Skip to main content

A closed sign hangs on the door of an art museum in Vienna on March 11, 2020.

Ronald Zak/The Associated Press

Sarah Bay-Cheng is dean of the School of the Arts, Media, Performance and Design at York University.

Amid the constant updates on the COVID-19 pandemic, Steven Soderbergh’s 2011 Contagion has become one of the most popular films streaming on Netflix. Soderbergh’s film eerily predicts the current situation and offers not only vivid descriptions of how a pandemic might happen, but also the comfort of a resolution. It’s no wonder that people turn to fictional stories to make sense of what is happening around them and to imagine a peaceful conclusion.

Historically, the arts have always played this role. From Indigenous storytelling traditions across the world to contemporary media, humans rely on artistic representations to make sense of life’s constant changes. This is especially true in challenging times.

Story continues below advertisement

Yet even as audiences turn to streaming stories for reassurance and distraction (the 1990s television show Friends is trending alongside Contagion), artists are confronting the consequences of COVID-19. The economic impact on the arts will be felt even after the coronavirus ceases to be a public-health concern.

Across the world, large gatherings are being cancelled, including theatre and dance performances, music events and art exhibitions. While the consequences are significant for large institutions and related tourist industries, the hardest hit will be smaller organizations and independent artists, as ticket sales, international residencies and public funding dry up. Some might not make it.

The popular music and cultural event South by Southwest (SXSW) has already been cancelled. The conference and festivals draw some 400,000 visitors annually to Austin, Tex., where a hotel occupancy tax is a major source of arts funding. SXSW’s contribution to Austin’s economy totalled US$355.9-million last year. The impact of its cancellation is significant. Thirty per cent of SXSW staff have been laid off, and other major festivals are scrambling. Without Austin’s major event, it’s unclear how many smaller arts organizations will survive the loss of public funding.

This is not to say that large events should risk the health of audiences, but theatre history shows that there may be ways to protect both public health and the arts.

During the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918, New York theatres and cinemas stayed open but created a rotating schedule to spread out evening audiences. Even as city health commissioner Royal Copeland worked to combat the spread of the disease, he also prioritized New York’s arts and entertainment. As he later wrote, keeping theatres open prevented citizens from “going mad on the subject of influenza.” He brought in regulations requiring theatres to regularly ventilate during off-hours. He closed smaller spaces and those deemed unsanitary, but worked hard to keep many of the city’s venues open throughout the crisis.

He also used theatres to educate the public and promote ways to prevent the spread of the disease. His vision was a precursor to the viral (sorry!) TikTok dance video demonstrating proper handwashing techniques. (As someone recently remarked, we’re living in the golden age of public-service announcements.) Remarkably, Copeland managed to protect the majority of his city’s arts and cultural institutions while also keeping New York’s fatality rate the lowest on the East Coast.

We have options. Today there are many more ways to engage with the arts, including live streaming of performances and virtual museum exhibits. Chinese museums are using digital exhibits to engage communities under quarantine. Large-scale stage productions such as National Theatre Live and The Met: Live in HD bring live theatre and opera to screens around the world. HowlRound, SpiderWebShow and On the Boards have become exemplars of how media technologies can deliver a range of contemporary performances to audiences digitally. While such developments are exciting, smaller companies and individual artists will need help.

Story continues below advertisement

Communities everywhere should keep in mind the precariousness of our irreplaceable arts and cultural institutions and work to support them. Even the most successful, world-renowned institutions often operate with surprisingly slim profit margins. If we’re not able to attend as many events in person, we will need to continue to support them all, big and small.

Hopefully we can learn from the lessons of the past and work to ensure the sustainability of the arts, all while taking the necessary precautions for public health. As the viewership of Contagion makes clear, the arts become especially valuable during crises. (Just ask those under quarantine.) Our current challenges will surely pass. We will need the arts – and artists – long after the COVID-19 pandemic has become just another story we tell.

The Globe and Mail has five brand-new arts and lifestyle newsletters: Health & Wellness, Parenting & Relationships, Sightseer, Nestruck on Theatre and What to Watch. Sign up today.

Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you manage your health, your finances and your family life as Canada reopens.
Visit the hub

In the interests of public health and safety, our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access. However, The Globe depends on subscription revenue to support our journalism. If you are able, please subscribe to globeandmail.com. If you are already a subscriber, thank you for your support.

Your subscription helps The Globe and Mail provide readers with critical news at a critical time. Thank you for your continued support. We also hope you will share important coronavirus news articles with your friends and family. In the interest of public health and safety, all our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access.

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies