nothing, least of all the materials with which she worked, was lacking in meaning. This summer, "Louise Bourgeois: 1911–2010," shows at Toronto's Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art, having travelled there from the National Gallery of Canada. It's a powerful selection of works from throughout Bourgeois's career, and a testament to her unique approach to modernist sculpture.

From Bourgeois's artistic beginnings in the 1940s through to her death in 2010, she made form come alive with personal associations. Vital to Bourgeois was the unconscious, as her years of psychoanalysis taught her. Here, people and concepts blur and merge. In dreams and neuroses, mothers, fathers, children and lovers – all flashpoints for Bourgeois – enter the haunting, and still very real, territory of myth and archetype. Among others, contemporary art therapists and their patients owe much to Bourgeois's pioneering work.

At MOCCA, Bourgeois is paired with Berlin/Montreal-based sculptor David Armstrong Six – whose work has uncanny, if superficial, similarities to hers. For an artist as famously troubled as Bourgeois (and for Armstong, who clearly shows Bourgeois's heavy influence in his work), the selections on display at MOCCA have an airy feel and a conspicuously positive mood throughout. Yet, as Bourgeois herself knew, art, especially after brushes with suffering and death, can signal hope – the triumph of expression over annihilation.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter